Julius Caesar Essay: Was Caesar Ambitious?

Improved Essays
Was Caesar Ambitious? Using Mark Anthony’s funeral speech and Caesar’s own words, analyze what kind of king Caesar would have been had he lived. The play relays the tragic death of Julio Caesar. After Caesar defeated Pompey, he returns triumphant to Rome were the lower and middle class are his supporters, while the senate has grown in envy of his popularity. During the festival at Caesar’s return, Anthony offer the crown to Caesar three times and three times he refuses it. His ambitious was that of power and control. Perhaps he refused the crown to show his supporters that he did not care much about being a king. He is already the Emperor and has the Emperor of Rome he had the control of the Army. The Romans have seen that he was the best Roma have had in a long time. However, the senate on the other hand could not take the aristocracy Caesar is giving to himself, and they are afraid that he may want to be crowning king even after he …show more content…
Anthony’s eulogy is not only to put an intrigue in the mind of the people about the assassins but also to convince them of the atrocity committed to a great leader. But when focus on Caesar speech maybe he would have succeeded on being a king with a strong control over the republic of Rome and would have extended his plan of ambition at the expense of the Roman nations for his best interests. It is not certain if Caesar would have become dictator of Rome either, as it was obvious that Cassius, Brutus and Decius each one would form their own army and live in a constant civil war for the reason that each wanted ultimate power over the Senate and the political system itself. Caesar is portrait in the play, as a noble and gentle man when he is conversing with his wife, who is trying to persuade him to stay home for fear that something, will happen to him. Brutus on the contrary shows as a man thirsty for avarice and for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Sacrifice

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare’s usage of central ideas develops a suspenseful theme in the play. In the midst of turmoil between the tribunes and Caesar, Shakespeare made Caesar’s death a “sacrifice” rather than a “butchery”. The first three acts of the play portray the relationship between Caesar and those who conspire against him. Amongst the conspirators, Caesar is seen as a tyrant over the people of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effective Leader In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, many qualities of leadership is portrayed. Throughout the play, men do everything in their power to obtain authority; therefore, choices and ideas begin to go beyond extremities. Effective leadership is represented through various qualities. Having self-direction is a major quality of a leader.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was intending on becoming the yet leader yet this did not take place. It all lead up to the shocking suicide of Brutus all his plans were pointless from the start. Julius Caesar truly was a bad person. Although he had his pros and cons just like every person. The cons outweighed his pros in this situation leading to rumours and his death.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a numerous amount of unforgettable rhetorical speeches throughout time. Brutus and Anthony speak about Caesar’s death in rhetorical monologue in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus’s speech initially persuades the Plebeians, but Anthony’s speech appears more attractive; therefore, causing chaos and ultimately causing Civil War throughout the Roman Empire. Brutus demonstrates credibility, emotion, and persuasion in his rhetorical monologue. Brute did a tremendous job of applying credibility in his rhetorical monologue.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, Julius Caesar, everyone sees Antony as a noble man. He speaks at Caesar’s funeral for the “sake” of Brutus, who the crowd refers to as honorable and sincere. By associating himself with Brutus, Antony gains authority. He skillfully persuades a crowd that loves Brutus, that Caesar wasn't ambitious and that Brutus isn’t honorable. By using verbal irony, an anecdote, and imagery which appeals to the audience's emotions, Antony persuades the crowd that Caesar’s death was not reasonable.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech Marc Antony’s speech at the funeral of Julius Caesar is widely regarded as one of the pivotal moments in Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar”. Antony uses this opportunity to sway the crowd against the conspirators of Caesar’s assassination, and undermine Brutus without directly appearing to do so. Shakespeare uses the rhetorical devices repetition, pathos, irony, and diction to achieve such a momentous effect on both characters of the play, and those actually reading it. The use of pathos in Antony’s speech is used in an assertive manner, while on the outside just looking like a friendly greeting.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Latin word “noble” is defined as “having, showing, or coming from personal qualities that people admire such as honesty, generosity, courage...etc”(Webster 's Dictionary). In the 1800’s the word, “noble” was used in many books, speeches and other works of writing. Over time, the adjective “noble” is being used less and less in literature. Noble is commonly used to describe someone with high morals and great character. In the last lines of the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Mark Antony concludes about Brutus, “This was the noblest Roman of them all” (V.v. 74-81).…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The title alone of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare speaks volumes about the nature of Caesar’s death. Labeling the leader’s fall as a tragedy creates an aura of sadness around the loss, portraying his murder as an unfortunate and brutal occurrence. However, the motives of the conspirators that ended Caesar’s life were not wholly ruthless. Rather, this group of men sought to save Rome from the tyranny and negligence that they believed was being perpetrated by Caesar himself. The fact that their intentions were honest and their violence was limited to the bare minimum suggests that the death of Caesar is better described as a sacrifice than a butchery.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which begs two questions did Caesar have too much ambition? Moreover, what was Caesar so ambitious about? In this essay, I am going to talk about Brutus’ funeral speech and whether it was more effective than Antony’s, what rhetorical appeals did both Brutus and Antony use, and if having too much ambition is a bad thing. In my opinion, Brutus had the better funeral speech he was unequivocal on why he killed Caesar and did not try to make friends with the people that did not accept what he did to help Rome.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Noble

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To be noble, to be a person with exceptional character and high morals, this describes the representation of Antony in the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. Julius Caesar is the leader of Rome who is adored and favored by its citizens. Although he is loved, there are some who feel that his power is gaining too fast and he is increasing in popularity so much so that Caesar may turn Rome into a monarchy. These people begin to feel mistrustful in his power and decide to assassinate Caesar before he makes himself a king. Brutus, once one of Caesar’s most loyal friends is convinced that Caesar must be killed for the sake of Rome.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marc Anthony and Brutus are both famous people within the Roman Empire.these men both have goals in their minds that they wanna achieve. Anthony being a trusted friend of Caesar wants to seek revenge for the death of his friend. Brutus being a conspirator who killed Caesar and also a so called “friend” to Caesar. Both these men have some similarities within their writings. So within this essay will be a compare and contrast of Marc Antony and Brutus funeral speech at Julius Caesar's funeral.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The acclaimed play written by William Shakespeare,The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, should go by another name, The Tragedy of Brutus. Brutus is the main character and hidden protagonist, he is a senate member scarred by Ceaser rising so quickly to kingdom. After being mislead by many friends he decides to assist in the murder of Julius Caesar. The noble Brutus is truly the only protagonist in the play, he should be the center of the play in the stead of the short lived and arrogant Julius Caesar.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays