Moral Relativism And Syncretism

Improved Essays
The opinion of what truth is like has been distorted over the years. Then everyone began to develop their own separate view, which snowballed into something called moral relativism. Moral relativism contradicts itself, because nothing is true if everyone thinks something different is true. That is why Catholics believe in moral absolutism, which states that morality relies on universal truths and God is as unchanging as them. These universal principles help guide us to a greater morality and are vital in our striving for the kingdom of God. Moral relativism is bad for a person of faith as can be seen by the ideals of syncretism, the increase of ideological tolerance, and the roots of relativism. Syncretism is the blending of multiple faiths …show more content…
Then they would start to be louder because only then will be right. This is called ideological tolerance, which is just the passive way of saying that a person does not consider anything they think is wrong and arguing endlessly with anyone who dares to think differently. The opposite of ideological tolerance is sociological tolerance, the Catholic view. Sociological tolerance is treating a person with a different view on a topic with respect, despite disagreeing with them. Things around the world would be much better all people tried to use sociological tolerance. The government of the United States of America, for example, would be run better if both sides spent more time compromising their ideas instead of arguing each other’s political stance and trying to get their way. This relates to moral relativism because if people were not so busy trying to reason with their specific beliefs, then they would not have to aggressively defend them against others who are doing the same thing. This makes for a cycle of arguments between people which is bad for the peace in our …show more content…
These are that the Church forces its followers to do things and that everything the Church says is irrelevant. These arguments really speak volumes of their ideological tolerance and sheds light on how they need to attach other opinions in order to feel good about theirs. If they deny the ultimate truth than the moral relativists need to look in the mirror to decide what their own unique idea of truth really is. Father J says it best when disputing the point of relevancy, “But if it is (relevant), do not be afraid to declare that He is yours and you are His.” Father J is saying that if we believe moral relativism is wrong than we need to commit our lives to God and help save others from the lies. If everyone believes the truth is a different thing, then nothing is true for everybody. We as Catholics are accountable for helping extirpate moral relativism from the world, not because we are required by the Church, but because it is our responsibility. Moral relativism is causing problems that can only be fixed by getting rid of it and opening people’s eyes to God and that is just what we will have to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, if we were not believers, this interpretation would allow us to recognize the basic moral principles in our human nature. Thus, I believe that this argument allows a broad recognition of moral principles that moral in human…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, that claim is in and of itself a moral objective claim. Moral relativism runs contrary to the widespread moral intuition that…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the subject of ethical relativism, Ruth Benedict believes that cultural relativism and ethical relativism do not interfere with each other, also moral principles does not derive from cultural acceptance, furthermore, there are universal moral codes based on common aspects. (Vice and Virtue) While I do agree that there a set of moral standards that does not differ much from others, nevertheless,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The crux of Calvin’s “Reply to Sadoleto” focuses on the theological criticisms of Roman Catholicism and the formation of Reformation theology. Calvin argues that the Roman Catholic Church first and foremost silenced the Gospel, which led to the perversion of the four things on which the safety of the church is founded, which are doctrine, discipline, the sacraments, and ceremonies (9). In order to purify these vital elements of the church, the Catholic Church needs to change its perspective on the understanding of true faith, the true church, and the authority of the universal church. Calvin believes that having the right understanding of faith is an integral part of Christian faith and a cornerstone of the church.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the most part, I believe Americans would like to make decisions based on moral absolutism as that seems to be right decision to make, but in all reality, guidance is based on moral relativism due to so many variables that take place today. Ruth Benedict discusses in A Defense of Ethical Relativism what various cultures viewed as a moral absolutism in a particular part of the world but may be seen as moral relativism in another part. Benedict discussed homosexuality as being accepted in the American Indian tribe years ago but one would have never thought it possible when thinking about the era of cowboys and Indians as they portrayed a very masculine image. The Northwest Coast civilization’s known practice was when an individual was killed,…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This assignment helped me understand and achieve the educational goals of the university by helping me realize the ignorance that existed towards anyone who was different. Many use texts to degrade others beliefs and to better their beliefs. This is wrong and in reading these articles I now have a greater knowledge of this and will always try to see both sides of a situation equally. This assignment was important for a better understanding of American religious diversity because it demonstrated the biased that exists and how diversity can lead to issues regarding religion.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose that I am a relativist because I believe that everyone’s moral principle is relative to the person who holds it. Everyone has their own opinion on what is permissible and what is not permissible. Everyone’s moral code can be different than society, for prime example, some people believe that everyone should be treated equally, and some do not. We as individuals cannot say that everyone’s moral value or cultural practice is objectively right or wrong. I am exactly like this, everyone has their own opinion, practices and beliefs, we cannot use our standards to judge another’s morality it is just ethically wrong.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, with an example like this, this is why moral realism makes the most sense. After researching moral realism and moral relativism further they are both standpoints in which I understand and was able to grasp a fundamental understanding of the two. Moral realism is judgments based on factual information and is basically true or false. Moral relativism is basically a claim and…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the view that “some moral rules really are correct, and that these determine which moral claims are true and which false.”…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with ethical relativism because we already have it and if we reject ethical relativism then who will have to power to say what's right and wrong for all societies. If we reject ethical relativism then history will repeat itself with a person who will get the power to implement what's right and wrong without any say from…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION In this document, I will be discussing ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism. In doing so, the first thing that I will discuss is the theocratical claims that both theories are based on. Then after discussing that, the next thing that I will do is to explain the relationship between both theories. Then lastly, I will outline some of the implications of these ethical positions on classroom practices.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays