The “game” surrounding Fourth Amendment today has drawn focus to how law enforcement itself handles the process of search and seizure, rather than how the court is the active body in determining where search and seizure is usable. In addition, there is a great contradiction posed by the groups supporting the constitutional rights of American citizens who then turn around and authorize the means to grant unwarranted entry and searching into the private lives of said citizens, such as, but not entirely limited to, the PATRIOT Act and the National Security Agency’s PRISM …show more content…
To handle the eventual happenings of what the Constitution does not expressly address in the courts, it is best to ponder and determine how said situations can be handled before the problems surrounding them are ever brought up. In doing so, rather than taking a reactionary and emotionally charged approached as to how handle different court cases, we can best use the Constitution as the model for anticipating and solving problems in a way that does not involved turning more power over to the federal government that could ultimately trump the provisions of the document in due