Description Of The Battle Of Confederacy

Superior Essays
In 1860s, because the fact of southern states wanted to remain the slavery stable while the North desired to abolish the slavery. Meanwhile Abraham Lincoln led the Union and fought with the Confederacy whose commander was Jefferson Davis. The goal of union was to protect the unity, but many armies were controlled by South, also they owned wide land. It seemed difficult for the Union troops to win the Confederacy drastically. Moreover, the strategy of Confederacy was only to defense, controlled the battleground still in North lands. They waited for the North crumbling from within, then they would have sufficient reason to persuade the Union to stop the Civil War (Goldfield, The American Journey: A History of the United State, P402). When …show more content…
It is well-known that the strategy of Confederacy was only to defense and controlled all the battles in North’s territory. For example, in March 1862, President Lincoln ordered General George McClellan, who commanded the Army of the Potomac, to attack Richmond. Meanwhile, General Robert E. Lee, who commanded Confederate troops, attacked McClellan`s right flank in June 25, 1862. This attack caused McClellan`s armies had to change their position to defense, and the Union could not occupy Richmond (Goldfield, P407). When the war began, the Union defeated Confederacy by a surprise action. The Union`s Navy obstructed the South`s waterway transport (Goldfield, P408).It directly caused economy of the South become more and more weak, and also caused food and other supplies shortages. Due to Union chose a better military strategy, not only fought the Confederacy on lands, but obstructed their waterway transport. It was a significant reason why the Union was able to win the war finally.
In conclusion, more resources, better military strategies, an excellent leader are the main reason to help the North win the war and protect the unity. So we can found that the resource is foundation to run the whole organization, and military strategies are the key to win every battle. Moreover, the leadership helped the America to become
…show more content…
The first one is Spain, so Spain led the whole Western Hemisphere to outlaw slavery (Goldfield, P286). In the United States, due to the demand for cotton, this triggered the largest internal migration that thousands of slave laborers moved, which has never occurred in the history of the world. As a result, Upper South slaveholders exported to the Lower South a large number of black laborers between 1790 and 1860. Lawmaker found there were large profits in trading slaves, rather than crop cultivation. Around 40 percent of African-Americans who were working in the Upper South, and they were compiled to work for the cotton economy. Primarily, they were sold through interstate; secondarily, their masters also transferred the slavers. In 1850, the Upper South started to free the slavers, called “free persons of color”. In Delaware, only 2 percent of people are slaver, 17 percent of people are free black. (Goldfield, P296) Passing Black codes trigger Africa-American became anger, which caused the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the Battle of Gettysburg, according to “The Killer Angels”, the southern generals made far too many mistakes that cost them the victory. In this battle, both sides made frequent mistakes, yet the South’s faults were far more fatal. These faults were the cause of the south’s loss of the battle, and the consequences that followed. The first disastrous mistake made by the South, was their faith in Jeb Stuart.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Jefferson Davis pursued a defensive strategy, he believed the northerners would soon become tired of war and let South withdraw from the Union. Lincoln used the superior human, economic, and natural resources of the North to repress the South into submission. In the first year, both leaders became highly frustrated. Lincoln's greatest frustration was military leadership. The Union troops were under Ulysses S. Grant control and with his help, they gained triumphs in the Mississippi Valley.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While America may have fought many wars before the Civil War, the Civil War was unique in that the two opposing sides of the war were parts of America in disagreement. The North, and The South. Against tremendous odds and opposition, the North won this Civil War and gave us the union we have today. But how did they accomplish this tremendous feat? The short answer, General Ulysses S Grant's competence as a military leader, the advantage of greater man and industrial power, and the leadership of President Lincoln.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ironclads in the Civil War The Civil War did not introduce the invention of the Ironclad war ship; however, it did widely expand its use as it proved to be an effective naval method during the war at sea. These ironclads were meant to be highly resistant from enemy shots as they were made of “iron-armored wooden hulls” (Harris). Moreover, the North used this tactic in order to blockade southern ports and gain access to the Mississippi River. Formally known as the Anaconda Plan, Winfield Scott designed it in order to ultimately destroy the already inadequate economy in the south, as they would lose all trade routes to their foreign traders like Britain.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When one thinks of the Civil War in the United States, the Union winning that war and how the deficiencies of the South plagued them are some concepts that would come to the mind. This was certainly the case for author David H. Donald in his book, Why the North Won the Civil War. The book consists of essays written by different historians explaining why they thought the Union won the war. The essays focused on a specific reason behind the victory of the Union. Of all the writers who contributed to Why the North Won the Civil War, David H. Donald presents the strongest thesis.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Time and Scene: A Southern plantation house, at night. It is the spring of 1864, one year before the Confederate Army’s surrender at Appomattox. Brothers Earl and Paul, fighting on opposite sides of the war, have both died in a recent battle. Union General Creon has requisitioned the plantation as his command post and has declared martial law. A bugle sounds in the distance as two Union soldiers enter from the right side of the scene.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons that the North won the Civil War was because blockade helped the North out. The Union had more men with which to fight and couldn’t afford to lose any men. This meant that not only was confederacy losing men to them being killed but, they also lost men to the prisons in two ways. The 1st one was that men become POWS (Prisoner Of War) and were not exchanged, so as to be likely to return to the battle line. The second one, was as prison guards.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the central reasons that the Civil War began was because of the different views on slavery in the United States. During this time, slavery was legal and was a vital part of the southern life. On the other side, in the North, slavery was not as important and slaves had more freedom and were treated more like humans than in the South. Northerners believed that slavery was unconstitutional and called for…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south had a small military force in which the north was able to overcome the force. The north had a bigger advantage is that the north had more industrial power in which they could produce more products to the military. Which was able to get ammo and their ammunition to the troops while they are fighting in the civil war. The north had more money as well which they were able to buy more supplies from their supplies and ship them to them to the troops. The north had also had more railroads which allowed them to be able to transport more troops, food, water, and supplies so they can keep the war in their favor.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction Dbq

    • 2023 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The fall of the Confederacy…

    • 2023 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They looked at Caesar, Hannibal, Alexander, Turenne and Frederick the Great as examples of forces that were able to win despite the odds being stacked against them. (Military Leadership of North and South) However, they did not make the necessary sacrifices that it would have taken to win the war and did not have the brilliant leaders that had allowed Caesar and the others to win. The North did not have incredible military leaders either, but they were still more competent and experienced. One of the generals, Sherman, was positive that they had an advantage over the South with regard to who had the better leaders.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Civil War began at Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina on April 12, 1861, due to rising tensions between the Union [Northern states] and the Confederacy [Southern states]. There were many disagreements on how the Union carried out their laws and taxes. The Confederates wanted to secede from the Union because they felt like they would be better off without control from the Union. One of the main issues were the opinions on slavery. The North wanted to begin expanding westward and not allow slavery to expand with it.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The victory for the Union caused the Southern states to divide and have control of the Mississippi River. Abraham Lincoln, the president at that time stated, "Vicksburg is the key, the war can never be brought to a close until that key is in our pocket." The Union used this siege and victory to ultimately win the American Civil War. Having control of the Mississippi River made the South suffer because firstly they were now separated and secondly because they were cut off from using the Mississippi River. This important waterway helped them transport goods which meant that the outcome of this siege had a negative impact on an economic level which benefitted the North.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Money Wins Wars, Not Guns A war is an unpredictable roll of the dice of death. Most of the time, it is the side that uses the most effective battle strategy and who can kill the most people who win the war, but there are a few exceptions. One of these examples in history is the American Civil War. In the early 1860s, tensions across the nation rose to a breaking point, turning brother against brother in a revolutionized fighting sequence that lasted for years and left families slaughtered on both sides.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays