The Argument Against Zombie Warfare

Ever since, the dawn of the past history, warfare had the strength to destroy the human being and their emotions. There was no time, where the world was without warfare. Thousands of people lose their lives due to warfare. Even now, the rate of people’s deaths has not reduced by a pinch. Whenever the theme of warfare comes into people’s mind, it reminds them of the past and now, how people suffered from war battles and the loss of humans and wild habitat. The main reason for building warfare is also because of humans, especially the rulers and other politicians of different countries. People can have different thoughts on warfare, which can be either good or bad. The ones who think that warfare is a good choice for the world, are ones who gets advantage from warfare. …show more content…
Eventhough, if it’s good or bad, both aspects will affect civilians. Warfare is one of the biggest cause for the people to move abroad or to another place to stay safer, which make the society to have trouble with their day to day life. According to the book, “ to stop zombie war should be against zombie warfare because it can have accidental deaths, loss of wild habitat and environment and harm to the world peace, however, people respond to warfare in many different ways”. In most interviews taking place in this book, people from different parts of the world says to bring back world peace and stop the bloodshed of innocent civilians. However, in very few interviews, people agree with warfare against zombies. Throughout the book, it shows how people develop their thoughts on warfare in different paths as will now be