Animal experimentation Humans depend on controversy to obtain an ominous view of all the facts to make an educated decision. While many humans can never unanimously agree on a whole heartedly ethically inclined decision, it can help create progress especially in cases of animal cruelty. Although many people are against animal cruelty, the controversy is dictated to people’s opinions on whether animal experimentation is more helpful or more harmful. Animal experimentation is incredibly controversial, many people believe animals are suffering just so humans can test medications and other products on them. While other people believe drugs and cosmetics need to be tested on animals before humans use or consumption. They are for animal experimentation
…show more content…
While on the contrary for other people who believe animal lives should not be valued as highly as humans and hurting them is a small factor in improving the wellbeing of humans. Although many cultures believe animal violence should be dismissed there are cultures that believe animals do not have feelings and are only on the planet to serve humans. All the ways people perceive animal violence and experimentation are dependent on how they are presented it throughout their lives. While the media plays and inarguable role in how it affects people, it is also the environment that they are placed in that can create a withstanding moral factor. In the novel, The World of The Image the author Anne Barry states “Today the picture that young people have in their mind is filled with holistic views of violence both as entertainment and as an unavoidable fact of everyday life. In the end, the combination of the two persuasive attitudes-the entertainment values and its inevitability- have worked to desensitize people to violence and rob them of a sense of control over their …show more content…
An article by Alexander Zambrano agrees animal testing is an effective method in helping people, he states “Furthermore, since the results of animal research generally give us reliable information that we can apply to treat human beings and since there are no better alternatives to animal experimentation that might lead us to cure various human diseases and illnesses, it follows that animal experimentation is morally justified.” On the other hand, men, such as Archana Patidar believe there are effective alternatives including epidemiological studies (studies of human populations), clinical research, in vitro (e.g., in a test tube) research, in silico (computer-based) techniques, human cell and tissue cultures, stem cell methods, advanced imaging methods, and safe human-based studies (International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences pg. 79). Controversy over animal experimentation is very important because if people didn’t ask questions they would be in the same place they were years ago. Through asking questions and creating controversy can they begin to explore different ideas of technology and further the educational process. It is expressly important for animal experimentation because it draws into question a matter of animal rights and how far
While on the contrary for other people who believe animal lives should not be valued as highly as humans and hurting them is a small factor in improving the wellbeing of humans. Although many cultures believe animal violence should be dismissed there are cultures that believe animals do not have feelings and are only on the planet to serve humans. All the ways people perceive animal violence and experimentation are dependent on how they are presented it throughout their lives. While the media plays and inarguable role in how it affects people, it is also the environment that they are placed in that can create a withstanding moral factor. In the novel, The World of The Image the author Anne Barry states “Today the picture that young people have in their mind is filled with holistic views of violence both as entertainment and as an unavoidable fact of everyday life. In the end, the combination of the two persuasive attitudes-the entertainment values and its inevitability- have worked to desensitize people to violence and rob them of a sense of control over their …show more content…
An article by Alexander Zambrano agrees animal testing is an effective method in helping people, he states “Furthermore, since the results of animal research generally give us reliable information that we can apply to treat human beings and since there are no better alternatives to animal experimentation that might lead us to cure various human diseases and illnesses, it follows that animal experimentation is morally justified.” On the other hand, men, such as Archana Patidar believe there are effective alternatives including epidemiological studies (studies of human populations), clinical research, in vitro (e.g., in a test tube) research, in silico (computer-based) techniques, human cell and tissue cultures, stem cell methods, advanced imaging methods, and safe human-based studies (International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences pg. 79). Controversy over animal experimentation is very important because if people didn’t ask questions they would be in the same place they were years ago. Through asking questions and creating controversy can they begin to explore different ideas of technology and further the educational process. It is expressly important for animal experimentation because it draws into question a matter of animal rights and how far