Taking A Stand In 12 Angry Men

Decent Essays
In 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, taking a stand can come in two main forms as seen in the novel from anger and prejudice to calm and logical reasoning. In the novel juror 8 and juror 3 both take a stand alone with juror 8 at the start and juror 3 at the end, but juror 8 started it all off with his vote of “Not guilty” with his stubbornness refusing to budge until all the evidence has been gone through. Where juror 3 keeps his vote of “Guilty” steady through the novel as his prejudice and belief of all evidence heard was right towards the young boy on trial. But taking a stand is most effective when people are reasonable and not clouded by emotion clouded as seen by juror 8’s stand and influence on the other jurors.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses reasonable doubt that is often portrayed in many real life juries mostly because of facts or opinions and consideration. In the play "Twelve Angry Men", Juror number Eight, is standing…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this he was able to create doubt against all the jurors. It all started when Juror 8 raised his hand and voted “not guilty” and said, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’. It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it” (Rose 12). By having doubt and wanting to look at the case from multiple perspectives, Juror 8 was able to start a conversation and. On the other hand, Juror 3 seemed to be convinced as soon as he walked to the courtroom.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winston Churchill once said, “Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; Courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.” It takes courage to stand up alone and share what you think, knowing that others may reject those ideas, and it takes courage to openly listen to others’ ideas knowing that your ideas might have to change. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, jurors had to share their ideas and listen to others so they could come to a unanimous decision. Courage comes in many forms, the courage to stand alone demonstrated by Juror Eight, the courage to not let prejudice cloud his judgment and the courage to change your mind were both demonstrated by Juror Three. These were just some types of courage in Twelve Angry Men.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juxtaposing, Juror 3 shows courage in the play 12 Angry Men when one by one the other jurors are swayed to vote innocent. He stands by his verdict and strongly defends himself. Even though he was unconsciously judges the defendant based on prior experiences with children, he still stands firm in his decision that the boy…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ and ‘12 Angry Men’, share this idea of a single person standing up for what they believe the right moral decision is. The main distinction between the two, when considering this idea is, in which way the group was influenced; Atticus may have unintentionally fueled the hatred towards Tom Robinson, Juror 8 on the other hand, used both logical and moral arguments in order to get the juror to change their votes, to ‘not guilty. Juror 8 also breaks down all of the evidence they have, and discusses its credibility, this is demonstrated in his discussion about the reliability of the ‘old man’s’ story: ‘*I 'd* like to find out if an old man who drags one foot when he walks, 'cause he had a stroke last year, could get from his bedroom to his front door in 15 seconds.’ While Atticus also impacted upon the citizens of Maycomb, he certainly did not cause a positive reaction, like that of Juror 8. " ... you know the court appointed him to defend this nigger."…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays