Supreme Court Ideology

Improved Essays
Amongst all the legal processes and systems that we discussed in class, the practice of checks and balances is the treasure of our American government system. Within this federalist process, the Supreme Court is an attractive venue to explore the linkage between social issues and personal ideologies, and how combined, these two concepts seep into laws, and, or politics. If one considers the current ideological makeup of the Supreme Court, which consists of five Republicans and four Democrats, the initial response to the proposed question would be: No, the Court will not endorse a broad mandate for the federal government to address social problems. This answer could be justifiable based on the notion that Republicans and Democrats, regardless of their governmental limitations, adopt …show more content…
Currently, Republicans’ religious beliefs drive the GOP because they are the majority. Therefore, policies are values put into action. A clear example is the recent rebirth of an old-age debate, pro-choice or pro-life. In addition to the importance of personal political ideology, the make-up of the Supreme Court is vital to the advancement of individual rights. The Supreme Court has and can shift the moral weight of the Constitution. Despite lifetime tenure, the U. S’s evolving culture, norms, and values can influence the decisions of the justices. If a large percentage of the public communicates liberal-based values, the Court tends to issue liberal-based decisions, such as marriage equality and the Title VI. Whenever the majority of Americans advocate for the extension of rights to groups or privatization, over time, justices’ decision reflects those collective morals. Also, the public's opinion influence justices’ nominations and confirmations. The public influence is inevitable, and honestly, is not the problematic factor in the advancement of human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scorpions: An Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of his career, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a total of seven justices to the United States Supreme Court. Professor of Law at Harvard, and author, Noah Feldman, focuses on the background and evolution of four of FDR’s most influential justice appointees—Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and Robert Jackson— throughout his book Scorpions. In the Supreme Court of FDR, and in our modern-day court, one often wonders how justices’ rulings are influenced. Throughout Scorpions, one may see FDR’s justices’ voting behavior demonstrates that a justice’s background, and their friendships, or vendettas against other members on the court, may impact voting behavior. In addition, there may be different degrees…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Jackson Influences

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After the death of Roosevelt, the relationships and ideas of FDR’s justices diverged. In part, due to a series of unfortunate events, such as the Republicans taking back the Senate and House, the weak Harry Truman in office, and numerous personal frustrations, contempt bred rapidly among the justices (306). Where once bonds held these men together, the justices became bitter enemies. While none of the justices were actual “friends,” camps, or alliances, seemed to form on the bench. On one side were Justices Frankfurter and Jackson, the other Justices Black and Douglas.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a collaborative research study called “Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices,” the researchers (which I will refer to as Epstein et al.) looked into 16 different Supreme Court justices that served for 10 or more terms and started and ended their service in between 1937-1993. Based on two different models they charted out the Justice’s voting habits liberally or conservatively to see how they voted and if their votes changed over time or if there was a pattern associated with their term on the bench. The attitudinal model assumes that “justices are goal-directed actors who want case outcomes to reflect as closely as possible their particular policy preferences. (And that) they achieve their goal…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Right Court but the Wrong Appeal Pay No Attention to the Men Behind the Curtain: The Supreme Court, Popular Culture, and the Countermajoritarian Problem is an article written by Adam Burton. His article depicts how the American people view the Supreme Court through pop culture, and how this relationship affects the public’s confidence in Judiciary Review. The article also demonstrates how the increased exposure of the Justices personal lives through highly televised confirmation hearings has not sparked the public’s interest into the inner workings of the court.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In theory, the Supreme Court is meant to be the unbiased force in the United States. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the Supreme Court Justices have a noticeable bias towards their political parties. Unlike Congress, where the political bias from the representatives is expected, the Supreme Court is not meant to have a political leaning. The Constitution states the purpose of the Supreme Court is meant to interpret the Constitution in the most apolitical way possible. However, this is a very recent issue that has developed.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three controversial issues that were handled by the courts are abortion, affirmative action, and capital punishment. One of the major themes of Justice Brennan's judicial philosophy is, ‘“...due process”’ is a concept whose meaning is not static, frozen by the framers in 1787, but one that changes over time, as society changes”(Irons 330). Another major theme is ‘“ The view that all matters of substantive policy should be resolved through the majoritarian process has appeal under some circumstances, but I think ultimately it will not do”(Irons 330). He argues that what it can't do is protect rights of minorities and it wont give them a fair voice in government decisions.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pewresearch.com took a survey on Republicans, Democrats, and Independents on whether the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they are meant today or as they were originally written. Most Republicans said that the U.S. Supreme Court should base rulings as they were originally written (69% to 29%). On the other hand, Democrats (70% to 26%) and Independents (48% to 47%) said that the court rulings today should be based on what the U.S. Constitution means in current times. In total 49% of the people that were surveyed, said that the Supreme Court should base rulings on today’s meaning of it. 46% of people surveyed said that they should rule court cases by how the U.S. Constitution was originally written.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays