Insanity Defense In Criminal Psychology

Superior Essays
The Insanity Defense. What constitutes its use? How can personality psychology server to the client’s advantage? How is this field of psychology used to better determine a criminal’s behavior? How often is this form of defense used, and how successful is it in serving as a “get out of jail free card”? Before one can even begin to fathom any of these questions, one must first understand what this defense signifies. As one of our moral checks on the Criminal Justice System (CJS), the insanity defense is utilized in a criminal case where the defendant is deemed unaccountable for his/her own actions due to either a sporadic or chronic psychotic ‘break’ at the time of the unlawful act. The court has established several precautions – either to …show more content…
Criminologists – the examiners of criminal behavior, its causes, and effects on society – have tried to understand what ‘triggers’ these individuals to act out. Within this field, a way of understanding criminality is through the psychological frame of reference, which is where psychology finds its niche in the CJS. For example, Humanistic psychologists would claim that individuals have the free will to decide how we behave (thus are unpredictable), psychoanalysts would claim that individuals have underlying, unconscious fixations that may influence the likelihood of certain behaviors, and biological psychologists would claim that behavior can be influenced through our physiological, genetic, and developmental components. However, it would be naïve for anyone to interpret the relationship between our psychology and criminal behavior as simply black or white. When determining when an individual is applicable for the use of this defense, advocates against its use tend to argue that individuals will take advantage of this as a form of protection from ending up in jail for their actions, as well as there is no true way of determining if their actions were of their own doing or out of their control. On the other hand, advocates for its use tend to argue that, at times, the offense was a result of circumstances beyond the individual’s …show more content…
As the different perspectives of psychology have shown us, the relationship between one’s psychology and criminal behavior is not a simple dichotomy. To begin effectively examining and comprehending what drives an individual to offend, researchers must look at each situation from a full, educated perspective, while integrating multiple perspectives, before deciding if an individual is at fault or in a state of insanity at the time of a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Third, they explore the personality characteristics of criminals and acknowledge that criminals do tend to be more impulsive, intolerant, and irresponsible than non-criminals. Lastly, they investigate the relation of criminality to such mental disorders as psychosis and…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a defense in the court of law put in place for people who suffer from mental illness and commit crimes. Under this defense, the mentally ill are not entirely held responsible for their actions given the terms that they were not in the correct state of mind when the crime took place. The person would admit to committing the crime, but then say they are not guilty by reason of insanity (Francone). This plea has been used in my cases throughout history.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense History

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state will imprison but also treat the defendant for their mental illness if they were declared “guilty but mentally ill”. There is an approval of the defense because the mentally ill defendant couldn’t understand that the criminal act they were committing was illegal. When the defendants are declared “not guilty by reason of insanity” then they will go free of prosecution and might be treated for their mental illness. People agree with the Insanity Defense because they think that the “insane” were not in the right mind at the time of the criminal action and could not decipher right from wrong or they didn’t know that their actions were criminal. These people think that the Insanity Defense is fair because, when the defendant is declared mentally insane than they may be incarcerated and treated; which will punish for the criminal act and treat them for their illness or they may only be treated which is believed to show that treatment is the goal and the way that is wanted to use to help the mentally ill instead of punishing them.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Papers

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Morse and Richard, “some form of an insanity defense is a matter of fundamental fairness in a just society. It gives doctrinal expression to fundamental moral and legal principles that have been recognized by the common law for centuries and that the supreme court has repeatedly acknowledged (Morse, Richard, 488). Also, the insanity defense has been in the law since the 14th century and almost all state and federal law makers still agree on its importance today (Morse, Richard,…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense Theory

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The defense team of Albert Fish tried to proclaim him insane and save him the capital punishment. In general, however, a successful insanity defense technique for a serial killer is not common, especially when it comes to such a big number of extremely heinous crimes committed against children. Fish was diagnosed with paranoid psychosis, yet found sane and responsible for his actions, thus sent to the electric chair (Hasselt & Hersen, 2013). The psychiatric testimony that was used in the prosecution did not serve Fish well, because of his undetected prior actions (Chermark & Bailey, 2016). Pursuant of the cognitive theory, criminalists focused on the mental processes of the individual, and the way he perceived the world around him, to prosecute…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel knowing a man stabbed his wife twenty-six times and killed her, but walks the streets as a free man just because he was “sleepwalking,” not too safe right? The previous question presents one of the many flaws in the United States' legal system: the misuse of the plea for insanity. First, we need to understand that the plea for insanity does not give a criminal a “get out of jail free” card. Many of the cases where the plea for insanity is used the criminal is forced to serve their time that would have been spent in jail in a mental institution instead.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. It is hard to imagine that serial murderers do not effectively use the insanity defense. Please explain: a) why isn 't it an effective defense? - The insanity defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to a persistent psychiatric disease. According to Danny Cevallos, who is a CNN Legal Analyst stated that: the insanity defense is raised in less than 1% of felony cases, and it 's only successful in a fraction of those; moreover, defendants judged to have been legally insane at the time of the offense and subsequently found not guilty by reason of insanity are in almost all cases indefinitely committed to psychiatric hospitals for treatment.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In our society today, the insanity defense starts a dispute seeing that those found not guilty by reason of insanity are treated leniently. A sane person who commits the same crime as an “insane” person could commit a horrible crime such as murder under the impression of a hallucination and can be sent to a mental hospital for a year then released and expected to be healthy. A sane person commits murder, same as insane person, would result in prison for five plus years. At least the mentally ill criminal would be getting help by nurses who care the patients well being. Resulting in lenientcy.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How do you feel about a defense that is made basically to allow a criminal justification over a crime they committed? Well thats the insanity defense for you. It has been around for over two-hundred years and since then it has had several reforms brought to it. It was brought around to help the mentally ill, allowing them to plead not guilty to a crime because they lacked the mental capacity to understand right from wrong or appreciate why what they did was wrong. Basically it states they aren’t criminally responsible for their actions; therefore they are sent to mental facilities to help treat their mental illness and not given prison or jail time.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper is going to compare and contrast the theories put forth from Terrie Moffitt (Dual Pathway Developmental Theory) and from Sampson & Laub (Age-Graded Developmental Theory). First we will look at what is similar in the two theories. They both are longitudinal studies, meaning that they take place with a fixed group of subjects who are monitored and data is gathered on for a specific time. The Dual Pathway Developmental Theory used data that was collected from New Zeland over the last forty-one years, and is still on going.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Criminology studies the reasoning and factors as to why individuals engage in criminal activities. In classical criminology, social philosophers Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham developed a theory of crime that criminologist and theorist still use today (Akers 2017). In classical criminology, an individual commits a crime by making a rational decision. That decision is based off of whether the benefits that one might receive by offending outweighs the consequences such as being caught and cited or sentenced. Individuals base their decision to offend or not offend on what they have seen others suffer, their knowledge of what consequences they may endure and their own personal experiences.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminal Psychology Introduction: Criminal psychology is the study of the intentions and behaviours of criminals. Criminologists apply psychology to crime in order for them to uncover the criminals reasoning for committing the crime. This is not a job that many people know about but I believe that it is a very important job so that the police and other agencies have information about what and who they are dealing with. I had a short limited amount of prior knowledge about this topic but from researching it further I have accumulated much more information and have created 3 key questions that I will be exploring. First I will be analysing the question How can criminal psychology help the criminal justice system and other agencies deal with…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics