The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…
The EU and Russia are divided at the moment, and they are becoming more polarized to each other, as they approach each other’s dominions. The EU wishes to strength its group, while adding more countries to its ranks, and decreasing the power of Russia. Russia sees their advances on its former territories and “President Putin saw this new step of westernization occurring in the redefined "Eastern Europe" as an "assault" against Russian strategic interests and decided to combat the process of rapprochement between these states and the European Union” (Naumescu). Russia is getting weaker as oil prices drop, and as they lose their interests to the west, but as they use violence and no diplomacy to act on their own selfish needs, the international community or NATO will get involved. The hostile annexing of Crimea is still not recognized internationally.…
He develops his arguments by relating to thinking about how people think and idea-based explanations of why things work or happen the way they do and the opinions of different history experts. However, he seems to have be bias by presenting the United States as the innocent party while the Soviet Union is the Evil Empire. Despite these faults, the argument is forceful well researched and supported by excellent governmental information that was received storehouses of old…
The end of the Cold War remains a fervently debated topic in political science. Disagreements in this study of the Cold War largely stem from questioning what factors contributed, an in to degree, to ending the Cold War. To answer these questions, it proves necessary to examine just what exactly was the Cold War, along with when did it end, as we attempt to better understand its conclusion. During this analysis, we discover one of the main disagreements over what factors led to the end of the Cold War, which proceeds from two theories of international relations: realism and constructivism. Were material factors, such economic stagnation and declining political power in the Soviet Union, the main cause of the Soviet government ending its interventionist…
Louisiana Purchase International relations is driven by many things with those things being theories, these theories then for the international events that in turn formed the modern state system that is in place today. The Louisiana Purchase was an even that occurred mainly between France and The United States with some relations with Spain. The Louisiana Purchase and the realist point of view it was completed from was one of the many events that helped formed today’s modern state system. The Louisiana Purchase was a deal between France and The United States that led to the exchange of a large portion of land in the Western hemisphere. France explored the land around the Mississippi River and settled in many different places around the region…
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in late December 1979, marked a turning point for the Cold War in the United States. The Soviet Union had sent thousands of troops into Afghanistan, and they quickly assumed political and military control of Kabul and other large portions of the country. This overt display of Soviet force formally ended the period of détente that had been used by Nixon and Ford. The invasion was significant because it was the first time the Soviet Union had invaded a country outside of the Eastern Bloc. The expansion of Communism was a key issue that faced the United States.…
Kennan regards the Soviet Union as still rooted in Marxist ideology, but to strengthen the power and status. Consequently, international relations between the Soviet Union and other states have become hostile and fraught with secretiveness about internal policies and other weaknesses, to keep states such as the US wary of their power. Thus Kennan deduces that polarity between American and Soviet ideologies means that co-operation between the two superpowers would be unlikely for some time. The infallibility of the Kremlin, and the nature of the oppressive rule led to insecurity and a need to strengthen power through the exploitation of the population, manipulation of truths, installation of fear and propaganda.…
I believe that both geopolitics and philosophy are not only of great interest, but are also very useful supplemental knowledge that will assist me in better understanding the individual, domestic and systemic components that compel people within a society to make distinct business choices. The level of critical thinking required from these fields of study necessitates and fosters a mind free of biases which is pertinent when one desires to optimize the unique and valuable lessons that can be learned through diversity.…
This story answers a lot of questions about Putin. People struggled trying to figure out what drives the man who has ruled and reigned over Russia for 16 years now. When Putin came to power in 2000 and went to war in Chechnya, questions sparked about why would Putin or how could Putin? Well here we have some answers on how he likes to see himself.…
Nick Sherman Professor Asal Political science 102 9/27/16 In the wake of 9/11 The United States, The United Kingdom, and many other nations formed a coalition against the Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein. The coalition force invaded in 2003 to overthrow Saddam’s dictatorship and establish a democratic state in the Middle East. Although in some instances realism can describe the invasion of Iraq, the theory of Liberalism best describes the invasion because of liberal notions such as collective security and the belief that cooperation can lead to beneficial outcomes to all involved.…
Realism and Liberalism are theories in international politics that have different levels of analysis. Nevertheless, many key differences and similarities go hand in hand when talked about the Post World War II. Realism is a theory essentially about power and security. Many political actors and states view the world as a dangerous place and only the strong will survive.…
Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…
The most consistent with the reality in the Arctic is the theory of Neoliberalism, which is especially helpful in explaining Russia’s behavior of cooperation whilst increasing its military capabilities in the…
After Waltz opened the door in the structural theory, other neorealists created theories to build on top of Waltz’s foundation. One in particular, John Mearsheimer, agreed with almost everything that Waltz said, except for his stance on security. In Waltz’s neorealism theory, he spoke about the security dilemma, and how that shapes a states foreign policy, and how they, in turn acts towards others. Mearsheimer offers the offensive realism theory, which is the opposite to the defensive theory that Waltz came up with. Although both theories have more in common with each other than they do different, it shows how one tweak can change an entire idea, and make you question a states existence.…
Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…