The Argument That Anything Legal Is Ethical

Decent Essays
Why does the argument that “anything that is legal is ethical” is insufficient? The argument that ‘anything that is legal is ethical’ is insufficient and complicated topic to discuss, because it contradict the majority of legal systems around the globe. However, it is important to point out that laws cannot satisfy every member of the population, and in order to have a healthy balance within our communities, the government need to find codes of conduct and procedures that benefit most people and do not harm the future of a nation; in other words, laws are made to find fairness for most people and seek for the right equilibrium, for this simply reason, not always what is legal is ethical. According to Massood Samii & Southern New Hampshire

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Everyone wants to do the right things in one way or another. Would you put yourself out in a situation to do it? By putting yourself out in the world it may cause a difference or start a reaction. Even when you believe it won’t have any change where you’re at, but it is something you must fulfill. You are supposed to risk everything to stand up for what you believe in, because that’s what your morals say is right.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affluenza Teen Case Study

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Apartheid is legal. The Holocaust was legal. Slavery was legal. Colonialism was legal. Legality is a matter of power, not justice.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this particular author (Lon Fuller) believes that morality and law is connected, but just as he has his own opinion on the matter, other authors have different positions on this case. Authors like HLA Hart, he believes that there is no such thing as the necessary link between law and morality. The link between morality and law can be assumed to mean that there is a moral obligation to abide by the law, which for most people is not the case. Most people abide by the law in light of their own self-interest (i.e not wanting to be fined, incarcerated, or any form of…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People still commit crimes so this world is not perfect but it has been agreed that those who do will be punished. This is why letting the legal is the ethical thing to do. However as the reader soon finds out the punishment given by the prosecutor does not match the…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fluidity of law as a whole has allowed Canadian law to develop at the same rate that society changes. Some moral standards in Canada have changed, and that is directly reflected in Canadian law; moreover, gay marriage would not have been legal fifty years ago, but was legalized once society had a different view on the matter. Likewise, the morality of robbery has not changed and neither has the law. Many of the laws and values in Canadian law can be directly reflected from the Ten Commandments. The foundation of Canadian Law is derived from a modern view of the Ten Commandments with a negative consequentialist foundation.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Morris does a great job of explaining the different challenges of ethics we face on a daily basis. We as a society go through life with so many obstacles to overcome, and yet society has shown us that most of the time the obstacles dictate the outcome. We read Tom’s book which gives us so many categories to help us better understand the ethical actions people take during certain situations. The first part of this chapter starts us off with the title, what are the rules now, anyway? As we read this statement alone it relates to society in such a big way.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Often times the terms we don’t know who to fault when it comes to limits of legitimate law making. The terms “harm principle” and “legal paternalism” never come to mind when we are seeking these answers. This is remarkably ironic because both of those terms justify laws. In this essay i will go into depth on each term and provide examples of how they justify law and human morality. John Stewart Mill, inadvertently created the term Harm Principle in his essay On Liberty, where he defends extensive individual liberty.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Laws Morally Right

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I don’t believe citizens should follow unjust laws epically when it goes against what they believe is right. There is a word for that and that word is integrity meaning being honest and having strong moral principles. Even though laws are set to protect people they don’t always do. For example, in 2005 there was a law made to where police officers don’t have to protect people they just have to enforce laws and to me that isn’t morally right. In order for that to change citizens shouldn’t totally ignore what’s going on but they could have a voice and try to change what’s going on.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I read the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee as a requirement in my junior year of high school. It also came to be my favorite book because its themes are still relevant today; even though, it was written over fifty years ago. The novel also forced me to take a new perspective and experience empathy for a variety of characters. In this paper, I will take a rhetorical analysis on the way the author attempts to persuade the reader in teaching the lessons of her writing. To Kill a Mockingbird is an important piece of rhetorical literature because it persuades readers to challenge their moral views.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rule Of Law

    • 1584 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The rule of law is an idealistic concept of characteristics in a legal process, which ought to exist in a good constitutional system. There is controversy over the rule of law because there is no definite meaning of it. For example, there is one view that it should prescribe a form of law and the procedure that should be used to form it. This is supported by Lord Bingham’s sub-rule, “questions of legal right and liability should ordinarily be resolved by application of the law and not be the exercise of discretion.” If rule of law was used this way, it could have practical use because it does not prescribe particular content for legal rules, which gives a constitutional system the flexibility to form laws.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law can be considered both a mechanism of rights expansion and reduction, and the same can be said for how it impacts inequality. Various strides have been made and continue to be made that work to reduce inequality, but it is not entirely possible nor should it be expected that the law be the ultimate responsibility in resolving issues of inequality. The law lacks the capacity to consider all dynamics of a given inequality claim, but often does its best to solve the issue expediently while leaving out technicalities that would ensure its effectiveness. Legal institutions dealing with social issues lead to consistent perpetuation of racial inequality due to their inability to recognize the diversity of minority groups and the legislation…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction In an ideal world, everyone expects to be treated equally. We all expect for factors such as culture diversities not to have an influence on the decisions we make. However, this has not been the case since these diversifications have a great impact on our decisions. In the criminal justice system, for example, ethical conducts have been established to assist in reducing some of the influence diversification has on decisions regarding punishments to criminals (Hames and Ekern, 2013).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The reasoning behind this idea is that law must be authoritative. A key way to identify ‘law’ is that it openly claims this authority – which in turn provides the incentive to act on it. But for law to be successful, it must be able to be followed without any deliberations on the reasoning behind it. Raz thus distinguishes between the reasoning behind a law, which may involve consideration of its moral merits, and the law itself, which, by virtue of its need to have a genuine claim to authority, must not incorporate any moral…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays