Tattoos are more than just ink on a body, it is a way to learn more about a person and be able to see the conections a person had through each tattoo.
Tattoos have become a part of our everyday society. Societies youth have made tattoos as casual as receiving a haircut or a new style of clothing. Parents and teenagers are in a never ending battle over tattoos and the purposes behind them. Were these tattoos for rebellion or were they for expression? Tattoos and piercings offer a way for teenagers to express what words cannot in times of crises. These teenagers seek to be unique and different from the rest of the world. While teenagers are finding themselves, they often feel lost or confused and tattoos offer these teens a grip on reality. …show more content…
The audience would look at these adolescences as rude or harming themselves instead of lost or unstable. Andes Martin gives the audience a connotation of how some teenagers are lost and misguided. A connotation is, “an idea or feeling that a word invokes in addition to its literal or primary meaning”. Andres Martin (2000) says, “Tattoos, unlike many relationships, can promise permanence and stability. A sense of consistency can be derived from unchanging marks that can be carried along no matter what the physical, temporal, or geographical vicissitudes at hand”. The connotation of this quote is stability. Stability can refer to an object maintaining perfect equilibrium, but in this case it refers to a feeling of reliability. This connotation lets the audience know how the teenagers feel, and gives them a relatable feeling of wanting stability. I feel like Andres Martin persuaded his fellow child psychiatrists very well. His connotations express that adolescences get tattoos for permanence instead of defiance. And use these tattoos for stability in their life that maybe family or location could not
Tattoos have become a part of our everyday society. Societies youth have made tattoos as casual as receiving a haircut or a new style of clothing. Parents and teenagers are in a never ending battle over tattoos and the purposes behind them. Were these tattoos for rebellion or were they for expression? Tattoos and piercings offer a way for teenagers to express what words cannot in times of crises. These teenagers seek to be unique and different from the rest of the world. While teenagers are finding themselves, they often feel lost or confused and tattoos offer these teens a grip on reality. …show more content…
The audience would look at these adolescences as rude or harming themselves instead of lost or unstable. Andes Martin gives the audience a connotation of how some teenagers are lost and misguided. A connotation is, “an idea or feeling that a word invokes in addition to its literal or primary meaning”. Andres Martin (2000) says, “Tattoos, unlike many relationships, can promise permanence and stability. A sense of consistency can be derived from unchanging marks that can be carried along no matter what the physical, temporal, or geographical vicissitudes at hand”. The connotation of this quote is stability. Stability can refer to an object maintaining perfect equilibrium, but in this case it refers to a feeling of reliability. This connotation lets the audience know how the teenagers feel, and gives them a relatable feeling of wanting stability. I feel like Andres Martin persuaded his fellow child psychiatrists very well. His connotations express that adolescences get tattoos for permanence instead of defiance. And use these tattoos for stability in their life that maybe family or location could not