However, as Dickinson characterizes lightening to equate truth to a destructive force of nature, it also allows the reader to understand the parallel of destruction between the comparison of the two uncanny subject matters. This analogy Dickinson has created creates ambiguous meaning in her poem because it supports contradictory arguments. On the one hand, if the truth is presented gradually, it can be controlled and will no longer terrify man, but, on the other hand, lightning can never be controlled and man will always fear its destructive nature. Dickinson, it seems, is too deliberate to use imagery , and is likely attempting to explain truth through the numerous interpretations of lightning. Although her use of imagery is prominent, her use of diction is also a powerful tool the Dickinson so vigorously used. Her poems often contained both formal and informal usage of
However, as Dickinson characterizes lightening to equate truth to a destructive force of nature, it also allows the reader to understand the parallel of destruction between the comparison of the two uncanny subject matters. This analogy Dickinson has created creates ambiguous meaning in her poem because it supports contradictory arguments. On the one hand, if the truth is presented gradually, it can be controlled and will no longer terrify man, but, on the other hand, lightning can never be controlled and man will always fear its destructive nature. Dickinson, it seems, is too deliberate to use imagery , and is likely attempting to explain truth through the numerous interpretations of lightning. Although her use of imagery is prominent, her use of diction is also a powerful tool the Dickinson so vigorously used. Her poems often contained both formal and informal usage of