Tariff Of Abominations Case Analysis

Improved Essays
Over many years, beginning in the early 1830’s and onward the United States was not so united. The Tariff act of 1828 or more well known by its nickname “The Tariff of Abominations” was designed to help support the northern industries by an increase of taxes on the British bringing in raw materials to sell. By taxing the British it gave the northern port economy’s an influx of wealth from the taxes. However, the South grew angry that the north was no longer purchasing the southern goods, lowering profits with their once best trade partner. “The opposition to the tariff of 1828 was led by the state of South Carolina and John C. Calhoun, who was now beginning his career as an advocate of states’ rights and a defender of the institution of slavery …show more content…
In the court case ruling of States v Peters, Chief Justice John Marshall stated that “if the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery; and the nation is deprived of the means of enforcing its laws by the instrumentality of its own tribunals.” John Marshall meant if the states within the United States can tell the federal government what to do, what’s the point of having a country if there is no ruling factor.

The current president at the time, Andrew Jackson, supported states’ rights, but completely opposed the theory of nullification. President Andrew Jackson saw the theory of nullification as the doctrine of treason and disunion, he “expressed his determination to use force to implement the tariff of 1832” (Ellis). With feelings of a civil war evident they later adopted a new tariff replacing the last one delaying the inevitable for a ten-year
…show more content…
This issue was found so dire that it was taken to the U.S supreme court, and it was found that it “invalidated the antislavery decision of the Wisconsin court in Ableman v. Booth. Despite the decision of the Supreme Court, South Carolina, a proslavery state, seceded from the Union less than 18 months later, an act that led to the start of the American Civil War in April 1861” (Gale). Secession from a country means to withdraw formally from membership in a federal union, an alliance, or a political organization and that is what the south begins to do. The states cannot accept what the federal government is doing by excising their ability to perform taxation, the south feels wronged by all the tariffs that have been created because it lessens the amount of business they receive because the north is becoming more independent without the southern cotton and crops.

The theory of Nullification is important to the United States history because it shows how the taxation and conflict between the northern and southern states laid the framework for the upcoming US Civil War which greatly impacted our country for many years. Secession in a way is the highest form of nullification, by directly leaving a federal body and country you are therefore nullifying all their laws to which you once had to abide.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Such the national government had the short-term victory, but in the long run, the government did not take the big picture into account. Jackson’s quick and aggressive retaliation is what spilt America for years to come. Although a majority of the government believed that South Carolina should have been disciplined, there were a few outliers, like Clay and Calhoun, who showed that there was also mixed views from the “top.” There was still a minority that was against the hurried decision that Jackson made, which could have been the reason for such confusion. Regardless, if South Carolina threw up the “white flag” by repealing the nullification, the idea of nullification, in general, never died away.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The South seceded the Union because of arguement with the national government power. “Many Southerners favored secession as part of the idea that the states have rights and powers which the federal government cannot legally deny” (Doc 5).The North and South had disagreements between slavery and states rights which leads to political issues. The north and South had political issues because slavery was over because of Abraham Lincoln and they wanted to…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Dbq Essay

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Henry Clay acted maturely in the nullification crisis because he was able to compromise with both sides of the crisis. Henry Calhoun and South Carolina’s complaints were justifiable and their aim was true, yet their method of managing the damage done to them by the tariffs was unprofessional and dangerous. If all states decided to nullify federal laws, the power of federal government would be…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The thought of Lincoln taking their slaves, despite his promise not to, led them to secession. In the years preceding the Civil War both sides were forced to concede points to avoid violence, but in the end, it only delayed the inevitable fighting and made those for and against slavery frustrated and ready to bear arms. As the country’s stakes on land increased in size so too did the stakes of the issue at hand. Gradually, as the year, 1860 approached Americans faced a matter that could not be left alone.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of the nullification came from John Calhoun, who believed that the federal tariffs were unconstitutional, in which made the people follow his belief’s as cotton growers within the South began to hurt financially due to the tariff tax, which reduced the British demand for the raw cotton in the US. When the convention took place within South Carolina and they were able to nullify the 1828 and 1832 Tariffs, Jackson requested from Congress, to past the “Force Bill” which would provide him with the authorization needed to obtain the US Army to make South Carolina become compliant with the federal law. As South Carolina was about to be under attack by the US Army, they were able to back down and accept the compromise presented. They accepted the compromise tariff that was put together by Henry Clay. The Force Bill ended up becoming nullified by the state convention and all of the worry was over, as both sides were satisfied with the…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention: Voicing Diplomatic Frustration The Nullification Crisis and the Hartford Convention both brought up the problems in two different styles of life. The Nullification Crisis involved South Carolina trying to nullify the Tariff of Abominations. The Hartford Convention involved the New England Federalist Party, who met to discuss grievances against the decisions made by the federal government during the war of 1812. These different groups and events were two examples of ways that the common people fought the federal government overstepping their boundaries. Nullification is the action of which a state nullifies or invalidates a federal law because they see it as unconstitutional.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Dbq

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Secession The secession is a process that describes the period in which eleven states in the United States of America left the Union. At the time, the southerners believed in the right to own slaves and utilize them as a source of labor. On the other hand, the northerners identified slavery as inhumane and advocated for its abolition in the country.…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed that the people of a state or several states, acting in a democratically elected convention, had the retained power to veto any act of the federal government which violated the Constitution and explained that in The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, “If it be conceded, as it must be by every one who is the least conversant with our institutions, that the sovereign powers delegated are divided between the General and State Governments, and that the latter hold their portion by the same tenure as the former, it would seem impossible to deny to the States the right of deciding on the infractions of their powers, and the proper remedy to be applied for their correction. The right of judging, in such cases, is an essential attribute of sovereignty, of which the States cannot be divested without losing their sovereignty itself, and being…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    South Carolina was the only state to threaten secession over tariffs. President Jackson’s threat to use force in upholding the supremacy of national laws eliminated any further threats of secession (Stamp pg 156). Economic differences did not escalate into war due disputes over tariffs. Tensions rose due to Southern fears that slavery might be abolished. A New Orleans paper claimed the Southern Minority would have to accept some forms of economic oppression at the hands of the federal government like tariffs and the national bank.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever felt like you weren’t being treated fairly? Like you weren’t treated equally because you don’t live like someone else. You feel frustrated because nothing ever goes your way. You always have to get your way by someone else getting theirs. In 1860 the South seceded from the union.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When South Carolina first held a convention to consider secession, they voted unanimously to leave the Union and by February 1, they had six followers; Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida. These states then formed the Confederate States of America. The secession is very symbolic of the divide that was already present between the North and the South. It showed who was for the Union and who was against it. If the Confederate States of America would have been any weaker they may not have been able to survive on their own.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when the Tariff of 1828 was passed, it raised tariffs on goods in south by as much as 50%, thus gaining the nickname Tariff of abominations. Since it raised taxes on imported goods, it benefited the North by discouraging the South from buying goods that weren’t manufactured in the North. The south felt that this was unfair, with…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays