Tannen's Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
According to my personal experiences and past conversations I’ve come across many moments that make me agree with Tannen and her ideas. One, for example, was when person A told person B “ I am going on a hike” , Person B says “ wow ok thanks for inviting me “. This causes an argument between both people because person A simply said he was going on a hike person B assumes she was not invited because person A used the phrase “I”. Person B thinks that there is a metamessage in the conversation when she simply could’ve just asked to come along. This can create an argument because the two speakers aren't operating on the same level of talk as Tannen points out, one speaker was making more of a statement but also making the invitation for the other

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The movie franchise that began with “The Terminator” in 1984 has had its ups and downs. Being the first film of the series, “The Terminator” did not make a lot of money in total given that it had little hype going into it and it co-starred a relative unknown with some German sounding name that it turns out was Austrian. However, considering it only had a budget of $6.4 million and it made $78 million worldwide according to the Wikipedia page about the franchise, the producers were no doubt happy with the result. “Terminator 2” was the highpoint of the franchise in terms of box office draw and overall awesomeness.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wente's Argument Analysis

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the end, Wente's editorial made for an enlightening read for some discussion and debate but missed her mark here in being able to convince the reader through any persuasive effort she may have had by imploring poor use of authority and enabling an irrational way of thinking. Wente's lack in understanding of what it means being a parent herself made her argument baseless and claims ever-more dubious. Discussions like this calls for a voice to reasoning, a voice in objection, and clarity, and, preferably, a voice of unparalleled firsthand account. Unfortunately for Wente she is not that voice.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tully's Argument Analysis

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before significant change in the Indigenous incarnation system, there needs to be a shift in the jurisdictional control of Indigenous affairs. There are many different Indigenous nation that exist in Canada with “diverse governmental traditions, territories and aspirations” (Hogg 192) James Tully’s argument for renegotiating treaty-federalist relations is a potentially viable solution of a multitude of nations that would remain flexible and accommodating unique governmental traditions. The problem with current relations are that Aboriginal peoples have been treated as though they are a part of the federal-provincial institutional structure and are subject to the laws and jurisdiction of Canadian authority. This is ahistorical and counter to…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can a good God exist in a world filled with natural evil? That is the question that authors Giberson and Collins attempt to find an answer to in their essay, Insert Title Here. In their essay, the authors argue that God is not responsible for natural evil, since evolution by natural selection is fully capable of producing sinister designs in lifeforms if left to its own devices. Therefore, God’s goodness is left unblemished since he is not directly responsible for natural evil. I believe that such an argument is inconsistent.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both Harman and Mackie give arguments that bring into question the existence of moral facts. Both Harman and Mackie approach the subject as moral skeptics. I will be using their arguments to argue against the existence of moral facts. Introduction Are there any moral facts? Are there good reasons to believe in the existence of moral facts?…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Prensky Argument Analysis

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What I think Prensky argument is that teachers are still using methods that have been used for some many years and things have not changed. He is saying that we need to bring in new methods and combined then with the old to make one cohesive method that can work for students in the classroom. Prensky said in the article that his sons 2013 classroom has little change to what is 1953 classroom had looked like. This is saying that school are doing very little to change to the way they teach in classroom. He also kind of hints that teachers are afraid of change and that they don’t know how to use technology…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmondson responds to the opposing viewpoint by agreeing with the opposing perspective in a manner where she introduces the idea that she agrees to in a positive manner to later crush it and reveal the truth behind the opposing viewpoint. For example, on page 260 Edmondson mentions introduces the opposing view point “While it may seem that Walmart’s and Meijer’s of the world bring variety to their host towns, thereby adding to the local culture, these giants truly have the opposite effect” ( Edmondson 260).Through this sample we see how the opposing viewpoint has been introduced in the sense she agrees with the idea, but as she goes on she eventually acts against her opposing viewpoint. Big box stores are so popular according to Edmondson…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over the last few epochs of time, one major element has innovated and expanded to the point where human beings need the assistance of this transcontinental "machine" for even the easiest tasks. This massive element is known as technology, and it has situated itself as an everyday utensil in just a couple of years. One may not even realize how much time we spend each day on technology, whether it is for educational purposes or entertainment reasons. With this stated, a majority of people may agree on the fact that technology has deteriorated the human brain. On the contrary, the rest of the human beings (mainly millennials) oppose and agree that massive technology has been leading to positives regarding any given scenario in a society.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teenagers can be very goofy people. They are known to talk a lot with their friends and hang together in groups. They’re in love with their phones, talking and texting most of their time. Always loud and ignorant, they even start fights in public places. What adult wants be around teenagers who make a mess when they’re eating while playing their loud music?…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stunz's Argument Analysis

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another site of legal violence is within mass incarceration. William Stunz addresses the violence of the system as focusing on the process over the outcome. He focuses on how the law was put into place to create the desired outcomes, rather than looking at the results to create the law. This focus on the process means there is no inquiry to whether material outcomes of the process are actually just and as such it appears that the system does not want to fix the problem, but rather just emphasize an existing problem. This is a systemic violence because the way the way the law is interpreted causes the focus on procedure rather than the outcomes (Gopnik 2012).…

    • 1289 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harman's Argument Analysis

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Harman presents the argument that we never have any evidence for or against any moral claim and that moral “facts” serve no purpose regarding the explanation of making observations unlike scientific facts do. In this essay, I will argue why I believe that Harman’s argument is ultimately successful, successful being that it is convincing of its conclusion. I will accomplish this by first paraphrasing Harman’s premises in an understandable manner. Next, I intend to provide a possible attack that could be used to show how Harman’s argument fails and alter my focus on to why that attack should not succeed as well as delivering a counter-argument to ensure my argument is not one-sided. Finally, I will provide a proper conclusion that summarizes…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays