What Is Texas Flag Desecration

Improved Essays
Texas v. Johnson

When the National Anthem comes on everyone stands, takes off their hats, and puts their hand over their heart to honor the United States of America. Citizens do this to respect the nation and all that have died for their freedom. There are laws that say that people in the United States have to respect the flag in many ways, but what if someone breaks those laws to exercise their freedom of speech? What laws are more important, freedom of speech or flag desecration laws? The ruling in the case of Texas v. Johnson was correct because of how the Texas Penal Code was written, the First and Fourteenth Amendments and how the Supreme Court interpreted the law.

On August 22, 1989 the Republican National Convention was in full
…show more content…
The Flag Desecration Law in Texas states does not allow someone to intentionally damage or disrespect the United States flag in the State of Texas. This law in Texas is the same law that is enforced at the national level. Technically, Gregory Lee Johnson did intentionally damage and disrespect the flag of the United States but the main argument from the defense was that the Texas law of Flag Desecration infringed on the rights of Gregory Lee Johnson, who was a United States citizen and his rights were protected under the United States …show more content…
It does not represent

the views of any particular political party, and it does not represent any particular

political philosophy. The flag is not simply another "idea" or "point of view"

competing for recognition in the marketplace of ideas. Millions and millions

of Americans regard it with an almost mystical reverence regardless of what

sort of social, political, or philosophical beliefs they may have. I cannot agree

that the First Amendment invalidates the Act of Congress, and the laws of 48

of the 50 States, which make criminal the public burning of the flag.”

(streetlaw.org)

Some laws in the United States overlap and are really left up to the discretion and interpretation of the court. Flag Desecration is against the law in the United States but every citizen is granted their rights given to them by the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the First Amendment in the Texas v. Johnson case to make sure that Gregory Lee Johnson was granted those rights as a citizen. The ruling in the case of Texas v. Johnson was correct because of how the Texas Penal Code was written, the First and Fourteenth Amendments and how the Supreme Court interpreted the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    By having an example shows that it has happen and they will not make it illegal of the burning of the flag. With sensor wording and phrasing it made it a stern tone quality. By saying that they will not add it to the constitution shows that it was a serious threat to the people who thought that the burning of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though there was a State law in place to protect against unlawful burning of the American flag, the First Amendment protects symbolic speech which is what the Supreme Court deemed Johnson’s act…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court found that Virginia's statute against cross burning is unconstitutional. Similar to the Church, the defendants were expressing their belief. Lastly, in the Texas vs. Johnson case, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag in a act of protest against President Reagan. After being fined $2000, and being sentenced to a year in jail the case went to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that the act of burning a flag was protected expression under the First…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that the recent shooting prompted such a swift action because the shooter had a connection to the Confederate flag. The shooter, Dylan Roof, was discovered to have a website containing his connections to the flag, “Along with racist rants, it showed Roof posing with Confederate symbols, including the battle flag.”. This connection could have caused the removal of the Confederate flag from South Carolina’s State House because people could connect Roof’s action and his personal view of the Confederate flag to be driven by racism. Another reason the shooting prompted such a swift action might be because one out of the nine victims was Senator Clementa Pinckney.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This has become an especially touchy subject with the rise of controversy concerning the confederate flag. The confederate flag has become a sore subject with the rise of racial tension within the nation. California has gone as far as to ban the Confederate flag. The question arises; is banning the Confederate flag constitutional? Flying it could be considered a form of symbolic speech and by banning it in public spaces governments could infringe on first amendment rights.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court’s decision corresponded with the public 's reaction. Since the public found the design to be offensive, the government has agreed to ban the confederate flag as an option to their list of license…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin with, in the article "American Flag Stands For Tolerance" by Ronald J. Allen, the author stated that "In a controversial decision, the supreme court, by the closest possible margin of a 5-to-4 vote, held that a person has a right to express disagreement…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Confederate Flag represents racism because the flag was for the people of the south who believed slavery was not wrong. So by having the flag raised in some states could have people hurting from what the flag represented from the past. The Democrats views on the Confederate Flag have changed throughout the years, but are now increasingly negative towards it. " Democrats' views have shifted from a solid 61% majority viewing the flag as a symbol of Southern pride in 1992 to just 32% holding that view today( Jones, Gallup News). This shows how they are shifted from not thinking the flag was racist too now thinking it is and is not supporting it.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The First Amendment should not defend flag desecration because the flag is venerated. Also burning a flag is an action of behavior not an act of speech. Since most disapprove of flag burning, the government should have a right to ban it (Whitman). While using flag-burning as a way to express anger towards the government, it is very controversial whether it is right or wrong. Some may believe that the First amendment should protect this action, however some believe that the burning the flag should be handled differently and not protected because it is offensive.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These negative views stem from a history of groups using the flag during controversial and inhumane times. The “Dixiecrat” party used the flag to protest against the civil rights movement (Coski 2015). In the 1940’s the UDC (United Daughters of the Confederacy) tried to get involved and protect the flag against desecration and misuse, but ultimately lost the battle and the flag became the symbol of rebellion along with racism (Coski 2015). The KKK didn’t use the flag as its racist symbol until its second rebirth in the 1930’s and 40’s, causing the most damage to the flags reputation (Coski 2015).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederate flag banning’s has happened all over the world taking away other Americans freedom and pride from others. I know that the confederate flag was a nation known flag that was flown back during the civil war. It was a battle flag and had 7 stars for all the confederate states that believed in the sacrifice there men gave for others’ lives and freedom and I also believe that the flag was taken away from others believing that it is meant for racism cause it was frown during the racist times in America with blacks getting more freedom. Yes I can understand why others want it down cause of a racial way but it wasn’t for that reason others flung it for the reason of their southern pride and the glory and remembrance of the confederate soldiers…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, to start our, there are no criminal penalties for certain acts of desecration against the Flag. There used to be contained in Title 18 of the United States Code prior to 1989. Until the Supreme Court decided, in Texas v. Johnson; June 21, 1989, that the statute was unconstitutional. Now all penalties are for up for the State’s decision. The statute was amended when the Flag Protection Act of 1989, October 28, 1989, imposed a fine and/or up to one year in prison for knowingly mutilating, physically defiling, defacing, or trampling upon any flag of the United States.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eichman, it can also be seen that judicial restraint is applied. Judicial restraint can be seen in the Eichman case because the Court respected the precedent decision of Texas v. Johnson, a case ruled about a year prior. In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that desecrating the American flag is protected under First Amendment rights. The Court stated that it is not acceptable for the law to criminalize an action just because it is “offensive or disagreeable” in nature. In United States v. Eichman, the Supreme Court simply upheld this ruling, with just a few more provisions.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (page 16 the paraphrase of Justin Holmes) They see that the Gregory L. Johnson actions was not illegal by his own intentions, but by his own rights. As he burned the flag, which resulted people were seriously offended by it, he still didn’t change the everybody opinion about it but strengthen the flag’s cherished place in the community.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Based on “What of this Goldfish Would you Wish”, “The American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, and my own experience, our relationships with others define who we are by showing what we are passionate about. In “What of this Goldfish Would you Wish?” By. Etgar Keret Yoni, a young man is intrigued in making a documentary so he can knock on doors and ask people what they would wish for if they had three wishes from a magical goldfish. Yoni is interested to examine the different answers and to document all of it.…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays