The Element Of Water Exposed In Thales's Philosophy

Improved Essays
Thales
Thales was one of the traditional founders of philosophy. He held the belief that the arche of all is water; water is the core element of all the things that are present. He believed in God and in his writings through Aristotle, Thales portray that the reason why he stated water as the basic element of everything is because the nourishment of everything is moist. One ingredient (water) that is present in all foods might be a factor that contributes to this concept. As for the food that is dry, the idea is that every seed is moist. Simple metallurgy had been practised long before Thales presented his hypotheses, so he knew that heat could return metals to a liquid state. Water exhibits sensible changes more obviously than any of the other so-called elements, and can readily be observed in the three states of
…show more content…
He states that these are the root of all things present. But, as for the governing force, he has given the concepts of ‘Love and Strife’. He suggests that there are two divine forces that pervade the universe – Love and Strife. These two forces act as moving powers – with Love bringing about mixtures, and Strife separation. If these weren’t present, nothing could ever come into being or experience destruction. Empedocles accepts that there can be no coming-to-be out of nothing or passing-away into nothing. He preserves the reality of change by holding that what appears to be coming-to-be and passing-away is actually just combination and separation of the elements. According to the Empedoclean "cosmic cycle", Love predominates, it is the positive binding force of the elements so that all things are together in a single, homogeneous, spherical mixture. But then there is Strife too, under the influence of which, the four elements gradually separate. In essence, Empedocles has enunciated the first "conservation

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Euthyphro dilemma is started when two questions were presented about the divine command theorists. In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates asked if something is right because God commands it, or does God command it because it is right? This created a suggestion about the relationship between morality and religion to be uncertain I think. It seems as if Euthyphro accepts both theories even though as it is being augmented by Socrates to explain further depths of his reasoning. The options offered to the divine command theorist are intended to be logically exhaustive.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within these lectures he discussed his research on gases and liquids. This research gave remarkable new insight into the nature of gases. Thus became know as the Atomic Theory. The Atomic Theory states that: “all matter is made up of atoms which are indivisible and indestructible, all atoms of a given element are identical in mass and properties, compounds are formed by a combination of two or more different kinds of atoms, and a chemical reaction is a rearrangement of atoms” (Atomic Theory). Though most of this theory has held true we now know that atoms of the same element can have different masses and that atoms can be destroyed or subdivided in nuclear reactions.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vongai Faith Nyikayaramba PHIL 2033-201 02/13/2017 Professor Irven Plato’s Euthyphro Plato’s Euthyphro is an avid discussion at King Archon’s court between Socrates and Euthyphro about the definition of piety. During their conversation they share their reasons for coming to court. Socrates was being charged for impiety by Meletus while Euthyphro had come to prosecute his father for unintentionally killing Euthyphro’s servant for drunkenly murdering one of Euthyphro’s slaves. Socrates flatters Euthyphro, suggesting that Euthyphro must be a great expert in religious matters if he is willing to prosecute his own father on such a questionable charge.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dominic Argenti Development of Philosophy Prof. Urquidez Philosophy (Reading Assignment 1: Plato’s Euthyphro) Due: Thursday, September 10, 2015 • What does Socrates want from Euthyphro? That is, what does he expect to gain from their conversation? Briefly explain in your own words. (2-3 sentences)…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ claim that “things such as size or warmth or whiteness belong neither to the object we measure ourselves against of touch or to we who are doing the measuring or touching” (154b) is a result of taking Heraclitean and Protagorean ideas to their logical extremes. Moreover, in this conclusion, Socrates combined the Heraclitean theory of flux with Theaetetus’ claim that “Knowledge is Perception” (151e), and the Protagorean Man-Is-The-Measure doctrine. These three theses are combined together to properly capture Socrates’ understanding of perception and to make Theaetetus’ view of knowledge as perception plausible. Socrates alters Theaetetus’ initial suggestion because the claim that knowledge is just perception is a self-defeating statement.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ancient Greeks were one of the first to question the world around them and develop logical answers to their questions. Philosophers such as Thales, Pythagoras, and, Archimedes where all ancient Greeks that created huge developments in science and math. With their developments others were able to add on and create many more complex ideas and inventions. The priests of Delphi are also an example of ancient Greeks that have created new ways of thinking and analyzing data that are used today. Throughout the documentary, “What the Ancients Knew: Greece” all of the people stated above are mentioned and have intrigued me with their insights of the world around them.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Strategies of Plato vs. Aristophanes In Aristophanes’ “Clouds” and Plato’s “Apology” Socrates is satirically attacked and rationally defended respectively. The two argumentative styles of Aristophanes and Plato are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Aristophanes utilizes satire and humorous exaggerations of sophist teachings to denounce Socrates. Alternatively, Plato’s “Apology” uses logic and reason in order to defend himself against the charges brought against him.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The original Euthyphro problem arose in ancient Greece where people, including the ones in the discussion, were Pantheists. The two main characters in the discussion were Euthyphro and Socrates. Socrates is famous for leading discussions by asking questions that were meant to get people to think. All we know about Socrates is through the writings of Plato, who was Socrates' pupil. From reading a translation of the original document it appears that Euthyphro was at the court to prosecute his father who had murdered a murderer.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parmenides of Elea came into being during the time of the Pre-Socratics, however he would argue that he never actually came into being. He would also argue that he never perished from being. As Parmenides would have it, he still exists, and he will always exist, for nothing can be created or destroyed, because change is impossible. It seems illogical to conclude that Parmenides from the Pre-Socratics era exists, when we bear witness to birth and death on a regular occurrence. However, Parmenides does not think we are acting from a sound place of judgement.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Greeks believed that matter was made up of atoms. They thought atoms were very small and that they could not be divided. The Greeks also believed that atoms were completely solid, unable to be destroyed, and with a great variation in shapes and sizes. According to the Greeks, color and taste were made of…

    • 56 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will outline Socrates argument concerning forms which lays a foundation for Cebes’ counterargument. Beginning in line 78d, we find Socrates in the middle of a discussion with Cebes and Simmias concerning the concept of certain “essences.” Socrates begins to distinguish two forms of essences by asking Cebes, “But how about the many things, for example, men, or horses, or cloaks…are they, in direct opposition to the essences, constantly changing in themselves, unlike each other, and, so to speak, never the same?” (78e) Through this, Socrates outlines the details of what can be considered absolute essences or that which can be perceived with the senses.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We the individuals hold God responsible for everything in the world, not only by considering the creatures as the work of God but also see him present in them. The world that we live in is known as the “macrocosm and that enters the soul “the microcosm” through our five senses. In the visible world there are things that generate, things that are generated and still others that govern them. They could either be completely bound or separately linked with or they might be altogether free from matter. Next we learn about the five senses and how they serve the five portals.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The story Iphigenia at Aulis by Euripides starts with the main character Agamemnon having second thoughts about going through with the sacrifice of his daughter Iphigenia to get the winds to move to go to Troy. He decides to write a second letter to send to her telling her to go back home and that her supposed marriage to Achilles would be another time. Before the letter can get to Iphigenia, Agamemnon’s brother Menelaus intercepts the letter and is outraged that his brother would damage Greece and put not only his wife in danger but his soldiers as well. For a while, Agamemnon and his brother go back and forth on this issue until Menelaus agrees with Agamemnon and Agamemnon decides to take on Menelaus view and go through with the sacrifice.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle's Paradigm Shift

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    From the biggest cities to the smallest of molecules, the earth and its dynamics have been widely studied over the span of human history. Bright individuals have made astounding discoveries that has allowed the human race to come closer to finding an answer explaining the forces at work around them. Starting from the early days of the Grecian empire with Aristotle and Plato to the challenging ideals of Newton and Copernicus, science has been completely redefined and continues to grow as a result. Thomas Kuhn described particular scientific events, such as the transition from Aristotelian to Newtonian physics, as a paradigm shift that is realized when questioning the flaws of the then understood subject. The paradigm shift can be viewed…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays