To many, being unable to think for ourselves and letting some machinery think for us is witchcraft. These people are not naysayers to technology and its advanced ways, they are people who genuinely believe that we are better off without such wizardry. In Nicholas Carr’s article, he mentions what the sociologist Daniel Bell has referred to as our “intellectual technologies—the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities—we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies,” (Carr). The fear here lies within thinking robotically. We do not get to experience much of life when a majority of it is spent seeking validation and entertainment from technology. If anything, technological resources do not show what we know, just how good we are able to peruse the Internet for information. How can we expect to progress from where we are when it appears that technology knows more than we do and is doing most of the work so we don’t have
To many, being unable to think for ourselves and letting some machinery think for us is witchcraft. These people are not naysayers to technology and its advanced ways, they are people who genuinely believe that we are better off without such wizardry. In Nicholas Carr’s article, he mentions what the sociologist Daniel Bell has referred to as our “intellectual technologies—the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities—we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies,” (Carr). The fear here lies within thinking robotically. We do not get to experience much of life when a majority of it is spent seeking validation and entertainment from technology. If anything, technological resources do not show what we know, just how good we are able to peruse the Internet for information. How can we expect to progress from where we are when it appears that technology knows more than we do and is doing most of the work so we don’t have