4th Amendment Vs Fourth Amendment

Improved Essays
The law making body of the United States government has consistently paved the way for odd and near incomprehensible pieces of legislation which in turn could be argued that such laws have strayed far away from what the intentions of the United States Constitution originally were. In addition, and quite greatly in contrast, the evolution of what mankind’s freedom to create has produced some of the best, and worst, of the human race. It becomes rather stressful and harrowing to figure out where to draw the line on what the Constitution is supposed to cover. With the advent of the digital age and the ability to disseminate controversial and dangerous materials, the possibility of a completely unwatched and uncontrolled general society can be …show more content…
The “game” surrounding Fourth Amendment today has drawn focus to how law enforcement itself handles the process of search and seizure, rather than how the court is the active body in determining where search and seizure is usable. In addition, there is a great contradiction posed by the groups supporting the constitutional rights of American citizens who then turn around and authorize the means to grant unwarranted entry and searching into the private lives of said citizens, such as, but not entirely limited to, the PATRIOT Act and the National Security Agency’s PRISM …show more content…
To handle the eventual happenings of what the Constitution does not expressly address in the courts, it is best to ponder and determine how said situations can be handled before the problems surrounding them are ever brought up. In doing so, rather than taking a reactionary and emotionally charged approached as to how handle different court cases, we can best use the Constitution as the model for anticipating and solving problems in a way that does not involved turning more power over to the federal government that could ultimately trump the provisions of the document in due

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jeffery Toobin Analysis

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As two individuals that practice law, Richard A. Bierschbach and Jeffery Toobin, who are two distinctively different authors have very similar views on the United States Constitution. Richard A. Bierschbach and Jeffery Toobin have composed two compelling articles on the United States Constitution. In Richard A. Bierschbach’s “Fragmentation and Democracy in The Constitutional Law of Punishment” and Jeffery Toobin’s “Our Broken Constitution” their rhetorical strategy to persuade know their audience very well. Toobin writes for the average reader who mainly wants a quick way to learn about a topic. Bierschbach is writing to educate people who are practicing law or professor to teach college students.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As our forefathers departed England to establish this new land, one of the original drivers was to allow many individual freedoms that were not allowed in England. Therefore, the U. S. Constitution was created to give the people freedoms that were not allowed in England and also to provide protections not provided for in their type of government. The tensions and conflict arose in the process of balancing the needs for individual freedoms with the need for the overall rule of law in the new nation. The difficulty is how individual rights are executed without the infringement on another person’s rights.…

    • 3876 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the federal level, the Constitution set a division among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; locally the government must be granted permission by the state and the governing bodies are directly elected by the people. In total it left the maximum amount of freedom in the hands of individuals. This being said, a common concern among many in today’s society is whether or not a document that was written 229 years ago can still remain relevant in a world that is frequently changing. The Constitutions relevancy is based on the fact that it is a living document written with the possibility of amendments that allows for interpretation by the judicial system, that its purpose is to protect against dictatorship and usurping of power brought up by Anti-Federalist fears, and that it ultimately serves as a protective barrier for citizens’ civil…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the creation of the constitution, the world around us has changed tremendously. What may have seemed normal in 1787, has drastically changed over time. As the times of the world have passed and the modern age of American civilization have developed through the sciences and industrialization, so have the circumstances involving the interpretation of this ageless document. Through adaptation, there are two ways to apply the context of the constitution to modern times. The first is to Amend the constitution and the other is to apply a living constitution methodology.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I would propose changes in the Fourth Amendment. The changes will be to protect from unreasonable searches and seizures on the inside and outside of the border. The reason is that there were thousands of cases where Homeland Security Agents would seize and search mobile devices right outside the border. Because the Fourth Amendment only protects people inside the border, the agents were free to search, copy, and record any information from the devices without explanation. If the government allows this to continue it will lose trust in the public.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the shortest, longest standing, and most ambiguous constitutions in the world. This document establishes a democratic republic of many states under one federal government. In outlining the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the government and how they relate to state governments, many questions are left unanswered. Though this constitution outlines legislation’s role fairly clearly, it is far too vague concerning executive and judicial roles and the relationship between state and federal government.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The goal of this amendment is to protect people’s privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, the fourth amendment is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government has used a relaxed approach to the Fourth Amendment. After September 11th, 2001, Congress enabled the Patriot Act in order to prevent future attacks from terrorists and protect the United States from other threats. The Patriot Act, as the Department of Justice states, provides “law enforcement with new tools to detect and prevent terrorism” (the U.S. Patriot Act: Preserving Life and Liberty) allowing them to access the information that is necessary for terrorist investigations and making it easier to prevent attacks. The Patriot Act also states that law enforcement is authorized to “obtain a search warrant anywhere a terrorist-related activity occurred”, which means that if there is evidence of terrorist activity, law enforcement is able to investigate. This involves the examination of personal records such as phone records and other personal records.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fourth amendment is important to all Americans and it is one of the most important amendments. The fourth amendment is important because it protects Americans from unreasonable search and seizure. “To protect Americans from the government invading our privacy and looking through our things, then finding evidence that might be used against us to convict Americans of crimes, the colonials put in the fourth amendment to free Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures.” (“Fourth Amendment with English captions”) The Fourth Amendment is: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism and Gun Control Gun control in the United States has been a controversial topic for a number of years. The different ways in which one can interpret the constitution plays a big role in the controversy between whether certain gun control laws violate your civil liberties as citizens of the United States. There have been numerous court cases dealing with gun control, with some of the major including: District of Columbia Vs. Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, the United States has managed to maintain a balance between its institutional powers and personal rights of its citizens. The US constitution has undergone multiple amendments aimed at providing more freedom while the same time protects the national interests. Recently conducted studies revealed that the majority of Americans feel threaten by the decisions made by the federal government (DePlato, 2015). The paper evaluates institution powers and personal rights that the legislature should consider upholding, eliminating, or adding in a bid to balance between personal rights and national interests. The Most Important Institutional Power and Personal Right…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays