The concern among historians is not one of the sources was present at the battle. In an article by Jonna Lendering, she discusses the four authors, giving some insight and background to their versions. Velleius Paterculus, an officer in the Roman army, wrote an account but his relationship with Tiberius, the future leader, may have resulted in bias. Paterculus wrote Roman History Dedicated to Marcus Vinicius 20 years after the battle and allegedly talked to survivors. Cornelius Tacitus wrote another depiction. Lendering claims he may have written a “masterpiece,” but he most likely took his descriptions of the battle from Pliny’s History of the Germanic Wars. While the facts may be true, they are third-person accounts at best. Publius Ammius Florus wrote the third account, but he inserts his own opinions. Nonetheless, he does blame Augustus for the loss, so his writings are likely not just propaganda. Cassius Dio, the youngest of the authors, wrote what Lendering claims may be the most accurate description. While not the most exciting writer, Dio took great care to use accurate sources. When looking at the creative license, lack of eye-witness accounts, and potential bias found within the writings available, it becomes clear that these primary sources may serve as a guideline but not the sole sources of
The concern among historians is not one of the sources was present at the battle. In an article by Jonna Lendering, she discusses the four authors, giving some insight and background to their versions. Velleius Paterculus, an officer in the Roman army, wrote an account but his relationship with Tiberius, the future leader, may have resulted in bias. Paterculus wrote Roman History Dedicated to Marcus Vinicius 20 years after the battle and allegedly talked to survivors. Cornelius Tacitus wrote another depiction. Lendering claims he may have written a “masterpiece,” but he most likely took his descriptions of the battle from Pliny’s History of the Germanic Wars. While the facts may be true, they are third-person accounts at best. Publius Ammius Florus wrote the third account, but he inserts his own opinions. Nonetheless, he does blame Augustus for the loss, so his writings are likely not just propaganda. Cassius Dio, the youngest of the authors, wrote what Lendering claims may be the most accurate description. While not the most exciting writer, Dio took great care to use accurate sources. When looking at the creative license, lack of eye-witness accounts, and potential bias found within the writings available, it becomes clear that these primary sources may serve as a guideline but not the sole sources of