The Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
The Anti-federalists pushed for the Bill of right to be included in the U.S. Constitution to attempt preventing an overbearing central government. The Constitution created by the Federalists was claimed to be written by aristocrats withholding rights to personal liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists feared that this might lead to an aristocratic tyranny where power would be held only by those with time, power, and wealth (Shelley, Schmidt, & Bardes, 2015). While Anti-Federalists were against such strong powers of the central government, they agreed that certain aspects of states’ governments should be equally upheld through federal legislation. The Anti-federalists believed implementing higher national power under the correct guidelines …show more content…
The argument by the federalists against a bill of rights was that the powers not granted to the national government were held up by the states and people within them. While this was true, many states called for greater constitutional protection of individuals placing specific prohibitions on government power. In compliance to these requests James Madison tried to make appropriate changes directly to the Constitution itself, but was not given the authority to change its wording. As a result Madison’s addition was brought forth as a list of amendments to be approved by the government ( ENGAGE, 2011). The states quickly ratified ten of these liberty protecting amendments which became known as the Bill of Rights. Some of the most important civil liberties outlined by the Bill of Rights are freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to bear …show more content…
Once the Bill of Rights incorporation was in place there have been numerous occasions of the Supreme Court upholding our civil liberties against the government. One example of such a case was Roe v. Wade in 1973 protecting a woman’s right to receive and abortion. In this case the Supreme Court declared that a woman’s constitutionally protected right to privacy includes the right to have an abortion. While upholding the freedom of women’s rights, they create a more concrete line declaring that states cannot restrict the right to an abortion during the first three months of pregnancy. A second case of the Supreme Court protecting our liberties comes up in 1925 in the Gitlow V. New York case. The ruling was such that state government cannot infringe on our freedom of speech. A third example of the Supreme Court defending our rights was in the case of Engel V. Vitale. The issue concerned the use of the “Regent’s Prayer” in New York public schools. In this case the Supreme Court ruled that it is no business of the government to compose official prayers for any group of American people to recite(Shelley, Schmidt, & Bardes,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Patrick Henry Dbq

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patrick Henry at a Debate in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5 1788, and James Madison, in the Federalist, Number 10, 1787 represent two different perspectives on the ratification of the constitution. Anti-federalists and federalists were opposing forces in the ratification process. Anti-federalists wanted to prevent the constitution from being ratified while the federalists favored a strong central government and the passage of the constitution. Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the constitution. They feared the constitution could lead to autocratic tyranny.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution. In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; “The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands” (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494). He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (Hammond, Hardwick, &…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists sought a weak central government that was completely different form Britain’s tyranny, insisted that the Constitution could lead the country to political corruption, and believed that the three branches of government gave too much power to the central government. The Anti-Federalists’ main issue with the Constitution was that it did not discuss personal liberties, such as those described during the enlightenment period. James Madison proposed twelve amendments of which ten were approved. The ten amendments were named the Bill of Rights. The Virginia Declaration of Rights, written by George Mason, influenced the Bill of Rights by promoting the natural rights of the people and that the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anti- Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty” (Bill of Rights Institute, "Bill of Rights of the United States of America…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was the product of the Anti-Federalists and the Federalists debates. These two groups fiercely disagreed more over the means than the ends. Both sides acknowledged that a stronger national authority was needed and that such an authority required an independent source of revenue to function properly. They also both agreed that safeguards against tyranny need to be established. But, they disagreed on whether the enumeration of federal power would by itself serve to restrain the national government within those powers.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq Essay

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to History.com, the Bill of Rights is the symbol of what lies at the heart of American idea of individual liberty, limited government, and the rule of law. The Bill of Rights was created to protect the citizens but was not considered important until supporters of the Constitution saw it was pivotal to ratify it. James Madison, the fourth president, was able to make the Bill of Rights officially became part of the Constitution in December 1791 (2009). With the Bill of Rights in place along with the rest of the Constitution, many supreme court cases had arise from citizens fighting for their rights. A prime example involved students John and Mary Beth Tinker with a friend in December 1965.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments of the Constitution. It was created to exclude governmental power to citizen rights. The Bill of Rights, is a protection for an individual’s liberty. Built for a person’s freedom of speech, religion, and press. It arranges rules for due process of law and reserves all power not substituted to the Federal Government, to the people or the states, but imagine if the government stops granting you those rights, striping them away from you.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had the better argument overall because they had clear instances showing how a strong central government could become corrupt and lose interest in its citizens. They wanted the power to stay in the states because it would allow more control over what was happening within the nation and it would give citizens more protected rights. In the end, after several debates between the groups, they agreed on creating the Bill of Rights, which gave the citizens protected rights. In addition, they agreed on forming one central government that was made up of three branches, all with restricted powers because of the checks and balances between them.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays