Racism is a terrible thing and it stinks that it still is in this country but why have it in a football team name. I think
Racism is a terrible thing and it stinks that it still is in this country but why have it in a football team name. I think
JoJo Henderson Ms. Gay ENGL 1301.22 20 Oct. 2015 Textual Rhetorical Analysis: “Goodell Defends Redskins’ Name” In the last seventy-five years there have been effortless attempts by protesters to rid the Washington football organization of the “Redskins” nickname. In 2013, protesters were assisted by ten U.S. Congress members in the effort to strip the organization of their beloved mascot. These congress members wrote a letter filled with their concerns to Roger Goodell (NFL Commissioner) along with Dan Snyder (Washington Redskins Franchise Owner) and also to every NFL organization in the league.…
Response to Ward Churchill’s Essay There are several reasons why Ward Churchill argues that names of sports teams such as “Braves”, “Indians”, and “Chiefs” are examples of outright racism and as insulting to Native Americans as the “Redskins” mascot. First, in real life, names of Indian Americans (in a combination with native symbols and images) are frequently used in a derogatory manner, depicting native Indians as inhuman, menacing, and grotesque. Using tribal names of Indian Americans helps to condition general public to view Native Americans as savages by associating names of tribes with dehumanizing, offensive, and derogatory practices. Second, although it may be argued that such names are intended to demonstrate respect for Native…
Fans that have been supporting a team name for years would feel different about the change and not support the team’s new name. If a team has had its name for years there is no reason it should be changed. An example of a professional team with controversy of its name today would be the Washington Redskins. People of the Indian American race are arguing that the name Redskins is racist and dishonoring, but from a fans standpoint the team name is honoring the Redskins “The point was that the Redskins owner at the time obviously believed that Lone Star Dietz was a Native American and named the team to honor Native Americans and be motivated by their heritage, Waldron.” Sports teams with a long time history mean more to fans and changing names would take away from that.…
If a school mascot is going to be offensive it wont be aloud.…
These Mascots are showing people false information. There are more than 2,000 Schools, that have an Indian Mascot. The only reason these mascots are still here is because they have schools where there is only small amounts of Indians living in the area. The names can be kept but the mascots and some of the nicknames should be gone.…
Felicia Rollberg November 29th 2015 Conflict Paper Washington Redskin Name Conflict What is in a name? A name can define who we believe we are, it can give us something to fight for, and it can unite people together. For the National Football League’s Washington Redskins they will have to fight for their name if they aim to keep it. It will not be a fight easily won however as the Oneida Indian Nation, and the National Congress of American Indians as well as several tribes across the country are doing all they can to force a name change on the grounds that the name is a racial slur and is highly offensive to the Native American people.…
The APA proves how Indian mascots and names have a negative effect on Native Americans while also noting it is a violation against their civil rights. Grose states the Supreme Court had a chance to resolve the racial issues involving team names and mascots, but they turned down the opportunity for change in 2009 in the Harjo v. Pro-Football, Incorporative case. The case involved Native Americans arguing that the name of the Washington Redskins football…
In the same way, naming the football team after something that has a lot of meaning to the Native Americans may make them feel that the NFL isn’t treating the name with the respect that it should…
This controversial issue has two clear sides. Many people feel that Native American mascots should not be used in sports. To begin with, people believe that using such mascots are racist and stereotypical. Such mascots give off a negative image for Native American children. Having to change the school’s mascot could cost the organization too much money.…
Next, the Cleveland Indians acquired their name in 1915. High schools and colleges across the country took these and other Indian team names in the 1920s and 1930s. At this time, real American Indians could not openly perform ceremonial dances. However, pretend ones (fans) could dance on sidelines, mocking the religious rituals. This is why the Indian is an inappropriate, derogatory mascot that is disrespectful to Native American people.…
Imagine having your identity being mocked and disrespected on TV daily. You probably wouldn’t be too happy. This is a constant injustice that Native Americans have had to deal with since the beginning of sports. Different variations of Native American imagery have been used as mascots for sports teams of all types and of all levels. There are countless high school, college, and professional athletic teams that label themselves as the Indians or have mascots that are known as Indians.…
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. In recent history, society as a whole has moved away from the message of a childhood rhyme; in an age where a politically correct vernacular dominates, mainstream America is incredibly concerned with using non-offensive terms. The use of a word like nigger or chink would be inappropriate by today’s standards, so why would the term redskin still be deemed appropriate in reference to the indigenous population of North America? C. Richard King attempts to answer this question by framing his piece Redskins: Insult and Brand with the NFL’s Washington Redskins team. King’s critical analysis on the etymology of redskins focuses on this high grossing NFL franchise, as he describes that the term’s, “lingering presence undermines…
Many Redskins fans will argue that the name is, in fact, not racist because it is part of their culture too and that Native Americans shouldn’t be offended because it’s just a name, they shouldn’t take it too seriously. In fact, one Redskins fan featured in the video had stated “Do you know any Native Americans? Am I not a Native American? Was I not born in this country?” This perfectly demonstrates how whiteness allows white people to see other races as if we are all on the same playing field and then, when people of color disagree, gives white people the privilege to silence them as well.…
I think it is okay to use native american mascots as long as they are not racist. Three examples of native american sports teams would be the Cherokee Braves, Florida State seminoles, and the Washington Redskins. The Cherokee Braves are a (high school) sports team and the florida state seminoles are a (collegiate) sports team and the Washington redskins are a (NFL) football team. These teams all have to do with native americans. The NCAA is threatening to shut down or stop all sports teams that has anything to do with native americans due to racism.…
The article “Indian Mascots-You’re Out” by Jack Shakley, was published in the Los Angeles Times in August 2011. The author argues the issues of sport teams having Native American names. The author wrote the article due to more and more Native Americans protesting at stadiums. With the article being divided into four sections. It was pretty straight forward.…