Tacitus De Germania Analysis

Improved Essays
Tacitus, a senator who eventually rose to be governor of the Roman province of Asia, wrote several works, including ones on Roman history, in which he criticized the rule of the emperors. He himself had some experience on Rome's frontier with the Germans, as well as access to earlier accounts written by the Romans, some of which is now lost. His De Germania (Concerning Germany) is the fullest early written account of the Germanic people to survive.
According to De Germania, the were many differences between the Romans and the non-Romans. Roman society was more effective over longer periods of time at maintaining political cohesion. Greece during the time of its independence was not very good. There were many conflicts between most of its cities.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Their more lenient rule lead to more trust established between the government and the people, which lead to greater achievements. On the other hand, Athens only lasted from about 500 BC to 300 AD.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Paragraph one intro: Hook: Background: Both the roman and Athenian empires were powerful. They were also stricter in some areas more than others such as their systems of citizenships and the rights and the responsibility that came along with it. Thesis: The Romans had a better system of citizenship than Athens, because of the ability to move up in social class, they allowed more people to become citizens, and they had a better system of government. Paragraph 2 body: Topic sentence: The Romans had a better system of citizenship because they allowed people to move up in social class.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aside from the Serpent and Eagle symbols, there were also the Imago (a Standard displaying the image of the emperor), the Manus (an open hand at the top of the banner), the Vexillum (a rectangular cut cloth of a certain color, sometimes with a number, attached to a pole), and Banners which designated military hierarchy (a red banner, for example, would designate a general). The Vexillum designated the type of unit (legion or cohort) and which legion it was. The Manus of the open hand symbolized the loyalty of the soldiers and the trust they had in their leaders. The Imago reminded the troops of the emperor they fought for and symbolically stood for the will of Rome among them. A Standard would have more than one banner on it except for the…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They had a good climate and land for agriculture, but it was not great for, and that’s when they developed an idea of trading so as to obtain necessities that they did not have. Furthermore, the closeness to the coastline and islands supported their seafaring. More so, the division of the Greeks into small city-states was unique, because they were fiercely independent though they were fighting and bickering, through this, they invigorated ideas and diversity that propelled their intellectual capacity, hence contributing to the Western intellectual. For instance after the Macedonian rule, and the Greece was united, the intellectual flurry slowed, and during the reign of the Romans it practically died (Tkacz,…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Citizenship Rome and Athens which is better system? Rome had a better system of citizenship because they had citizenship for non-Romans, Rome censors and citizenship levels, and Rome order and stability of senate. One reason the Rome system of citizenship was better because Rome had citizenship for non-Romans. The evidence of this is in document A, it says that Rome allowed women, children, and a sons of a freed slave can be a citizen.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Another reason the Roman empire was a better emperor than the Greek empire is because they let many people by citizens. In the Roman Empire all people were considered citizens unless you were a slave or your parents were either not born in certain areas or were not Roman citizens (Document A). The roman empire letting many people be citizens brought in people because you would rather go to a place where you would be a citizen then a place where you wouldn't. Many people joining the Roman empire brought in people with good ideas and people who could make good laws or could even be a good ruler. People would not want to join the greek empire if they were not going to be a citizen which limits the amount of people trying to improve the government…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They may have been the most powerful and well known city-states, but they were polar opposites. One of their major differences was their form of government. History.com states, “While Athens was trying Democracy as a form of government, its rival Sparta had two kings. One king might stay at home, while the other was away fighting battles” (“Sparta”). Athens had a government…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sparta was a military based civilization, while Athens was more focused on the effect of public speaking meaning that Sparta had more focus on military and army purposes. Sparta was a better model of civilization than Athens because the army was much stronger , women had more rights during that time period and the government is more stable.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman senate. The Roman senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The location of Greece helped shape different values for the Greeks. One value that the Greeks had was strength and power. The geography helped shape this because Greece had a lot of water around it which made it easy to become a military power house. They had the capability of going to war and protecting their society. When you think of the great wars in history the names most thought of are from the areas of Sparta and Athens which are both a part of Greece, just different city states.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the third century B.C.E., Roman society and cultures were heavily impacted by the Greeks. One of the other major influences that the Greeks had over Romans was religion. The Romans have experienced Greek influence through Greek cities in southern Italy which resulted in the blend of religious influences. This blend resulted in two separate religions, Roman religion and Greek religion, which also had many similarities, and was referred to as the “Greco-Roman” religion. Early forms of Roman religion were focused primarily on non-human entities, such as animals, plants and inanimate objects, and was believed that these natural objects have souls that exist separately from their materialistic bodies.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World History Impact of Geographical Factors on the Greek and the Roman Empire Geography can be considered as one of the integral parts of the development of the Greek civilization. Notably, the geographical factors had a significant effect on the Greek social, political, and economic growth. One of the principal reasons why the Greece was majorly dominated by tiny states and some other independent towns as opposed to being dominated by one all-powerful king was the geographical status. The existence of mountainous terrain, the numerous offshore islands, as well as the numerous isolated valleys encouraged the residents to form other local power centers instead of relying on a single center of power.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another significant difference is that Greeks would sometimes have a double row of columns, something that Romans never attempted. Structure appears to differ to. One of the oblivious is that the Greeks had the post and lintel structure, however, Greek temples appear to sit on a foundation of no more than three or…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Melanie Shane Professor O’Connor GNHU282-09 September 21, 2017 Unit One Test 1. Discuss how Rome’s geography and its physical location in Italy and in the Mediterranean world was conducive to power and growth. Italy is around 100,000 square miles that extends from the Northern European coast of the Mediterranean Sea, to the south valley of Po. Rome is surrounded by groups of hills that have a view overlooking the Tiber River.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays