Supreme Court Judges

Superior Essays
The Selection of Supreme Court Justices and the Litmus Test
The selection and appointment of US Supreme Court judges are important to the management of cases involving the laws of Congress and the Constitution. Therefore, this process is complex. Under the constitution, presidents have the power to “nominate justices, and, in doing so, they have employed several criteria at different times, including professional merit, ideological compatibility, and political support by the president and his advisers” (Dorsen 2006). The Senate also has the constitutional authority to confirm or reject the president’s nominations (Dye and Gaddie 2014). In the history of the US Supreme Court, there have been 112 appointed justices, and over 30 presidential nominations
…show more content…
When John Roberts was asked if he supported Roe v. Wade, he stated that “the case was now precedent in constitutional law and entitled to due respect.” He also insisted staying away from “issues that may come before the court again” (Dye and Gaddie 2014). While I agree that it is important to know the viewpoints of these judges on specific cases, it is also important to note that these judges, when appointed, may change their opinions with time, as we have seen with justices that deviate from the nominating president’s political philosophy. It is stated that due to this reason, “it is futile to choose nominees and confirm them on the basis of their political views” (Standler …show more content…
Federal judges are held to very high standards, hence they must meet all requirements, including succeeding in the litmus test, although this may not be the sole basis of appointing a Supreme Court justice. Standler, in his work, How to Select a Justice for the U.S. Supreme Court, rated former Supreme Court justices, Byrnes and Whittaker, as “failures.” He further mentioned that “Byrnes had dropped out of school at age 14 y and attended neither college nor law school. Justice Byrnes was, however, a lawyer in South Carolina since 1903.” Additionally, “Whittaker dropped out of high school at age 16 y, never attended college, attended law school at night in Kansas City” (Standler

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.” Theall believes her experience as a judge and lawyer will allow her keep her personal beliefs out of cases and solely make a ruling from the facts presented. “As a judge you learn very quickly that your personal opinions don’t matter,” she said. “Your opinions are solely based off the facts and evidence in front of you.”…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Gorsuch Essay

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    President Trump has nominated conservative federal appeals court judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the Supreme Court seat which has been vacant since the passing of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The nomination announcement came on Tuesday night, during which Trump said, “Judge Gorsuch has outstanding legal skills, a brilliant mind, tremendous discipline and has earned bipartisan support.” “Standing here in a house of history, and acutely aware of my own imperfections, I pledge that if I am confirmed I will do all my powers permit to be a faithful servant of the Constitution and laws of this great country,” Gorsuch said on Tuesday. The 49-year-old Gorsuch, a conservative judge who currently sits on the federal appeals court in Denver, is the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Supreme Court justice argue in valid points. The world is changing and so does technology and the views of citizens. While making decision justice(s) must think about when was constitution written and how the world have change since then, if not it would be like watching black and white television today. So I support the Justice Breyer approach and court must be guided by the views of the citizens. Just a caution note I’m not trying to say we must ignore the constitution and do what we like…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Attitudinal Model

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Segal, Spaeth & Harold (p. 53) “At the core of a constitutive approach to Supreme Court decision making are the following six major premises: First, the Court does not follow elections or politics, but views itself as autonomous from direct and indirect political pressure. Second, justices do not follow personal policy wants. Third, respect for precedent and principled decision making are central to Supreme Court decision-making.” This is important to understand when trying to understand the attitudinal and strategic model. The conventional explanation for these theories is that 1) Attitudinal model are political ideologies regarding the judges identify as either conservative and liberal.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Constitution provides that all federal judges shall be nominated by the president with “Advice and Consent” of the Senate (Article II, Section 2).” (text, p. 387) With only the President deciding who the Justices will be, this is not democratic. The citizens of the United States have direct influence on who the delegates for the Electoral College will be, who then, choose the President. The President then chooses who he wants to be Justices. The votes of the people are only an echo bouncing off the walls of the White House.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe a litmus test should be used. Federal judges are in for 10 years unless reappointed for. During the time the Federal judges are in office things will change over the many years they are in. We shouldn’t hold onto beliefs or laws that are outdated. The decisions of these judges impact not only the parties involved in a particular case, but also the entire judicial system and even society at large.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ensuing, the devastating death of Antonin Scalia, the obvious question rose as to who President Obama will nominate as a successor to Scalia. Since the court is now leveled between liberals and conservatives, court rulings would often tie if a replacement is not found soon. In court rulings the lower court rulings will stand. Ultimately, this could affect cases such as voting rights, affirmative action, labor unions, abortion, contraception and immigration. Senate Republicans have already made the decision to refuse to confirm before the election, considering they want to leave the decision to the next president.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president may not unilaterally appoint justices; he may only nominate them, and abide by the Senate’s verdict on them, whether confirmation or rejection. As the constitutional scholar John McGinnis writes, “the very…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays