Supreme Court Case: The Kennedy V. Louisiana Case

Improved Essays
Kennedy vs Louisiana (2007) was a case about a guy name Patrick Kennedy and is charged with aggravated rape of his eight year old stepdaughter. The eight year old child suffered serious injuries from Mr. Kennedy. Under the Louisiana Law, the prosecutor is allowed to seek the death penalty against defendants who are found guilty of raping children under the age of twelve. The jury granted the prosecutor the death penalty in which he sought. The difference between the Coker vs Georgia case and the Kennedy vs. Louisiana case is that a child is involved. Patrick Kennedy wanted the writ of certiorari for the United States Supreme Court to review the decision upheld by the Louisiana Supreme Court. Kennedy is arguing that Louisiana’s capital rape …show more content…
This leads to the question: Does the State of Louisiana violate the Eight Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment by imposing the death sentence for the crime of child rape?
Jeffery L. Fisher is the defense attorney that is appealing on behalf of Patrick Kennedy. On the opening statement of Jeffery Fisher, he brought up a fact to the court that the United States has not executed any offender for rape in over forty years. Mr. Fisher had two arguments he wanted to address to the court. The first point was telling the court that majority of the states are against the death penalty upon rapist, although, six states still have a rape statute to allow states to punish offenders with the death penalty to those who have committed the crime of rape. Louisiana is the only state to use capital punishment on Mr. Kennedy, who indeed is not a recidivist, and place him on death row. The second argument Mr. Fisher is trying to point out is how the juries have the complete free of discretion to choose any number of offenders who have committed a crime of rape. Coker vs. Georgia plays an important role to the Kennedy vs. Louisiana case because Mr. Fisher stated that the court here did not use capital

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Under the Eighth Amendment,…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January of 1983 Nancy Beth Cruzan lost control of her car on a icy Missouri road. This accident left Nancy brain damaged and was left in a “permanent vegetative state”. She could breath on her own but other than that there was nothing she could do on her own and she showed no signs of thinking capabilities. The doctors put a feeding tube into her stomach about month after the accident.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us government Ms.Crouse Victoria Liu 5/8/2017 Supreme Court case The case Nixon, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. V. Shrink Missouri Government PAC et al. was argued on the 5th of October, 1999. The respondents, Shrink Missouri PAC as a political action committee and Zev David Fredman who was a candidate for Missouri state auditor eyeing the 1998 Republican Party nominations alleged in a suit they filed that a statute in Missouri limiting contributions in the range of $275 to $1075 to candidates running for state office was in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendments constitutional rights ("Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    United States vs. Robert F McDonnell and use pills Maureen McDonnell case number 15 – 474 the Supreme Court McDowell petitioned the official Act of the conspiracy charges and conviction did not provide Pacific evidence. In 2014 Robert McDonnell, because the 71 Governor of Virginia throughout the term in office became partners with Jonnie Williams, a wealthy businessman. Williams offered favors to influence McDonnell supports with the dietary corporation at the Star Scientific Inc. Robert McDonnell and his wife, Maureen, were in financial distress. Their debt was overwhelming, and they needed a way out of their debt. Therefore, Williams agreed to reduce their deficit with loans, paid expenses and luxurious contributions.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that the execution of minors is cruel and punishment prohibited by the 8th…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine that last week your best friend was murdered. Now, you’re in court and the offender was ruled to have only 11 years of prison, instead of the death penalty in the eyes of the pubic. Would you agree that the punishment given was proportional and justified the crime offended? It certainly wouldn’t have back then, so why is it now? The 8th amendment have changed based on how our prosectives changed over time and so has our ways of interpreting the terms “ cruel and unusual”.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Kennedy is open to interpret the Constitution. Kennedy's base of political involvement begun with his father. As a Republican, his father influenced his conservative ideology to be dominant. However, Kennedy is also shaped by an evolving enlighten society. He is thoughtful towards the public than exercising his own personal ideas and fitting in into a particular ideology.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, so therefore one may not violate this particular law. However, what would happen if one did? Would it be justice? Well, “on June 25, 2012 the supreme court ruled juveniles who committed murder could not be sentence to life in prison because it violated the Eighth Amendment…” To this, though what would man be if we did not treat every person, young or old, equally.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eighth Amendment, which forbids unnecessary fines and bails as well as cruel and unusual punishment, was included in the Constitution because the British’s ways of punishment angered the Founding Fathers of the constitution and they wanted to be sure that the government’s power would not be abused and to prevent any future problems arising in areas of justice. The framers of the constitution, when writing the Eighth Amendment, took into consideration cases where severe punishments such as, branding, strangling or burning would be used. According to Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, “One clue to the expectations of the framers comes from the debates of the First Congress that proposed the Eighth Amendment. On the floor of the House, Representative Livermore complained about the vagueness of the amendment's language: "It is sometimes necessary to hang a man, villains often deserve a whipping, and perhaps having their ears cut off, but are we in the future to be prevented from inflicting those punishments because they are 'cruel'?” .…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1910, Weems v. United States allowed the Court to more loosely interpret the Eighth Amendment. The concurring emphasized that the interpretation of the Constitution, particularly the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause, would change over time and that the Court would similarly have to adapt its views. 47 years later, the Court would formalize this idea in Trop v. Dulles. They asserted that the Eighth Amendment should be interpreted with society’s “evolving standards of decency”. The “evolving standards of decency” component of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause would later be cited in landmark juvenile death penalty…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Attorneys who deal with Civil Rights and Constitutional issues attend to predicaments concerning the Eighth Amendment every day. Still though, it leads you to think “what exactly is a “cruel and unusual punishment” within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment?” (What…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While statutory rape laws are in place to protect minors of both sexes who have been sexually victimized by adults, there is a tendency for those enforcing the law to take the side of the female, and the older the accused is, the harsher the penalty is likely to be. Age, gender, or even sexual orientation can sometimes be contributory factors in harsher punishments handed down by those enforcing the law. Due to this bias, laws that are meant to protect minors from adults, often make allowance for other adolescents to be indicted as well. This information brings about the question of whether or not the laws regarding statutory rape are discriminatory in their wording, and what can be done to change this?…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Helms (1983), which strived to apply a test to determine whether or not a punishment was proportional to its crime, especially in regards to death penalty jurisprudence, and by addressing the purpose behind the death penalty in Gregg v. Georgia (428 U.S. 153 1976), to determine whether or not it was inherently cruel and unusual. Explicitly in Gregg v. Georgia, Justice Stewart remarks in his majority opinion that the death penalty “serve[s] two principal social purposes: retribution and deterrence (Gregg v. Georgia 1976).” Despite this, however, the debate on the death penalty and deterrence has been carried out for decades. The…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, life in prison, being put to death or losing one’s testicles are proper procedures of punishment for those convicted of rape. As shown in the 40-year-old case; the rapist was rightfully charged and sentenced to a life in prison, making him unable to lay a hand on his victim again. Following, the Kennedy vs. Louisiana case rapist Patrick Kennedy, is now sentenced to death, which makes it impossible for him to rape anyone. Thirdly, James Allan of Florida has been castrated for his actions, reducing his sexual desire and eliminating his sex life forever. Others may come to believe the punishment of sending one to prison for life, letting one burn in hell or castration is too harsh of a punishment for rape.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays