The employee involved in the incident testified that pedestrians passing by could not have seen the part of the sandwich shop where the search was being conducted from the outside unless they were to stand by the side of the window and look into it carefully, they would have then been able to catch a glimpse of the appellant’s leg. After pulling down the appellant’s pants and underwear, the officers proceeded to try and seize the plastic wrap with the white substance from the appellant’s buttocks. They were unsuccessful in all their attempts and stated that the appellant made it difficult for them because he would clench his muscles as tightly as he could which would prevent them from removing the package from his buttocks. Following the officers’ attempts to remove the package, the appellant accidentally defecated in the area where he was being searched, however, the package remained between his buttocks as it was not
The employee involved in the incident testified that pedestrians passing by could not have seen the part of the sandwich shop where the search was being conducted from the outside unless they were to stand by the side of the window and look into it carefully, they would have then been able to catch a glimpse of the appellant’s leg. After pulling down the appellant’s pants and underwear, the officers proceeded to try and seize the plastic wrap with the white substance from the appellant’s buttocks. They were unsuccessful in all their attempts and stated that the appellant made it difficult for them because he would clench his muscles as tightly as he could which would prevent them from removing the package from his buttocks. Following the officers’ attempts to remove the package, the appellant accidentally defecated in the area where he was being searched, however, the package remained between his buttocks as it was not