Surveillance: A Tale Told By An Idiot It is true people do hate America but the entire world is hated and distrusted by someone. There are times that I myself have found reasons to look at America as nothing more than an enemy that looks to hold me down, but the true question is why do groups that are defined as terrorist organisations hate America as much as a Star Wars fans hates the Prequels. The United States may not be the best nation on earth but by the view of the people that live here and even outsiders have had views of the United States as the promise land it once was, where you can build your dreams from nothing. Still there are people on the outside and inside that have a nova like hatred for the actions the American government
…show more content…
With those vague definitions anyone can be defined as a terrorist and terrorism could be pursued by any being at any moment on a too bad of a day. The ethics of surveillances is now a philosophical question. Thought of philosophy was through Emrys Westacott a philosopher and professor from Alfred University, In Does Surveillance Make…, Westacott wrote about why that has written on law and tolerance with society. This has lead to thought that Surveillance of the people is meant to morally protect the people from danger of any threat by 360 degrees. Do the American people really know if they are being watched by the eagle eye of surveillance or is it more of a panic that secrets will be visible to the public (Westacott, 2010). As an American citizen it is easy to ignore that there are other countries that use mass media and surveillance in order to find information on residence and there are areas outside the states that do not question the increased surveillance. Mass surveillance is like God watching a CCTV (or any other device) and the video is your city coming from your street that may be an area that is alway centered with drivers that run red lights. The writing of Nicholas Owen (2013) also a philosopher but from The Queen 's College, his works focuses on politics and government. Owens journal entry focuses on the …show more content…
At that point people felt as if free will is still available though the camera that is God’s eye can see everything still. As people make what may or may not be the best decision but it 's done because people think our proper view of justice will allow them to choose what is right what is right. The watchful CCTV does not allow you to gain a moral code, just as if God had put up CCTV in Eden, Eve (possible radicals) would have not reach for the fruit and neither of them would have eaten the food. The increase of surveillance countrywide and worldwide is more of a self interest than aurance for the people of that nation. It would be like God simply say he wants obedience from the the world the cameras take away the voluntary aspect but increase by fear because one may be caught watched by any branch of government. With something as philosophy there is a circular feel as if you are going through the same question continuously though Westacott (2010) ended his article by writing, “In some contexts, surveillance helps keep us on track and thereby reinforces good habits that become second nature.” The use of CCTV was simply used as an I idea to use a focus
With those vague definitions anyone can be defined as a terrorist and terrorism could be pursued by any being at any moment on a too bad of a day. The ethics of surveillances is now a philosophical question. Thought of philosophy was through Emrys Westacott a philosopher and professor from Alfred University, In Does Surveillance Make…, Westacott wrote about why that has written on law and tolerance with society. This has lead to thought that Surveillance of the people is meant to morally protect the people from danger of any threat by 360 degrees. Do the American people really know if they are being watched by the eagle eye of surveillance or is it more of a panic that secrets will be visible to the public (Westacott, 2010). As an American citizen it is easy to ignore that there are other countries that use mass media and surveillance in order to find information on residence and there are areas outside the states that do not question the increased surveillance. Mass surveillance is like God watching a CCTV (or any other device) and the video is your city coming from your street that may be an area that is alway centered with drivers that run red lights. The writing of Nicholas Owen (2013) also a philosopher but from The Queen 's College, his works focuses on politics and government. Owens journal entry focuses on the …show more content…
At that point people felt as if free will is still available though the camera that is God’s eye can see everything still. As people make what may or may not be the best decision but it 's done because people think our proper view of justice will allow them to choose what is right what is right. The watchful CCTV does not allow you to gain a moral code, just as if God had put up CCTV in Eden, Eve (possible radicals) would have not reach for the fruit and neither of them would have eaten the food. The increase of surveillance countrywide and worldwide is more of a self interest than aurance for the people of that nation. It would be like God simply say he wants obedience from the the world the cameras take away the voluntary aspect but increase by fear because one may be caught watched by any branch of government. With something as philosophy there is a circular feel as if you are going through the same question continuously though Westacott (2010) ended his article by writing, “In some contexts, surveillance helps keep us on track and thereby reinforces good habits that become second nature.” The use of CCTV was simply used as an I idea to use a focus