Tennessee Vs Garner Essay

Great Essays
Tennessee v. Garner
In 1985, Tennessee v. Garner changed the way deadly force is used in law enforcement by not allowing use of deadly force on a fleeing felon who’s considered to be nonviolent (Carmen & Hemmens, 2010). Prior to this case, deadly force was legally allowed to be used against a fleeing felon. The “fleeing-felon rule” was applicable because felonies at the time could result in death by the court and police agencies were disorganized leading to a lesser chance of capturing the offender later (Carmen & Hemmens, 2010). In this case, Garner committed a felony and fled from law enforcement with a purse and money. In return the officer shot Garner in the back of the head. Garner’s father sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983 because his son’s Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by law enforcement (Carmen & Hemmens, 2010).
Graham v. Connor In 1989, Graham v. Connor helped to clarify how the use of excessive force is identified and holds it to a reasonable standard (Smith et al, 2007). The Supreme Court concluded that excessive force was based on totality circumstances, shocks the conscience of the public, and what a reasonable officer would do in a
…show more content…
This continuum is to help measure how to respond to variety of situations. The level of control is 1+1 meaning the officers is to be one level above the subject’s level in a reasonable manner. Force is a dynamic event needing it to be adjusted accordingly up and down the continuum. Based on the totality of circumstances, the continuum shows situations of the subject action and to respond as the officer in order to deescalate the situation. The higher up the continuum towards escalation, the more risk of injury potential. The continuum is a way for citizens to claim officer responses as justified or reasonable (Jefferis et al.,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The identification of several significant facts in the case of Tennessee v. Garner calls into question the use of deadly force in the “unattempted” apprehension of an unarmed suspect. The first such fact is the admission and later verification by Hymon that Garner was unarmed. A second fact is that the suspect was fleeing in the opposite direction (away) from Officer Hymon and in a position as not to cause the officer to be in fear for his life. Additionally, Officer Hymon with the aid of his flashlight was able to observe that the suspect was a minor and of slender statue (observing his hands and face) posing no threat to him or others.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system often is examined using political, organizational, or sociological approaches [or lenses] (Pollock, 2010). Asking [simply] whether something is legal [or illegal]…is not necessarily the same question as asking whether something is right [or wrong] (Pollock, 2010). The term “ethics” or “ethical” refers to something “being in accordance with the accepted principles of right and wrong that govern the conduct of a profession.” In the case of police officers, use of discretion, or a lack thereof, in the application of force has direct ethical consequences to which the objectivity of the police officer on scene is subjugated by the subjectivity of a review board after the fact. Actors at every stage in the justice process…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The responding officers had objective reasonableness to use excessive force due to strong suspicion that something has happened in the convenience store based on Officer O’Connor’s witnessing Graham’s speedily act prior entering the convenience store and exiting the convenience store. In addition, Officer O’Connor saw Graham get out of the car, and ran around two times before sitting down on a curb. According to Graham, he claimed, and suffered a broken foot, cuts on his wrists, a bruised forehead, and an injured shoulder and a loud ringing in his right ear that still continues till this day. The court articulated graham’s injuries alone constitutes that his 14th amendment right was violated and physical force by Officer O’Connor was not overplayed.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the first response paper that was assigned, I wrote on the County of Los Angeles v. Mendez case, where the use of excessive force is argued in an instance that left the victims with a crippling injury on top of many bullet wounds. Mendez sued because the officers in question shot sans warrant and against the Mendez couple’s fourth Amendment rights. Thus, the policy issue reached the Supreme Court to rectify relevancy for excessive force in this particular case that could put more favor to the police or the victims. This was an especially sought over topic as it was happening at the peak of police brutality covered by/in the media and many eagerly awaited to see an outcome that could reflect and change modern America. The Supreme Court’s stance in this case is impactful because if the police deputies win, then the policy will “promote police officer safety and help preserve the integrity of the qualified immunity doctrine by keeping standards of behavior clear,” and if the victims win, it will, “preserve the balance of protections for police officers and citizens and provide better incentives for officer reasonableness during every stage of an investigation” (Hopkins and Temchenko 2017).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The detective decided to approach the men for questioning, and given the nature of the behavior, the officer decided to perform a quick search of the men before questioning in fear that they may be carrying dangerous weapons to conduct the criminal activity to include robbery. A “Stop and Frisk” was performed of the petitioner which produced a concealed weapon and the petitioner was charged with carrying a concealed weapon. Issues:…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    of the young hippie movement, a growing number of young people who rejected authority and embraced the drug culture (History.com, 2010). In response to police using physical force in a civil protest, the courts Fourth Amendment doctrine regulating police violence, including its recent decision in Scott v. Harris, is unprincipled and indeterminate. The common law of justification defenses, by contrast, gives a well-established legal structure for figuring out when a person may justly use force against another. I believe that police use of force can be constitutionally justified only if they are in pursuit of legitimate states interests. In particular, police use of force is justified only if they assist the mechanisms of criminal justice (e.g.,…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this research paper, I will be discussing why it is that police officers are reacting with deadly force instead of using an alternative method. I am by no means disregarding the fact that there are many racist police officers, unjustified shootings and racial profiling happening on a daily basis. What I am trying to prove through history and statistical facts is that there are reasoning’s behind some police officer’s reactions and use of deadly force. Throughout history the idea of racial profiling in policing has never vanished.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rightful policing The article is an analysis of what has been termed as the racial profiling and arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr., as he tried to get into his house by Sergeant James Crowley (Neyroud, & Meares, 2015). The article tries to reconcile the two different point of view held on this one incident one being that the sergeant conducted himself lawfully and the other being that Henry Louis Gates, Jr. was treated unfairly and was a victim of racial profiling. The authors point out that the definition of what racial profiling is typically focuses on how legal the police actions in issue are which legality is a measure of the restrictions placed on when the police decide to initiate contact with people as opposed to how the contact is made (Neyroud, & Meares, 2015).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Deadly Force

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Use of Deadly Force Police officers, or any type of law enforcement are here to protect us from any harm. Discretion is something that law enforcement uses and plays a major role in policing. Many people have their own opinion on whether police officers are doing their job the right way. Of course we all have our own views and what the “right way” is and how it differs from people to people. What I believe is that many police officers are not doing their job right due to the fact that there have been many cases in which it is demonstrated that police officers have taken advantage of their position and have used discretion in an inappropriate manner.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Officer Hymon used his discretion in a way maybe he thought would have been beneficial to other. Officer Hymon could have suspected that Garner posed as a serious threat to the community if he escaped. If a person is brave enough to break into someone's house then it’s possible they could carjack…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There is an underlying code of conduct between the public and the law enforcement. Police officers are to serve the country by protecting its people and the people are should respect the law enforcers. There needs to be trust in that relationship for it to be a successful one. Since the conception of the law enforcement system, there has been a distrust among the the people, especially minorities, towards officers. The police have authority to use their discretion in their use of force to preserve the peace in the land.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People Vs. Goetz's Trail

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Number 2: In the early afternoon of December 22, 1984, four juvenile African-American men boarded the New York City subway, in which Bernhard Goetz shot and seriously wounded all four teenagers, after they allegedly tried to mug him. Nine days after the incident, Goetz eventually surrendered to law enforcement. In the process of People vs. Goetz’s trail, he was charged with attempted murder, assault, reckless endangerment, and several firearms offenses, however, a jury found him not guilty of all charges except for one count of carrying an unlicensed firearm, for which he served eight months of a one-year sentence. The incident sparked a nationwide debate on race and crime in major cities and the legal limits of self-defense, incidence…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The situation of police officer Jones shooting has raised disturbing questions about his situational judgment with the investigative process, the total use of force, in additional the searching of the suspect. The questions arise when if ever, police officers are justified in using deadly force in an investigated stop. Officers Jones use of unjustified deadly/lethal force may simply symbolize unjustifiable violence. How does the constitution requirement apply to when a police officer is or isn’t justified in the application of deadly/lethal force? When a police officer use of deadly/lethal force is justified or when is it just a felonious assault?…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stop and Frisk have been in practice in policing for many years now. However, the policy was enacted or better said put into full effect during the Bloomberg era in the New York City area. This policy of stop and frisk was created to decrease crimes by getting guns and contrabands off the streets. But before a police officer proceeds to stop a civilian to stop and frisk them, they must have “reasonable suspicion” meaning that based on their training and experience they should be able to determine if a person is involved in criminal activity. Once the person is stopped, the police will conduct several questions to determine his/her identity and their activities also said as their whereabouts.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Department of Justice, June 2002. Print. In the 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision on the case of Tennessee v. Garner, (471 U.S. 1). The restrictions on the use of deadly force by police were for the first time established as a precedent of law. The ruling was that there should be use of deadly force not unless it is indispensable to avert the escape and the police officer on duty is inclined to believing that the suspect is a potential threat and may cause serious physical injury to other innocent persons or the officer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays