The Analysis Of Aristotle's Use Of Eudaimonia

Superior Essays
Aristotle said Eudaimonia is the excellent performance of the human ergon. Eudaimonia is roughly translated as happiness from Greek, but it is more than fleeting psychological gratification, which is today’s cultural understanding of happiness. Aristotle used Eudaimonia to describe human flourishing. Ergon, translated from Greek, means function. This function involves both what something does and how it does it. Spoons and forks both help us eat, but they do it in different ways. It would be extremely difficult to eat soup with a fork. Because they have different methods, they have different ergons. Aristotle believed the human ergon was more than the sum of the ergons of the body. The heart’s ergon is to pump blood, the spine’s ergon is to keep the body upright, etc. Living is the sum of these ergons. Aristotle believed the human ergon was more than life and could be found in how people live.
Aristotle argued the human ergon is related to what is uniquely human. Human uniqueness cannot be biological. Every DNA strand, regardless of species, is composed of the same four nucleotides. He concluded the distinction between humans and animals was the human ability to
…show more content…
The universe can be examined with the assumption that humans are uniquely rational on Earth. Our solar system has three bodies with the potential for life: Earth, Mars, and Europa. Conservatively, every solar system has one body with life potential and 1% of those actually sustain life. There are more than 500 solar systems in the Milky Way Galaxy. In the universe, there are roughly 100 billion galaxies, which means 5x1013 solar systems. Therefore, there are 5x1011 bodies with life in the universe. Earth has around 8.74 million species, animals and plants. If that is rounded to 10 million, the odds of having a rational life form are .00001%. This means there are 50 thousand bodies with rational life in the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Reply to Objection 1: Parmenides, your notion of being is too strong. When it comes to the definition of being you provided, the idea that being cannot change is incorrect. Being can change while remaining the same, so the notion of something coming to be or passing away with change, would be incorrect, as I have stated in my response and given examples. Through potential and matter, nothing is coming to be or passing away, because it is still the same substance throughout. The form of the substance always had the potential to become the change, so nothing is coming to be and the substance is not passing away, but rather staying the same.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Longrigg discusses his belief that the treatment of Aristotle is rather symbolic. He argues that there is a problematic inconsistency in Aristotle’s description of the elements physical and biological works. Longrigg further argues that the discrepancy may be the result of the influence of the Hippocratic and Sicilian medical theories. Longrigg discusses different comparisons and contrasts with Plato. He also praises Aristotle’s outstanding achievement in the commencement of the practice of systematic animal dissection within the Lyceum.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Aristotle’s belief was, you can only gain true knowledge through the senses, this making him an empiricist. Although the ideas are different, they both seek universal…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The original Euthyphro problem arose in ancient Greece where people, including the ones in the discussion, were Pantheists. The two main characters in the discussion were Euthyphro and Socrates. Socrates is famous for leading discussions by asking questions that were meant to get people to think. All we know about Socrates is through the writings of Plato, who was Socrates' pupil. From reading a translation of the original document it appears that Euthyphro was at the court to prosecute his father who had murdered a murderer.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enrico Fermi was a brilliant physicist who raised the question in during a social gathering in Los Alamos, New Mexico in 1943. Virtually everyone has asked this question at some point in their lives, wondering if we are alone in the universe. This has come to be known as “The Fermi Paradox”. The Fermi Paradox, although it predates the Drake Equation, exists because of the odds of alien life the equation brings light to. Created by Frank Drake, the Drake Equation’s purpose is to take estimates of many different factors of what makes life according to astrobiologists, and give a number of civilizations believed to have the possibility to exist and have the capabilities to communicate with us.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Are we alone in the universe? It is a question that many people have asked but no one has been able to answer as of yet but the proof is coming. It is statistically highly improbable that we can be the only life in this vast universe. There are trillions upon trillions of stars in the known universe and each has its own solar system so the odds of finding life are far from impossible. Just last year, NASA's Keppler mission comfirmed the first near-Earth-size planet in the "habitable zone" of a star similar to our own sun.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Red Star Research Paper

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a few million years, this could all change. This would make NASA sort of right about Mars. And Elon Musk really thinks ahead, although he will be long dead before Mars hits that sweet spot. Aliens Do Exist…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, under the prevalent assumption of galactic civilization creation and development, the absence of other life in the universe is highly unlikely. Probability is the root of the Fermi Paradox. In our universe, there are 100-200 billion…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For when a man dies, it is merely the body (the moral part) that dies, while the indestructible, deathless soul remains immortal. True, for Aristotle, the soul cannot be immortal. Yet, he has not lost the ability to distinguish between the soul and the body, by claiming the soul cannot exist without the body. The soul and the body are yet distinguishable as form and actuality, and as matter and potentiality (respectively). What Aristotle offers us that is different, is a clearer understanding of soul and body as a…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    For Empedocles, the origin of organisms is an act brought on by chance, which can be defined as a “coincidental cause” (Physics 54). For Empedocles, it is important to note the importance of love and strife and the role these two elements play in the chance process. Before the origin of organisms, love out-ruled strife and there was a continuous harmony in the universe. However, Empedocles suggests that the spirits of the universe had become corrupt and strife’s power began to increase and overrule the power of love. The battle between love and strife is when the origin of organisms began (Waterfield 138).…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As of the 21st century, it is no longer controversial to believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life. While in the 16th century, a belief that life existed beyond Earth and its atmosphere may have led to a public execution (like it did for astronomer, Giordano Bruno), the same belief is held by 54% of Americans today. Given the evidence gathered through advanced space exploration and technology, the scientific community, as well as the general population, is more inclined to believe in extraterrestrial life. However, something that is more debatable, is the existence of intelligent extraterrestrial life.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ancient greeks consider eudaimonia or human flourishing as happiness because it is more of a declaration…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Aristotle defines and contrasts both practical and theoretical wisdom. Practical wisdom is defined by Aristotle as being, “a truthful rational characteristic of acting in matters involving what is good for man” (Aristotle Ethics, pg. 154). In other words, practical wisdom is concerned with deciding what a good course of action for man is. On the other hand about theoretical wisdom, Aristotle writes, “a wise man must not only know what follows from fundamental principles, but he must also have true knowledge of the fundamental principles themselves. Accordingly, theoretical wisdom must comprise both intelligence and scientific knowledge”(Aristotle Ethics, pg. 156).…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In doing this, one is able to differentiate humans from other beings in the world. Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher, states that what sets us apart from other animals is our rationality. In his work Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle outlines his concept of rational choice. By analyzing the characteristics that make humans stand out from other beings and describing the aspects of our rationality, one can explain and defend Aristotle’s notion of rational choice and the harmonious relationship it has with society and our responsibility for our character.…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of Aristotle’s function argument is to determine the function of the human being, in order to identify the true human good. The role of the argument in Aristotle’s investigation is to eliminate typical natures belonging to living species and determine the characteristic that is most unique to human life, which is ration. Then stating how human function is an activity of the soul, Aristotle uses his elimination method to state that in order for the human function to be performed well, that it must act in accordance with ration. It is useful to understand the concept of function as it applies to human beings because without it, we would not understand how it connects with our virtues and human good. Virtues, as Aristotle describes them, are best when they are complete and self-sufficient because we are pursuing them for no other reasons but themselves.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays