Tariff Dbq

Improved Essays
During the antebellum era, the multitude of pressing issues of slavery, representation and other controversies were settled by way of compromise. But by 1860, this was no longer feasible because so many disagreements and heat between the North and the South had occurred. Consequently, the hullabaloo led to civil war.

Though manifest destiny was becoming a reality via westward expansion, it triggered the start of disagreements slavery would bring. In 1819 the United States contained eleven free states and eleven slave states which led to a balance in the Senate, and an imbalance in the House that favored the North. Nonetheless, most wished to keep an equal number of each type of state so when Missouri had wanted to join as a slave state
…show more content…
The vice-president, John C. Calhoun, reacted to this tariff by openly saying that states have the right to null a federal law, and challenged taxing imports without a clear objective. The answer to Calhoun came in 1833 when a compromise Tariff was produced that lessoned the Tariff of 1832 over a time span of ten years. South Carolina was the only state to nullify previous tariffs agreed to the new tariff resentfully. Though South Carolina’s small act of rebellion caused an uproar, most (including Henry Clay) thought it unrealistic for a South Carolina to null any law profitably or have thoughts about seceding from the Union. Tensions only worsened from there, and an uneasy feeling was created between the North and the South. (Document …show more content…
The “Lecompton Constitution” used popular sovereignty to decide whether Kansas or Nebraska should be brought into Union with a constitution or with more slaves. The constitution was rejected and Kansas was brought into the Union as a free state in 1858 (Nebraska’s fate would be decided after the war.) With the results of the decisions, brawls between proslavery and antislavery people spread like wildfire across Kansas, thus giving it the nickname, “Bleeding Kansas.” The fighting even spread to the United States Senate! A head-turning speech in which Charles Sumner shot down the opinion of proslavery singled out Andrew Butler for being a Southern Senator. A few days later his nephew beat Sumner with his cane! A drawing was soon made, that accurately depicted the Southerners laughing who thought Sumner deserved the beating. (Document

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    "But the plain truth is that [John C.] Calhoun was entirely correct in his opposition to the tariff. Debates about the actual macro- and micro economic effects of antebellum protection are beside the point. The South, providing the bulk of the Union's exports, sold in an unprotected world market, while all American consumers bought in a highly protected one. And this was to the benefit of one class, no matter how plausibly disguised as a public boon. The question of how important the tariff was in causing the war stems from the Nullification Crisis, which was South Carolina's attempt to nullify a tariff and lasted from 1828 to 1832.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tariff Dbq

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Tariffs often prompted numerous debates over the issue of whether businesses or business workers would be safeguarded when economic policies developed. Several Republican congressmen championed for a higher tariff because they trusted that securing businesses would guarantee a salubrious economy in which laborers could find jobs. Contrastingly, Democratic congressmen advocated for a significantly lower tariff because they put forth that if citizens were unable to afford American products, the economy would subsequently collapse. Resultantly, tariffs gave way to the issue concerning government regulation of big businesses. “To keep the revenues flowing in, the Billion-Dollar Congress also passed the McKinley Tariff Act of 1890, boosting rates…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson immediately offered his thought that “nullification was tantamount to treason and quickly dispatched ships to Charleston harbor and began strengthening federal fortifications there .” With such brute force, he turned around and then shot back at South Carolina harder than they questioned the government’s enforcement of the Tariff. To top it off, Congress supported his decision to dispatch soldiers to enforce the tariff measures by passing the Force Bill. The government was all hands on board to resolve this nullification crisis by silencing South Carolina. Secretly, under the table, Calhoun and Clay “had been working against the tariff drafting treatises railing against it and its effects on the South .”…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our story starts when John C. Calhoun, our vice president, resigns because he does not like the tariff law. The tariff laws propose to encourage the Americans to buy Americans goods. The 1828 tariff was aimed at certain goods coming in from England. The goods were produced in New England. The Consumers in this case were people in the Southeast.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1800 and 1860, the life of the northerners and the southerners differed drastically. The extreme differences lead to such severe tensions that caused the two regions of America to loath one another’s presence. Due to theses tensions ¬¬the north and the south made decisions that satisfied their lives concerning the process of the economic, and political systems. Eventually, as the decisions were being made the closer the nation was leading to the Civil War.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Dbq Essay

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, many of these other states agreed that nullification was unconstitutional and threatening to the union and did not join South Carolina in their opposition to the tariffs as well as the government. According to the American Bar Association Review, “Calhoun loved the Union during the whole of his long lifetime. His doctrine of nullification was meant for its preservation and to serve as a check upon his associates in South Carolina who wished to go the whole length of secession.” Calhoun was not a man who wanted to secede South Carolina from the nation and create a new state. He wanted to keep the union intact while improving its democracy by protesting against unconstitutional government actions.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These two events made it impossible for the North to ignore slavery, when once they could when it was isolated in the South. These two events sparked increased anti-slavery sentiment and more harsh feelings towards the…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Tariffs

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The loudest voice in the Southerners' fight against the tariff has been Vice President John C. Calhoun. Meanwhile, the Northerners' voice was Daniel Webster. In 1832, congress lowered the tax rate. Because of this,South Carolina created the "Nullification act." this law made the tariffs illegal.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people who live in the United States appreciate the Constitution as well as the supreme power of the government to regulate things. Daniel Webster was an influential man when it came to the authority of the federal government. He voiced his response to Vice President John C. Calhoun after the state of South Carolina resisted the Tariff of 1828 because they believed that it would raise the cost of importing manufactured goods that would benefit the Northern States. The state of South Carolina wanted to nullify it. In fact, in its criticisms about the tariff, the state wanted to weaken the government so it would not take any action against slavery (Fortner 299).…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Americans during the early nineteenth century were trying to reach for compromise to solve their political disputes, but by 1860 compromise seemed unattainable. The years between 1820 and 1860 were a time of vast change for the newly free colonies and each citizen had different ideas on what advancements from there would look like. All the disputes revolved around one thing: slavery. The issue proved to be explosive by 1860 when the nation realized the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, which were passed to bring a sense of unity, seemed to be done in vain as they hardly made a dent in the issues at hand. Voters joined political parties and voted for officials based on their attitudes toward slavery, the issue caused sectional divides between the North and South, and different cultural events…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When a compromise Tariff of 1832 only slightly modified the existing taxes, the South Carolina legislature called a state convention and adopted the Ordinance of Nullification, which declared both tariffs null and void for the state of South Carolina. President Jackson…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sectionalism is the division of the Northern and Southern political beliefs in the United States. One of the main differences between the North and the South was their opinions on slavery. The North was completely industrialized; factories were being built and because of the massive immigrant population slaves were not needed, nor benefited the Northern economy. In the South, the economy was made up of an agricultural society. The North prospered as an industrialized economy because of the development and the invention of new transportation such as the railroad system and canals.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, state’s rights, and also the power to control the West. What ultimately caused the Civil War would be the Compromise of 1850. Other main factors that caused the Civil War would be John Brown’s raid, the Second Great Awakening, and also the involvement of women in the Abolitionist movement. The reason as to why the Compromise of 1850 was the main cause of the Civil War would be due to the fact that it increased sectionalism, did not solve the issue of slavery, and also paved the way for the Fugitive Slave Laws of 1850. The reason why these events are the most significant are that they are the most pivotal events to occur during this time, which ultimately paved the way for the first…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The increase of sectionalism was an important act formed by the events following the Mexican-American War by causing states to secede, transportation developments, and eventually leading to the start of America’s bloodiest battle, the Civil War. These events led to how America is viewed by people today and what our state’s rights are and will be. By the end of the Mexican-American War, America had gained rights over California and many southern states. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery between the states was an ongoing complication that began to cause conflicts. The conflicts created led acts established by the people that became an important statement for why the Mexican-American War and the Civil War were started.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays