Concerning the position wants the reader to take for this topic, i would say a positve vibe becuase after he defends both parties he states his case on where he stood with the whole situation. Yes the writer gives evidence but not enough that would make me change positions on where i stand about taking in amnerica. The writer makes the redaer care about the subject by giving so many detailed examples. not only does he give you the cons about how texting effects writing but he akso gives you the pros. The writer manipulates the reader’s emotions by trying to make you feel the same way he would feel. I say this because the way the article is written. He gives the pros and cons then he states where he stands on the …show more content…
The article quotes Jacquie Ream, a former teacher and author of K.I.S.S.-- Keep It Short and Simple, a guide for writing more effectively.” In her response that texting has a negative impact on writing she states “others insist that texting should be viewed as beneficial because it provides students with motivation to write, practice in specific writing skills, and an opportunity to gain confidence in their writing.” She says, “In addition, because they are engaging in written communication rather than oral speech, texting teens learn how to convey their message to a reader in as few words as possible.” For her evidence and research methods she presented she gave several examples from Sternberg, Kaplan, and Borck also she quotes his book Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. In Crystals interview he states that people have stereotypes about how text messaging is done and those people don’t even text. I find Cryystal’s interview more convincing because his logic makes sense to