He mentions that the tax is not only unjust, but that Britain was taxing them for the wrong reasons. He is under the assumption that England is using the colonist's tax money to simply collect revenue and not for a more practical purpose, like regulating trade. In order to show how England was using the colonist's tax money, Dulany states, “there is a clear and necessary Distinction between an Act imposing a tax for the single purpose of revenue, and those Acts which have been made for the regulation of trade" (2). He does not seem to be too bothered by the tax on trade, as it is beneficial and necessary. It is only taxation with the sole purpose of raising revenue that he vehemently opposes. To show his opposition to the revenue tax, he writes, “A right to impose an internal tax on the colonies, without their consent for the single purpose of revenue, is denied" (2). Dulany showed how unjustly hard working Americans were being taxed by the British in order to make
He mentions that the tax is not only unjust, but that Britain was taxing them for the wrong reasons. He is under the assumption that England is using the colonist's tax money to simply collect revenue and not for a more practical purpose, like regulating trade. In order to show how England was using the colonist's tax money, Dulany states, “there is a clear and necessary Distinction between an Act imposing a tax for the single purpose of revenue, and those Acts which have been made for the regulation of trade" (2). He does not seem to be too bothered by the tax on trade, as it is beneficial and necessary. It is only taxation with the sole purpose of raising revenue that he vehemently opposes. To show his opposition to the revenue tax, he writes, “A right to impose an internal tax on the colonies, without their consent for the single purpose of revenue, is denied" (2). Dulany showed how unjustly hard working Americans were being taxed by the British in order to make