In a tactical move by the plaintiff’s attorneys, the “Failure-to-warn” portion of the law suit was eventually dropped. This move in the end proved to be a serious tactical error for the Pelman case. Once again the suit being decided by Judge Robert sweets was dismissed in September 2003 for the remaining claim stating that the plaintiffs had not sufficiently alleged the elements of deceptive advertising. The judge then chastised the attorneys for failure to follow his previous instructions and commentary when resubmitting the amended complaint.
The failure of the Pelman attorneys:
When confronting a product liability claim (4) four key legal hurdles must come into play and must be proven by the plaintiffs to win the suit. (1) the danger was
The failure of the Pelman attorneys:
When confronting a product liability claim (4) four key legal hurdles must come into play and must be proven by the plaintiffs to win the suit. (1) the danger was