The Act Of Justice Or Injustice Is Essential And Diverse From Questions Of Utility

1104 Words Nov 26th, 2014 5 Pages
In Chapter 5 of the book Utilitarianism, Mill presented the arguments whether the act of justice or injustice is essential and diverse from questions of utility. In order to arrive with a clear view on this, it is of utmost importance to settle on whether the act of justice is real and existing by itself or an amalgamation of other feelings.
The concept of justice has been endowed with a lot of various applications it is still a question on what concept justice is based. The term justice can be fully understood by merely understanding the word itself. The most primal component of justice is the scheme of its conventionality with the existing law. The thought of penal sanctions go into any kind of wrong acts that deviates according to the written laws. An act is considered to be wrong when a person who acts wrongly should be punished by law or one’s own principles or by the opinion of others.
The rest of the paper will focus on the views of John Stuart Mill and how he address the questions of justice to come from a special and unique tendency of nature or whether it can be linked to the concerns of utility. His arguments and presentation on the definition of what is just and unjust are contained in this work. This article will present the argument of John Stewart Mill on utilitarianism as an opposing idea on justice. Mill offered that justice is a sentiment on morality. Accordingly, it will be noted on this work how justice was defined, how others people think about it,…

Related Documents