Here, they decide on the details of their final attempt at robbery, and engage in a sequence almost identical to the end of De Sica’s film. However, Zahed and Gol-Ghotai’s narrative takes a different turn than that of De Sica’s Bruno and Antonio. Zahed acts as the active thief (Antonio) and Gol-Ghotai as his accomplice (Bruno). Aided by Gol-Ghotai’s screaming “thief!”, Zahed is quickly swarmed and apprehended for this theft. Unlike in Bicycle Thieves, however, Zahed is not liberated out of pity and responsibility to his dependent sister, serving as an analogous relationship to that of Antonio and his son Bruno. Instead, Zahed alone is arrested, leaving Gol-Ghotai behind. Despite his desperate attempts to take her with him, she is ignored by the crowd as Zahed gets carried away to prison. Using deliberate allusion, Meshkini has further developed the neglectful, unorganized nature of the society that has abandoned and mistreated our stray
Here, they decide on the details of their final attempt at robbery, and engage in a sequence almost identical to the end of De Sica’s film. However, Zahed and Gol-Ghotai’s narrative takes a different turn than that of De Sica’s Bruno and Antonio. Zahed acts as the active thief (Antonio) and Gol-Ghotai as his accomplice (Bruno). Aided by Gol-Ghotai’s screaming “thief!”, Zahed is quickly swarmed and apprehended for this theft. Unlike in Bicycle Thieves, however, Zahed is not liberated out of pity and responsibility to his dependent sister, serving as an analogous relationship to that of Antonio and his son Bruno. Instead, Zahed alone is arrested, leaving Gol-Ghotai behind. Despite his desperate attempts to take her with him, she is ignored by the crowd as Zahed gets carried away to prison. Using deliberate allusion, Meshkini has further developed the neglectful, unorganized nature of the society that has abandoned and mistreated our stray