Arguably, a significant element to consider is inducing feelings of deep attachment and grandeur, according to Source A. Monuments are intended to serve as a pilgrimage sight. Their intent is to bring believers together. As said in Source A, "We must not forget that in the disenchanted world of the modern secular nation, the monument is not, properly speaking, a sacred site." (Source A). Although the sight of the monument is known as a sacred sight, it is not the ground that is significant, but rather the connection to the past that is induced. This is demonstrated in the Lincoln Memorial. This awe-inspiring monument was erected on …show more content…
In the past, consideration wasn't always taken in where a monument was erected. The act of desecrating sacred grounds, has caused indifference in natives peoples, due to their inability to change the situation. The Indians are apathetic towards the monuments, "As for the loss of the Black Hills, Mr. Iron Cloud told me, without rancor, that there wasn't much to be done about it now" (Source C) Through the use of the Black Hills, the Indians saw it as a desecration. It's the perception of disrespect for tradition and the apathy towards the Indians beliefs, that minimize the awareness the monuments are supposed to inspire. In the instance of Mount Rushmore, many Sioux Indians feel it is a form of graffiti to their sacred