“A devastating oil spill, 40,000 penguins, and the humans who saved their lives” (Lewis). I know that both of these articles were true and that this really did happen. I also know that the penguins in these articles were not the same kind of penguin and they were not at the same place one was in australia the other was in africa. In the articles “The Amazing Penguin Rescue” and ” Saving Penguins, One Sweater at a Time” they both have similarities and differences such as how people helped the penguins and what the people did to help the penguins.
There are many similarities and differences between the article “Saving Penguins, One Sweater at a Time” and “The Amazing Penguin Rescue”. One similarity is that both of the articles talk about how …show more content…
In the text it said “But amazingly, the sweaters did the trick,warming the penguins and keeping them from preening” (Lewis). This supports my claim because this evidence shows that the people were proud that the sweaters helped the penguins and it shows that they care and that it was basically all about sweaters. On the other hand, in the other article “The Amazing Penguin Rescue” it mentions the weather but doesn't say that that is the main issue, the main issue in this article is the oil spill and how people are helping the penguins. I know this because in the text it said,” These men and women understand that you don’t: that this oil spill is a catastrophe for you and your species. Some of these people have dedicated their lives to helping birds like you, birds imperiled by oil spills and other human made disasters” (Tarshis). This confirms that this is all about the oil spill and how humans helped the penguins in this issue because it shows how bad the oil spill affected the penguins. I can conclude that “Saving Penguins, One Sweater at a Time” and “ The Amazing Penguin Rescue” have many
There are many similarities and differences between the article “Saving Penguins, One Sweater at a Time” and “The Amazing Penguin Rescue”. One similarity is that both of the articles talk about how …show more content…
In the text it said “But amazingly, the sweaters did the trick,warming the penguins and keeping them from preening” (Lewis). This supports my claim because this evidence shows that the people were proud that the sweaters helped the penguins and it shows that they care and that it was basically all about sweaters. On the other hand, in the other article “The Amazing Penguin Rescue” it mentions the weather but doesn't say that that is the main issue, the main issue in this article is the oil spill and how people are helping the penguins. I know this because in the text it said,” These men and women understand that you don’t: that this oil spill is a catastrophe for you and your species. Some of these people have dedicated their lives to helping birds like you, birds imperiled by oil spills and other human made disasters” (Tarshis). This confirms that this is all about the oil spill and how humans helped the penguins in this issue because it shows how bad the oil spill affected the penguins. I can conclude that “Saving Penguins, One Sweater at a Time” and “ The Amazing Penguin Rescue” have many