Television Evidence of cultural shifting is apparent from changes in the portrayal of LGBT people on television. Television does not just reflect a cultural shift, but it is also utilized to shift the culture on LGBT issues. With the consideration that the average American spends approximately forty-one hours watching television, the representation of LGBT people on television potentially has a significant cultural impact. Vice president Joe Biden stated that he thinks Will and Grace did more to educate the American public about LGBT people than almost anything (Sobel, 2015). Go Fish, a 1994 Indie film about a group of lesbians, demonstrated that independent gay and lesbian films could be highly profitable (Gamson, 2002). Philadelphia and
…show more content…
An absence of interpersonal resources, validation, or support for LGBT adolescents leads them to rely on media. Research suggests that mainstream media shows LGBT sexualities in a “sanitized” way that removes sexual components of LGBT identities. While evidence suggests that media audiences are exposed to heterosexual sex in television and film, depictions of LGBT are still somewhat novel in mainstream media (Bond, 2015).
If LGBT individuals are not portrayed in the media, then heavy media consumers may think that LGB individuals do not serve any purpose in society or even that they do not exist. While the depiction of LGBT individuals has been absent from mainstream media in the past, significant progress has been made in the depiction of LGBT in mainstream media. However, recent content analysis of mainstream media revealed that while the depictions of LGBT individuals are on the rise, the LGBT characters are LGBT only by proclamation, depriving them of any real sexual expression through talk or behavior that would be more indicative of sexuality than the proclamation of being gay. For instance, a gay character may appear on Melrose Place, but the character will not have either a sex life or any ties to a gay and lesbian community (Gamson, 2002). Bond (2015) affirms …show more content…
LGBT sexualities are extremely overrepresented making up 84% of GLO media while heterosexual sexualities make up 16% of GLO media. The eighty-four percent represents the estimated ten percent of the population that identify as LGBT, therefore the overrepresentation is not surprising. What is interesting is the difference between the way that GLO media and the way that mainstream media portray LGBT individuals. LGBT sexualities comprise 7% of sexual instances in mainstream media. When Bond (2015) coded LGBT talk for mainstream media, insults and jokes related to LGBT sexualities comprised 18%, coming out talk made up 13%, and LGBT stereotypes totaled 12%. In GLO media, the most frequent coded LGBT talk was coming out talk constituting 29%, and 24% was designated to equality talk, and talk of gay culture composed 19%. LGBT physical flirting and romantic kissing made up 2% of all sexual behavior in Bond’s (2015) analysis of mainstream media, but the behaviors form 60% of all sexual behavior in GLO media. The sexualities of the LGBT community are overrepresented in GLO media but underrepresented in mainstream media. Exposure to GLO media was positively correlated with well-being among LGBT adolescents whereas no relationship was found between mainstream media exposure and well-being. Public opinion about LGBT issues has seen a growth of
An absence of interpersonal resources, validation, or support for LGBT adolescents leads them to rely on media. Research suggests that mainstream media shows LGBT sexualities in a “sanitized” way that removes sexual components of LGBT identities. While evidence suggests that media audiences are exposed to heterosexual sex in television and film, depictions of LGBT are still somewhat novel in mainstream media (Bond, 2015).
If LGBT individuals are not portrayed in the media, then heavy media consumers may think that LGB individuals do not serve any purpose in society or even that they do not exist. While the depiction of LGBT individuals has been absent from mainstream media in the past, significant progress has been made in the depiction of LGBT in mainstream media. However, recent content analysis of mainstream media revealed that while the depictions of LGBT individuals are on the rise, the LGBT characters are LGBT only by proclamation, depriving them of any real sexual expression through talk or behavior that would be more indicative of sexuality than the proclamation of being gay. For instance, a gay character may appear on Melrose Place, but the character will not have either a sex life or any ties to a gay and lesbian community (Gamson, 2002). Bond (2015) affirms …show more content…
LGBT sexualities are extremely overrepresented making up 84% of GLO media while heterosexual sexualities make up 16% of GLO media. The eighty-four percent represents the estimated ten percent of the population that identify as LGBT, therefore the overrepresentation is not surprising. What is interesting is the difference between the way that GLO media and the way that mainstream media portray LGBT individuals. LGBT sexualities comprise 7% of sexual instances in mainstream media. When Bond (2015) coded LGBT talk for mainstream media, insults and jokes related to LGBT sexualities comprised 18%, coming out talk made up 13%, and LGBT stereotypes totaled 12%. In GLO media, the most frequent coded LGBT talk was coming out talk constituting 29%, and 24% was designated to equality talk, and talk of gay culture composed 19%. LGBT physical flirting and romantic kissing made up 2% of all sexual behavior in Bond’s (2015) analysis of mainstream media, but the behaviors form 60% of all sexual behavior in GLO media. The sexualities of the LGBT community are overrepresented in GLO media but underrepresented in mainstream media. Exposure to GLO media was positively correlated with well-being among LGBT adolescents whereas no relationship was found between mainstream media exposure and well-being. Public opinion about LGBT issues has seen a growth of