Summary Of Meditation By Rene Descartes

Improved Essays
The Meditations, by Rene Descartes have been continuously debated about throughout history, with much of their content still considered controversial today. In the first Meditation, Descartes questions whether we can indeed be certain of seemingly truthful things. In the passage of interest, Descartes explains his reasoning for this uncertainty by describing one’s perception of objects possibly being wrong, and of one being deceived about accepted truthful thoughts. Descartes uses these base arguments throughout Meditation I in an attempt to establish certain truths.

The first part of Descartes’ argument in the passage is that no one can be certain that the objects that are seen, sensed and believed are in fact real. In the first premise of this argument, Descartes states that for the purposes of the argument, it must be supposed that there is a God, or some such being, that created humankind, and so is in control of the mind and thoughts of all people. Descartes goes on to argue that supposing that there is this superior being that is in control of each person’s thoughts, then the individual could be forever being deceived. He explains that because of this, the individual cannot be sure that the world, or any extended thing, by which is meant corporeal or physical objects, in or
…show more content…
He explains that the reason humankind cannot be sure of these things is because the all powerful being may have created existence so that all corporeal objects are but a perception of the human mind, and that they do not exist in any real, physical sense. This idea is supported

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We will begin by analyzing the Meditations by Descartes that he makes and what they mean. We will look at the many of the themes that are present in his meditations. We will then move onto looking at the dialogue between Ponens, Nous, and Tollens. We will express their objections to the Meditations. Finally we will conclude with the argument that is most convincing.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This meditation begins with the narrator reflecting on his past and realizing that he has a built up and accepted many falsehoods and he decides to sweep the slate clean and look at everything with new opinions and build on his knowledge from new foundations. From the narrator’s perspective, our senses are known to deceive us and that we must never completely trust something that has deceived us. At the end of his first meditation, Descartes believes that he has successfully shown that every conclusion we form or thing that we think we know can have at least one doubt that one may argue. In proving this, he finds doubt in things that we all perceive to be undoubtedly true. The first thing we all believe to know without a doubt is when we are…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    René Descartes’s argument in the Second Meditation of Meditations on First Philosophy, normally referred to as the Cogito, after its Latin formulation cogito ergo sum (‘I think, therefore I am’), is arguably the most famous one in all of philosophy and can be considered as origin of modern philosophy. His premise ‘I am, I exist’ (p.21) , which he ambitiously sets out to prove in this Meditation, does not explicitly take this form though. His meditation is thinking about thinking and affirming that thinking equals being. This essay will present and analyse Descartes’s argument in detail and explain that one can be sure that the ‘I’ exists and what the ‘I’ is. Then, it will examine how one comes to know the true nature of an object.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Demon Argument

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes’ first meditation centres around the controversial argument as to whether human behaviour, actions, and judgements are from a normal, seemingly truthful reality or if they are being controlled by an external falsehood creator. He, himself, attempts to decipher what is “absolutely certain” within his life by only permitting true beliefs to exist within his belief set while completely annihilating any form of uncertain, fabricated knowledge from any external force. By demolishing his previous perceptions and values, it is evident that Descartes believes that his senses may sometimes deceive and perplex himself to whether his behaviour and actions remain within his own jurisdiction. This sense of doubt is justified as he eventually arrives…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas of truth and falsity are familiar concepts that pertain to any number discussion topics, especially those regarding higher power and error. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he seeks to validate his own thoughts, ideas, and beliefs through reasoning, and in doing so raises questions about the existence of God and the sources for error. Through the course of his argument, his premises and conclusions debate these topics, which allows the Meditations to be followed as a sequence of arguments. However, on the path of the argument, Descartes’ logic can be called into question, as well as his methods of distinction. As Descartes attempts to verify his previous knowledge, he causes his own arguments to be thrown into doubt.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, I will summarize the background of the Second Meditation that Descartes uses to explain his claim. Second, I will express my opinions concerning why Descartes’ argument is convincing. Third, I will make known an objection to Descartes’ claim, and then argue why is it incorrect. Descartes begins his Second Meditation by saying yesterday’s meditation, which is the First Meditation, has left him doubting his beliefs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will explain Rene Descartes’ response from his Sixth Meditation to his dreaming argument from the First Meditation. Descartes’ Meditations are the processes of thinking that he attempted to create a stronger basis for our ways of thinking by doubting on various beliefs that are skeptical. In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes found an answer to his doubt and used that to refute his first premise of the dreaming argument. He knew that he could actually tell the different whether he was dreaming or not by matching the information he perceived and tracing it back to his memory. I will first introduce Descartes’ dreaming argument and then explain why the premises in his dreaming arguments are valid.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes has written six meditations on First Philosophy, with some being more important than the other. The third meditation does seem to stand out among the rest as the most important. The goal of this meditation is to find out if there is a God and whether or not God is a deceiver. After reading the third meditation, you take a step back to realize the importance of what the meditation had uncovered. There are different types of Ideas, which might not seem so important to the whole meditation but they are the basic building block.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays