Swallowing Stones Character Analysis

Superior Essays
Tears. Regret. Deaths. We’ve all experienced and felt them. Swallowing Stones ( Joyce McDonald ), is a captivating book that creates characters showing that everyone has their own problems and issues throughout everything. From being a murderer, your father suddenly getting shot right before your eyes, your parents perishing when you are young, and even having an extreme alcohol and cigarette issue. Minor characters even have their own issues they must break through. They each have their problems. While, they may not be the main characters with everything revolving around themselves, they each play an extremely significant role. From the best friend, the crush, to the brother. They each show their own personalities through speech, symbolism …show more content…
Joe, the best friend with a alcohol and cigarette problem, oh yea and he is friends with a murderer, he is kind of crazy, but let alone adds heeps of drama into the book. Firstly, in the text you read, “Things you don’t wanna live with ya know?” (Page 13 ) Joe tells Michael this because they just heard on the radio, a shot fired on the fourth of July struck Charlie Ward in the head. Michael felt terrible but Joe insisted him to lie. Which Michael does. Joe tells Michael this because he is trying to convince him that this could ruin him and he shouldn’t want to live with it. If it weren’t for Joe in this current situation the book would have no backstory what so ever. Nevertheless, this isn’t exactly a heroic act Joe did. He only dug a deeper hole for Michael to get out of, which adds more issues and conflict with Michael and himself, debating what to do and such. According to the text joe was found, “ smashing roadside mailboxes drunk” ( Page 13) I said previously Joe has a serious alcohol and cigarette problem, this just supports my statement. Joe did this back in 8th grade which would be underage drinking. This just makes him a terrible role model in general. Also, this present he is a disgusting person, if Joe was never as terrible or if he never existed would he have told Michael to lie? Lastly the text presents this, “ Smash in that stupid b****s windshield”(Page 211 ) Joe says this after a collision with Amy Ruggiero, this displays Joe is just a plain jerk. That is the simplest way to put it! For one he called her a quote on quote stupid b**** and he smashed in her windshield when she could of been dead. Which angers Michael because of how much he cares about Amy. This adds an enormous amount of conflict between Joe and Michael later in the book. It actually seems to ruin their friendship, if Joe never even existed the friend drama wouldn’t ever be there. Overall, Joe is added into Swallowing Stones to add a twist to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He flips out at the gun shop when the manager was offending him which just encourages his trepidation of Americans. After the occasions on 9/11, which is referenced a great deal in the movie, Farhad feels that any individual whom is from the Middle Eastern heritage is not welcome in the United States. Even after the weapon shop proprietor was impolite; his shop was obliterated by bigot individuals who detested him. It is this same fear of being puzzled in view of his race that makes him exceptionally untrusting to individuals he doesn't have a clue. He calls a lock smith to come alter his entryway on the grounds that it won't bolt.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was so bad that he believed his appearance could actually be fatal and kill him.The way zits felt about himself affected a lot of the decisions he made and limited him to what he is actually capable of. By the end of the story he learned that his self appearance wasn 't as important and that just because he felt ugly it didn 't mean he necessarily needed to do ugly things. As for his name, by the end he finally realized the importance of his name and he wanted to be called Michael. He no longer wanted to be called by Zits because that wasn 't who he was. His pimples did not define him and he learned…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The impact of this event is caused profound. During the interview, Laramie town residents for access from the beginning of this conflict, to finally experienced a complex process that is their careful thought and struggling process. Drama had a highway patrol officer 's wife thought Matthew was an alcoholic, that he always provoke others to insult herself, she questioned why this case will be the focus of attention throughout the United States, but recently, a patrol was killed only become spread In the small local news. She reminded everyone that no one is perfect. Matthew friends Matthew is not always like behavior, but also a young man he called "rich little bastard," but a person should not be because he is an alcoholic wealthy little bastard is gay and is murder.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is towards the end of the movie that David Callaway (Robert De Niro) is Charlie, a man suffering from Dissociative Identity Disorder and not Emily (Dakota Fanning) whose mother had just died was a far more likely candidate to develop DID, if not already developed. David developed DID when he caught his wife betraying him and as a result his alter (Charlie) killed her. David was a deeply disturbed man that feared involvement with others and because it he withdraws into himself creating Charlie as his alter personality but was unware the entire time. People with DID lose their sense of reality. Who they are depend on their feelings, thoughts, sensations, perceptions and memories that becomes disconnected from each other or doesn’t register in the conscious mind.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The description of the Clutters conveys the message that they were the good “All American Family”, which argues that the family did not deserve what happened to them. The complex way that the murderers are written almost makes one feel pity for Perry. The book analyzes the life of Perry before the night of the murders. His past is a very complex one that traumatized him. He was beaten when he peed the bed even though he had weak kidneys, his siblings committed suicide, and his remaining sibling wanted nothing to do with him, which all contributes to the argument later in the book that maybe he was insane because of his unfair and brutal childhood.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [Holden] laughed” (Salinger 148-149). This shows Holden’s inability to show empathy because he just made a girl that he said he wanted to marry cry, and then he laughed at her pain. Holden then goes on to explain how he could not keep himself from laughing because of how funny the whole ordeal was. This is an evident example of Holden’s unstable disregard for others. Another example of Holden’s inability to show empathy was when he fantasized about shooting Maurice, a pimp who punched Holden for paying him five dollars short.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The management of Allie’s death by Holden’s parents was fatally flawed and lacking for Holden, which is seen by the broken garage windows etc. This fatal flaw snowballed into Holden’s internal struggles, which is in turn assisting in his downfall. There are plenty of factors in Holden’s downfall, nevertheless we can be almost certain that his downfall is…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Robinson struggled throughout the book due to being discriminated because of his skin color, causing him to lose the trial, and eventually, get himself killed. Mayella Ewell, being a victim of abuse and mistreatment by her father, Bob Ewell, and the community resulted to her wining the trial, even under false circumstances, but also the death of her father. Lastly, Boo Radley was someone many people made assumptions about without actually getting to knowing him, causing him to show his true colors when being able to save Jem and Scout when Bob Ewell attacks. In conclusion, no matter how hard people try, they will all be victims of their own problems, but depending on how vulnerable they are against the situation they are in, it determines the choices they make and the outcome that 'll be displayed in the…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many small and insignificant, like facing guilt or being ashamed, and many very large and real, like the dying soldiers and animals during WWI. Findley encapsulated very well the aftermath WWI left thousands suffering in. A large amount of characters have developed greatly as they had to adapt though the war. Robert, being the main character, must change the most as he faces many challenges along his journey through the difficult times of the war. The prominent effects that the war had on the characters, were the loss of innocence, the huge influence of gender roles, and the insanity that is impossible to…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So George obviously was going to fulfill his promises but Lennie’s string of bad decisions were getting worse and”(the) bastard stole my lugar” Carlson said “ It ain 't in my bag”(97). Even though George promised to keep an eye on him that does not mean he can stop him from killing the next person he does not think about whether it would get him in trouble or not. After Lennie killed Curley’s wife, he stole Carlson 's gun which does not help his case it only set him up to look like he was going to kill another person. Another reason George would of thought about his choice is because he knew of Lennie 's mental capabilities. But George had no way to cover this mistake.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays