The American Dream Is Dead Analysis

Decent Essays
I believe that the American Dream is dead, because it really does not apply to the innerworkings of our society. Altough just because the dream covers numerous key thoughts opposed to our current society, it does not mean it cannot all apply to one idea hence the word dream. From Dictionary.com: the ideals of freedom, equality, and opportunity traditionally held to be available to every American. Furthermore, I believe there is only one central set of beliefs within this dream. Our society has warped what they think is successfull and what is American but it does not apply to the dream listed above, which was defined and originated in the 1930's. If it discounts others dreams then they are not following what the American Dream was or was intended

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine himself has no doubt as to the regards of whether the American movement for independence is necessary. He makes this clear through statements such as “the sun never shined on a cause of greater worth” (Paine 37). However, even amongst those who ultimately agreed with the American cause, they did not share the same certainty as Paine, especially not in early 1776. From pacifist religious groups who may have believed in the cause itself but refused to fight (Foner 226) to the wealthy who feared the revolution and its ideals may go too far (Foner 226), the opinions regarding independence are far greyer and more blurred than one may be able to decipher from Thomas Paine’s very certain Common…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In summary, Zinn claims that this freedom that Americans envision they have does not exist. Americans view the choices they are able to make as part of their freedom, for example, their ability to choose and place their input in politics. When Zinn discusses how Americans freedom is actually limited, he says, “And so we have the Democratic and Republican parties (chose a or b), but no others are really tolerated or encouraged or financed” (Zinn, 1). Zinn explains how the freedom is similar to a multiple choice test where answers a-d are options but e, f, and g are not even listed on the paper. What he is not mentioning is that there are limitations within everything.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negatives Of Pragmatism

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Pragmatism in Politics, Warwick Chipman (1911, pg. 189) argues that because the doctrine of pragmatism does not acknowledge whether ideas will work today, in the long run or before “practical demonstration”, the two concepts are incompatible. Chipman continues that pragmatism gives “the handle, but not the tool” (1911, pg. 190). Here he is implying that pragmatism seems good in theory, but when actually applied to real world political decisions, it falls flat.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideology Hartz believed that Americans could not and would not understand other cultures /societies because Americans were in tolerate. “Not having had a federal stage, Americans also did not witness the revolutionary stages…that…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Greed Analysis

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, I feel like there are points in his arguments that he puts his blinders on and doesn’t get the full story or leaves some things out. Even at the times we are the “most American”, we could still be extremely separated. I don’t think the IvI gap can be closed officially, and therefore, I find it a bit worthless for us Americans to try to close it. The gap is there because one side is wanting a more individual dominant arena while the other, a more central power governing. As I do notice, however, that the times where citizens try and revert the government back to a more Creedal like system, things are generally better in the United States.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his pamphlet Paine points out wrong doings of King George III that persuade Americans that the king does not care about the colonies well being, and that the English monarchy will only act in self interest. This rebuts any other arguments that attempt to show that the English will protect the colonies. When the argument of the advantages of monarchy come about, Paine tells that even though the simplicity of monarchy can be seen as an advantage the English constitution is far too complex. Again, he rebuts arguments to do with the king such as: the king is checked on by others. Paine shows that there is a fault in this argument by stating if the king must be monitored than he cannot be trusted, and that if he is being monitored by the people, than the people are better fit for the crown than the king is.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The colonists uprising was not done with the intentions of wholly reforming their social or political systems. Verily, the radicals perpetuating the idea of independence or the later ratification or the constitution were unsure of their ultimate goal and most “respected authorities” believed a republican government could not be successfully established (Ellis). However, they simply desired relief from Parliamentary Taxation without representation. The American Revolution was not a revolution because it lacked components essential to the root of the word: immediacy, wholeness, and in many aspects, large degrees of change. The misconception that a war defines a revolution is refuted not only by definition, but by the philosophies…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Dream Dead, Alive, or on Hold by Brandon King demonstrates exactly what not do in an article that's supposed to be fact based and based on if a dream is dead or still alive. In the article Brandon kings biggest argument is that the American Dream isn't dead, however that its metamorphosing into being about financial stability rather than being able to own everything one desires. The argument he delivers isn't successful in what he's trying to portray because he uses pathos, used to evoke emotion, and logos, used to persuade an audience. Additionally two rhetorical device he uses is pathos which is used to manipulate his audience into believing what he says is correct based on their emotions, and logos to persuade based…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States Oligarchy

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Another potential weakness is that what the Gilens-Page study argues, that the U.S. is an oligarchy, is very far from a new one. The argument was first made through scholarly literature in the 1930s. “If this be democracy, we need not quarrel about names. But whatever the label, the fact remains that for most practical purposes; we are ruled by a few powerful and selfish groups” (Mallet-Prevost 1933, 171). Lastly, the study cannot distinguish which elites, or what organized interests is more effective or influence can achieving its policy aims in contrast to low commoners support.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Illiteracy compromises the fundamental American rights, especially that of freedom of speech. As Americans, we are allowed to utilize our acquired knowledge to establish viewpoints of our very own, but not having the ability to comprehend what seems to be a jumbled combination of letters strips you of that right. It binds you to a perspective that is not even yours. Under the influence of illiteracy, one can no longer communicate his or her thoughts and feelings. The concept of democracy does not apply to them.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays