# Theoretical Concentration Of KHP Vs Naoh Titration

Great Essays
III. Results
Table 2: KHP Vs. NaOH Titration data

Trial
Initial KHP acid Volume (ml)
End KHP acid volume (ml)
Volume difference (ml)
Volume of NaOH Base Used (ml)
1
7 mL
16 mL
9 mL
10.0 mL
2
16 mL
27.5 mL
11.5 mL
10.0 mL
3
27.5 mL
38.5 mL
11 mL
10.0 mL

Table 3: Titration of HCl with NaOH

Trial
Initial NaOH Volume (ml)
End NaOH base volume (ml)
Volume difference (ml)
Volume of HCl acid Used (ml)
1
4.5 mL
14.5 mL
10 mL
10.0 mL
2
30 mL
41.5 mL
11.5 mL
10.0 mL
3
19 mL
31 mL
12 mL
10.0 mL

Table 4: Standardization of Reagents

Trial
Primary Standard KHP Concentration (M)
Theoretical concentration of NaOH (M)
Standardized NaOH concentration (M)
Theoretical concentration of HCl (M)
Standardized HCl concentration (M)
1
0.1
0.1
The molar mass of KHP was 204.22g.
Molarity x Volume (L) = Moles of KHP
Moles of KHP x Molar Mass of KHP = grams of KHP
0.1 x 0.05 = 0.005 moles of KHP
0.005 x 204.22 = 1.0211 g KHP
Dilution of NaOH and HCl
To find out how to dilute NaOH and HCl the equation M1V1 = M2V2 is used. For both the M1 and V1 were given as 0.1 and 250 mL respectively. The M2 was given as 3. The equations were set up as follows: g HCL = 0.1 x 250 = 3 x V2 → (0.1 x 250)/3 = V2 = 8.3 g HCl g NaOH = 0.1 x 250 = 3 x V2 → (0.1 x 250)/3 = V2 = 8.3 g NaOH
Preparation of Ascorbic Acid Solution
The vitamin C tablet was crushed and 0.5 grams of ascorbic acid was mixed with 50 mL of deionized water to form the Ascorbic Acid Solution
Preparation of NaHCO3 solution
The baking soda was measured to 0.5 grams and was mixed with 50 mL of deionized water to form the Sodium Bicarbonate Solution.
Experimental Concentration of NaOH
M = Molarity or Concentration
Known moles of NaOH divided by known volume is equal to experimental concentration times experimental volume.
Experimental Concentration = 0.3 M
Experimental Concentration of
The amount of components was found and quality control found that the manufacturers details were off. This proves that even professionals need quality control because they can knowingly or accidentally state the contents of a product inaccurately. There were sources of error throughout the experiment including non exact substance transfer, inaccurate magnet placement, and difficulty stopping tests at the proper time which could have led to the results being off. Nonetheless, it proves that error is possible and that it is necessary for quality control to incur.
VI. Research Connection In China, people have been treated for hepatitis with glycyrrhizin acid without really knowing what they are doing. Quality control is used to ensure that a manufacturer produces what they say and ensures that producers do not make false claims. When going over the checklist of items that the producers claimed, no study had examined each.2 After completing the study it was determined that the effectiveness of glycyrrhizin acid is low.2 In addition, the safety of using glycyrrhizin acid to treat hepatitis is unknown and will now require more clinical testing.2

## Related Documents

• Improved Essays

For both trials, we used 25ml of Sprite. In Trial 1, 5.3ml of sodium hydroxide was added to the solution via titration. In Trial 2, 5.2ml of sodium hydroxide was used. To calculate molarity for Trial 1, we used the molarity of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), .101 and multiplied this number by the milliliters of NaOH used, 5.3. Then we used the molar relationship from the equation and divided by 3 moles of NaOH which is related to 1 mole of Acid, because they have a 3:1 relationship respectively.…

• 1370 Words
• 5 Pages
Improved Essays
• Superior Essays

0.25g pectin was wetted with 5ml ethanol and topped to 100mL mark in a with deionized water, thereafter six drops of phenolphthalein was added and the content stirred on a plate stirrer with magnet to fully solubilize pectin.. The solution was titrated against 0.1M NaOH solution till PH 7.5 was attained (when the colour just started to turn pink). The following equation was applied to establish equivalent weight: Equivalent weight (EW)=(weight of pectin sample x 1000)/(volume of alakali (〖cm〗^3 )x Normality of Alkali) The…

• 1863 Words
• 8 Pages
Superior Essays
• Superior Essays

Supernatant was taken for further analysis. 3.7.2.2 Calibration Plot A stock solution of Raloxifene Hydrochloride was prepared in methanol to yield final concentration of 1000µg/mL. A series of standard solutions of concentrations in the range of 100-500µg/mL were obtained by further dilution of the aliquots with methanol. All the solutions were stored at -20oC and were equilibrated to room temperature prior to use. To prepare the standard calibration samples, 50µL of standard solution were added to 100µL of liver homogenate.…

• 777 Words
• 4 Pages
Superior Essays
• Improved Essays

The diameter of the powder cone was measured and angle of repose was calculated using the following equation [12]. tan Ɵ = h/r where, Ɵ= angle of repose, h= height of cone, r= radius of cone base. Bulk density: Take about 100 gm of lansoprazole microparticles into a dry 250 ml cylinder. The cylinder was filled carefully and level of powder was adjusted without compacting and the unsettled apparent volume (Vo) was noted. Bulk density was calculated, in g/ml [13].…

• 1196 Words
• 5 Pages
Improved Essays
• Improved Essays

Then using a spatula, measure out 2.022g ±0.001g of KNO3. Add this into the 500〖cm〗^3beaker. Using the 250〖cm〗^3 ±5〖cm〗^3 graduated cylinder measure out 200〖cm〗^3 of distilled water. Dissolve the contents of the beaker using the stirring rod. Zn(NO3)2 Solution: 0.1M was chosen as the starting concentration for the Zn(NO3)2 solution, the same starting concentration as the copper (II) nitrate solution.…

• 1229 Words
• 5 Pages
Improved Essays
• Great Essays

Isolation of Component Via Extraction Objective: Separation of organic acid from a neutral compound using liquid/liquid extraction. Experimental: Similar to the “Thin Layer Chromatography” experiment, a TLC plate was ran with 2 ml of EtOAc and 8 mL of hexane in the jar. The Rf value was calculated using the formula located in the data for all the TLC plate. The mixed compound that was dotted on the TLC plate had 0.300 g of the impure benzoic acid and 10 mL of dichloromethane. A 50 mL flask was weighed and recorded.…

• 1134 Words
• 5 Pages
Great Essays
• Improved Essays

Lactate dehydrogenase was assayed according to the method of King (1965) [21]. Reagents required: 1. 0.1 M glycine buffer: 7.5 g of glycine and 5.85 mg of sodium chloride were dissolved in one litre of distilled water. 2. Buffered substrate: 2.76 g of lithium lactate was dissolved in 125 ml of glycine buffer containing 75 ml of 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution.…

• 1053 Words
• 5 Pages
Improved Essays
• Great Essays

Initially, the following monomers namely, aniline, anthranilic acid, and crystalline o-phenylenediamine were utilized by 2:2:1 mass ratios. Therefore, 1.82 ml, 20 mmol of pure aniline; 2.74 g, 20 mmol of pure anthranilic acid; 1.08 g, 10 mmol of crystalline o-phenylenediamine were dissolved in 7.5 mL of conc. HCl at room temperature under vigorous magnetic stirrer. Subsequently, 60 mL of potassium dichromate initiator was dissolved in distilled water (K2Cr2O7 8.8 g / 250 mL of distilled water) was gradually added into the reaction solution with continuous stirring at room temperature. The ter-polymerization solution was left for 24 hr at room temperature to complete the polycondensation reaction.…

• 1458 Words
• 6 Pages
Great Essays
• Improved Essays

The catalase activity in gastric tissue was expressed as µmoles H2O2 consumed /mg protein /min. 4.2.3.5.2. Glutathione peroxidase activity Estimation of glutathione peroxidase was made according to the methodology of Flohe and Gunzler, 1984. Took 0.2 ml of EDTA, sodium azide, reduced glutathione and H2O2 in a test tube. Then added 0.4 ml of Sodium Phosphate buffer of pH 7 and 0.2 ml of…

• 801 Words
• 4 Pages
Improved Essays
• Superior Essays

Mass of copper sulfate and tare weight of the beaker – Mass of 100 mL beaker = Mass of copper sulfate 53.84g – 50.89g = 2.95g The mass of the copper sulfate is 2.95g. 3. Mass of starch and tare weight of filter paper – Mass of the filter paper = Mass of starch 3.46g – 0.50g = 2.96g The mass of the starch is 2.96g. 4. Mass of water / Mass of Mixture #6 x 100% = Percent of water 32.68g / 38.59g x 100% = 84.68% The percent of water in the mixture is 84.68%.…

• 2021 Words
• 9 Pages
Superior Essays