The case of Ameen Jogee has been an intriguing area of debate for young people and the criminal justice system. This assignment will critically evaluate the significant factors that led to substantial alterations within the youth justice system. Likewise the events that led to the tragic death of Paul Fyfe will be examined in hope of identifying the reasons for the conviction. The actions have raised reasons for concern in relation to joint enterprise law and the differentiation between foresight and intent. The implications of this case have been remarkable with particular reference to young people and crime. The complexity of joint enterprise is evolved around the degree of foresight to inflict serious crime and the intent to cause harm.
…show more content…
The case of Ameen Jogee was arguably the decisive moment that altered the complexion of joint enterprise law in the United Kingdom. However this legislation was originated from common law and has since witnessed cases prior to the Ameen Jogee case that steadily helped to adjust the interpretation of joint enterprise. Surprisingly the law dates back to approximately three-hundred years ago with the initial objective to prevent aristocrats from engaging in conflict. It was often utilised to charge doctors though the assumption in recent history suggests it is a prosecution tool against gangs in urban areas predominantly coming from underprivileged backgrounds (Casey, 2015b). Derek Bentley received the death penalty for his involvement in the murder of PC Sidney Miles during an attempted burglary at a warehouse in Croydon. Christopher Craig then aged 16, together with Derek Bentley aged 19, were detected climbing suspiciously on to the warehouse site. Eventually when the police force arrived both youths were in possession of dangerous weapons which contained within a knife, knuckle-duster and a revolver. Derek Bentley then instructed the phrase “Let him have it, Chris" which resulted in the slight injury of Sergeant Frederick Fairfax (Reviews, 2007) . Whilst Bentley expressed safety concerns, Christopher Craig sustained his attack consequently firing the fatal shot which led to the murder of PC Sidney Miles. In terms of young people and criminal behaviour, it is vital to consider many youths may in all likelihood have some degree of knowledge but perhaps not to intend to inflict serious harm. In actual fact, Derek Bentley did not practically participate in the murder despite instructing “Let him have it, Chris". This interpretation is still disputed within British legal
The case of Ameen Jogee was arguably the decisive moment that altered the complexion of joint enterprise law in the United Kingdom. However this legislation was originated from common law and has since witnessed cases prior to the Ameen Jogee case that steadily helped to adjust the interpretation of joint enterprise. Surprisingly the law dates back to approximately three-hundred years ago with the initial objective to prevent aristocrats from engaging in conflict. It was often utilised to charge doctors though the assumption in recent history suggests it is a prosecution tool against gangs in urban areas predominantly coming from underprivileged backgrounds (Casey, 2015b). Derek Bentley received the death penalty for his involvement in the murder of PC Sidney Miles during an attempted burglary at a warehouse in Croydon. Christopher Craig then aged 16, together with Derek Bentley aged 19, were detected climbing suspiciously on to the warehouse site. Eventually when the police force arrived both youths were in possession of dangerous weapons which contained within a knife, knuckle-duster and a revolver. Derek Bentley then instructed the phrase “Let him have it, Chris" which resulted in the slight injury of Sergeant Frederick Fairfax (Reviews, 2007) . Whilst Bentley expressed safety concerns, Christopher Craig sustained his attack consequently firing the fatal shot which led to the murder of PC Sidney Miles. In terms of young people and criminal behaviour, it is vital to consider many youths may in all likelihood have some degree of knowledge but perhaps not to intend to inflict serious harm. In actual fact, Derek Bentley did not practically participate in the murder despite instructing “Let him have it, Chris". This interpretation is still disputed within British legal