Pros And Cons Of Pas

Improved Essays
Much like Brittany, and many others that have made similar statements in similar situations, I believe that everyone has moral right to do as they please with their life as long as there is no harm done to anyone else. This includes PAS. When someone cannot end their own life in a dignified way when they so choose because of a disability or disease, they should have the right to the help of a physician. This right if requested should then be respected especially when it comes to painful terminal illnesses. In fact denying such a request to me seems cruel. It seems cruel to make someone live in pain and suffering even if it is a short while. I also believe in order to prevent innocent deaths there needs to be strict laws in place to safeguard individuals from false requests of PAS. I also realize in theory PAS may seem like a good idea but as we go deeper into discussion PAS may not be the most practical process. On the flip side I can see how some may oppose PAS from a religious stand point since many religions, especially Catholics, believe that those who commit suicide go to hell; although it could be …show more content…
I then would discuss with them the pros and cons of PAS. First, we would discuss whether they have been diagnosed with a terminal disease, how much pain they are in and other possible options. Secondly, whether the state we were in was a Death with Dignity state. If not do we have the finances to move or find another option. Once there request was official, if not mandatory, I would personally request a psychiatric review for my said family member to confirm no mental illness is present and that they are in fact in extreme pain. I think I would try to have a discussion with them to make sure they were in no way coerced by anyone, that someone had not made them feel like such a burden that they need to go through with this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Emmanuel has placed many facts into this source to support the legalization of PAS. I will cite, from this source, one such fact. “Each year, approximately 2.3 million Americans die” (632). Emmanuel has estimated that only 50 percent of this number will die in a manner that they would be able to request PAS or euthanasia (632). He also cites that in many deaths, patients would not be considered competent enough to request PAS (632).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main point on opposition comes from the principle of beneficence (doing good). A patient who chooses to kill them self is fundamentally going against everything that the health care system stands for. They also argue that a person who is suffering from chronic illness will have some mental impairment, whether it is intense depression or anxiety (P. 276). All and all, Rich and Butts (2004) adds a balanced and practical two sided argument for and against PAS. They reiterate that "rational suicide is a morally ambiguous issue" (P. 277).…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The patient should have every right to have their lives taken in order to be able to have their families see them in their optimal state before they are incoherent. Not only should…

    • 3123 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each patient should be able to receive as best of an equal treatment as others would. So, if a patient with a terminal illness opts out of treatments that would prolong their life with more pain and less dignifying loss of independence to be treated equally, they should be offered physician assisted-suicide treatment. This treatment would be the best option that would equal other treatments offered to similar patients, but just don 't prolong their life. This also pertains to treating the patient fairly and with respect to the wishes he/she chooses. Not becoming bias, if say, a 35-year-old patient with a terminal illness decides physician-assisted suicide over a clinical trial treatment and a nurse thinks that the patient is still so young and in his/her prime years, should be taking treatment over physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover,the logic of decriminalizing PAS for the terminally ill who are suffering grievously would lead inexorably to allowing other types of killing. If the rational for PAS is to respect autonomy,then why limit it to those are terminally ill?Why privilege the autonomy of those who are suffering and terminally ill above those who are suffering chronically? If the rational for PAS is that person is in misery or has allegedly lost her dignity-if,for such people,death is a benefit-then it will be impossible to deny this alleged benefit to those who lack decision making capacity,those who are unconscious, or demented, or too young to have such capacity. Thus out of respect for life,and out of compassion and care for the elderly,dying and disabled,PAS…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agreeing to the process of PAS, shows terminally ill patients their live is not worth living. PAS communicates to the vulnerable, that by poor example, other patients will choose death as a benefit, over life that has become miserable to them. Physicians should not give up completely on the patient if their is no possible cure. The patient should die naturally with emotional support, be provided with a sufficient amount of pain control and keep a well communicated relationship with their physician and family. Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The patients should be allowed to have a physicians assisted suicide because of how much the patient suffers. They undergoes physical, emotional, and psychological pain during treatments. Cathleen Kaveny from Gale database says, “The term euthanasia in…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They argue that patients with terminal conditions should have the right to end their lives quickly instead of slowly wasting away, often in great pain. This argument obscures another right that is given when PAS is legalized. As Dr. Peter Saunders, General Secretary of CMF UK, writes, legalizing euthanasia gives “doctors a legal right to kill”. This right is a direct contradiction to the mission of doctors. The profession of doctors is to cure the diseases of their patients, not to end their lives.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have been suffering long enough. They deserve a way out, to tell their families a proper good bye and die on their own accord. People do not deserve to be forced to live like that. There will always be those who oppose PAS. This may be on moral grounds, religious grounds or ethical grounds but in the end it is what the victim wants.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide is only a way to end a patient’s life is pain and suffering, and as long as they end their life themselves, there is nothing wrong with…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person is terminally or chronically ill they should have the right to physician assisted suicide. These ill people who are of sound mind and judgment should have the right to die peacefully and with assistance if this is what they choose to do. The choice should be theirs and they should not have to suffer more than necessary, they should be able to save their family the financial ruin and they should be able to leave this earth is in a dignified manner, free of pain. Jack Kevorkian was a Pathologist who lived in Michigan where assisted suicide was not legal. The fact that it was not legal did not stop him from assisting those in need.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    it’s unfair to let a fellow man suffer from something that you could get read of at any time. “The U.S Supreme Court ruled that physicians-assisted-suicide is not a protected liberty interest under the constitution.” This quote explains that that it’s not taken under the government as a protection scenario. “The American Medical Association suggest that passive euthanasia is accepted but not without controversy.” (CNN reporter?)An individual has the right to: not receive medical attention/medical treatment, turning off respirators, stopping food or water or no resuscitation.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If people have the right to abort a pregnancy due to complications or simply because the pregnancy is unwanted, then a terminally ill person should have the right to end their agony. Why should one termination be frowned upon more than the others? By enacting the Death with Dignity law in every state, individuals are given a sense of control of their lives; furthermore, it gives them assurance that their love ones will not have to witness them…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am one of many people who believe that life is precious and every second of it should be appreciated. When questioned about whether one person should be able to assist in another’s suicide legally, I feel I would have a hard time answering that. The answer really entirely depends on the situation the person is in. Do they want to leave the world just because something bad has happened or are they suffering from severe pain? To be able to commit an assisted suicide, I think the person who assists in the suicide as well as the one who wants to suicide should go through a certain deduction process to see if they can do it legally.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you were lying in a hospital bed and you and your loved ones are being informed that your life has taken a turn for the worse, which has impacted your quality of life forever by having a terminal illness. Are you willing to make a decision to take the easy way out? What would your choice be? Do we truly have the right to cross the fine lines of life and death? Do you think we have the right to decide who gets to live and who doesn’t?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays