Teens Under 16 Should Be Allowed Essay

Improved Essays
First off you will need to know what an adolescent is, it a young adult. To make an autonomous medical choice is to make a medical decision yourself without an adult. I believe they do and they don’t. Adolescents under 16 should not be able to make autonomous medical choices. Adolescents over 16 should be able to. I say this because when you are 16 you should be able to drive, with this being said you could drive to your doctor’s and make your decision for yourself. Being under 16 you can not drive yourself to the doctor’s, so you would have to get someone to drive you so you would already have someone there (hopefully a legal guardian) they would be able to make the decision for you. You may say I am out of my mind but here is my opinion. …show more content…
Everything around us in this world shapes for who we are going to become later in life. The bad choices will come but that is why we have guardians that also helps us make choices we are not ready for then and when you are under 16 you are not ready for life changing decision. So am I saying your guardian does not have a say in this? of course not. You should listen to what people have to say about medical choices, but also listen to what your heart tells you. You should always have other options. This is when adolescents above 16 should start caring about medical and life choices, at first it will be a huge slap in the face, but then again that is life. Today in this time I do believe that is what these adolescents need, something to scare them at first but then realize this is how life and choices you will make, will be. With this being said I would hope any young adults will not have to deal with life changing medical choices. When making their decision I hope they would have support from whoever makes them feel like they are making the right decision. And always be confident in themselves and not what other people expect them to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    5.07 Case 18

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is why I believe that the age to make your own legal medical decision should be before one turns 18 so that In the case there are no parents or guardians present a child can make their own decision. This hypothetical situation could become real very fast in the case of a plane/ car crash, a murder or any number of different things that could happen to a person’s parents. This could even happen if one does not reside with their parents due to arguments etc. In these situations these people will most likely still need medical treatment if something is not right.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy should state: minors who are fighting any type of cancer should be allowed to choose whether to continue or stop treatment at any point. Minors are under 18 years old, but this does not mean they should undergo pain and suffering to prolong their life, when all they want is a quality life while they are still living. Minors are young, but they are the ones going through the pain, so they should not let anyone else inflict harm on them if they want to put an end to it. Autonomy is the power of the person to make their own decisions. Forcing treatment breaks the ethical principle of autonomy.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Osteosarcoma Case Study

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a thin line between what is allowed to continue based on the opinions of the doctors and parents. This meaning, if a physician provides a treatment plan for an ill child and the parents refuse, the physician is allowed to take the parents to court. In the initial case of the 13 year-old girl battling with Osteosarcoma, both her physician and parents have different treatment options for her life. I believe it is up to her to decide what is best because she is the one who has to live with the choice that is made. Unfortunately, the decision is not black or white.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Jack Armstrong, a 14-year-old who has testicular cancer which has been metastasized to his liver. Jack refused to undergo proposed surgery, even after knowing that he will probably die within six months without it. Jack’s parents are split on this issue, his father supported him and his decision, but his mother was against it. The questions in this case that needs to be answered are, is Jack mature enough to take a decision, regarding his cancer treatment and whether “mature minor” doctrine comes into play in refusing the medical treatment. There is also the question of child negligence by father as petitioned by the child protective services.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A person’s autonomy is a privilege that is earned through the knowledge gained through life experiences. For children, the right to decide is withdrawn because the parent’s are thought to know what is best in the circumstances concerning their children. The ability to understand and comprehend the severity of illness or the consequences of decisions is lacking in adolescents. They are deemed incapable of making informed decisions thus incompetent; therefore, the parents are given the authority to provide or deny consent on behalf of their children. Similarly, elderly who are experiencing deteriorating illnesses may have an altered competence due to being in denial or having fear of the outcome.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parens Patriae Case Study

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper will discuss the issue of blood transfusions on children of Jehovah’s Witness’ during emergency procedures where the child will die without the transfusions, yet the parents refuse to allow the transfusion to occur. I will argue that it is the right of the State to judge if the child should get the transfusion and to overstep the parent’s wishes if need be. I will be using information from articles by the Committee on Bioethics, Mark Sheldon, and Ruth Macklin as evidence. Within these articles, I will be using autonomy in terms of parens patriae, omission of treatment and beneficence to conclude that the State can take temporary custody of children in these specific situations when it is a matter of life or death. First, autonomy…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While some people believe that 18 to 24 year olds should never be tried as adults, I believe that they should. By the time you hit 18, you have lived and learned enough to know what’s right, and what’s wrong. All your life, you’ve grown up learning do’s and the don’ts of pretty much everything. While they may not have been as extensive as they are today, they are still things that we should have carried on with us into our later years of life. Almost everyone looks forward to the day that they turn 18.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I do highly believe that Adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choices but this is a highly argumentative subject. I feel as if my parents shouldn’t have to confirm everything about me, for I am my own person by 15 even though they still look at me as their “baby-girl”. Lets face it by 15 i’m not so much of a baby anymore, i’m not completely grown yet but i’m far enough away from the baby stage and am perfectly capable to make my own decisions by now. Parents have the right to make choices for us as children but I don’t feel it’s necessary by the time we hit the “Adolescent” stage in life because by then we have the right mind and knowledge about things to make our own decisions.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minor Consent And Refusal

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, the physician must also make reasonable effort to obtain consent from the minor’s parents or guardians. In the Van Mol vs. Ashmore case, Van Mol who was…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would be the physician’s duty to enforce these rules. In Minnesota and Louisiana physicians have to get informed consent from the minor’s parents or legal guardian (Guttmacher Institute, 2016). Going against these laws would be going against the moral rules and the standards of care. Justice- Based This ethical theory is based on “the veil of ignorance”.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Teens be charged as adult?. Everyone has their own opinion of this subject. Most people think they should because of the crimes. Some don 't because they 're worried about how their life will be in prison Age groups of teens charged as adult.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassandra Case Summary

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages

    This article is about a 17 years old girl in Connecticut named Cassandra who refused to continue receiving chemotherapy to treat her Hodgkin’s lymphoma. At 17 years old, she still legally minor and her parents or guardians have the legal authority to make healthcare decisions on her behalf. Cassandra mother in this case upheld her daughter decision to refuse treatment. The Connecticut Supreme Court in this case ruled against Cassandra and her mother decision to refuse treatment. The court decided that the chemotherapy treatment be provided to Cassandra against her will.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Children’s Act was about a woman named Fiona Maye who is a court judge working in family law located in London, England. Fiona and her husband Jack are going through rough patch in their marriage. Fiona is informed that there is an emergency case. A Jehovah’s Witness, named Adam Henry who is seventeen-year old currently dying from cancer due to the fact that he is refusing a blood transfusion because of his religious beliefs. The hospital decided to ask the court to go against his wishes, along with his family’s to go ahead with the blood transfusion.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays