Summary: To Kill A Mockingbird

Decent Essays
To: VRoland
From: Clarissa Trejo
Assignment: Key Cases (Gagnon v Scarpelli Pg. 393) & (Mempa v Rhay Pg. 393) Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) The safeguards identified in Morrissey v. Brewer were extended to probationers. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Scarpelli, the respondent, had a felony probationer, then was detained for carrying out a burglary crime. Scarpelli's, probation was cancelled without an official hearing and was not represented by counsel. The respondent, filed a petition for habeas corpus and the District Court concluded that revocation of probations with no hearing and no counsel was denied of due process.
Mempa v. Rhay (1967) Both notice and a hearing are required before probation revocation, and the probationer should have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Mempa v. Rhay, Jerry Douglas Mempa had pleaded guilty to joyriding, which then resulted in Mempa being on probation for a number of two years. Mempa’s case was then deferred but approximately four months later, he was then charged with burglary. Mempa’s probation was revoked, due to the burglary charge, and during the revocation process, Mempa had no counsel to represent him, was not offered the option of having counsel to represent him, nor asked of his previous court-appointed counsel. He plead guilty to the burglary charges and was sentenced to 10 years maximum, in compliance to Washington State Law ("Mempa v. Rhay 389 U.S. 128 (1967)", 2017). Within six years, Mempa sought a writ of Habeas Corpus because he was denied counsel during…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the adjudicatory process, there are usually two judicial hearings that the juvenile attends. The first is the initial appearance, is the equivalent of arraignment where the juvenile is notified of the charges against them, they are appointed legal counsel and bail is considered. If the case has not been settled by the close of the initial appearance, it is held for trial. In re Gault is the case that changed the nature of juvenile trials forever. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court ruled that defendants must be afforded the same rights as adults.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Scarpelli Case Summary

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, the sentence was later on suspended, and he was placed on probation for seven years. The defendant and another man on 6th August 1975 were apprehended while committing a house burglary (Latessa & Smith, 2015). As such, the probation was revoked without a court hearing and a court counsel/attorney representation. As a result, Scarpelli filed a Habeas Corpus petition. Issue…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction In this paper, I will discuss the key facts, issues, and court holdings of the Fare v. Michael C. case. Discussion The Fare v. Michael C. case was heard before the United States Supreme Court in 1979, following an appeal referencing the Miranda Warnings issued to the juvenile defendant (Elrod & Ryder, 2014). At the time of the arrest in February 1976 in Van Nuys, California, the suspect, Michael C., was just over sixteen years old (FindLaw, n.d.)…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When his probation was revoked the court failed to appoint him legal representation and they failed to give him hearings following the revocation which violated his due process rights(Findlaw’s). In addition, the probation officer was negligent in not recognizing that Scarpelli didn't have the proper representation and recognizing that his clients due process rights were being violated (Findlaw’s) It’s my opinion that Scarpelli should not have been released so soon after being convicted to fifteen years after his first armed robbery crime and he should have served a portion of that sentence. I also feel that the judge was negligent by releasing him and allowing him to leave Wisconsin to live in Illinois. If Scarpelli’s due process rights had not been violated he probably wouldn’t have been paroled and he would have served the remainder of his original…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the Respondent Gerald Scarpelli was a convicted criminal who originally pleaded guilty to armed robbery in Wisconsin. The presiding judge, in this case, sentenced him to 15 years incarceration for the robbery offense but suspended the imprisonment and placed him on probation, which is a community transition program, for 7 years (Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 US 778 - Supreme Court 1973). I think the judge had the expectation of Scarpelli fulfilling the terms of his probation and the other stipulations that were required during his time since it was certainly less than the originally stated 15 years. Scarpelli was given permission to live in Illinois under the Adult Probation Department of Cook County but was later…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Scout and Jem are asked/encouraged to think about Boo Radley as a man, not a monster. Calpurnia makes certain that Scout does not treat Walter Cunningham like he is lesser than the Finches. Atticus advises the children that they are needed/demanded to trear black people and even people like Mrs. Dubose with…

    • 53 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The respondent, Gerald Scarpelli, a felony probationer was arrested after committing a burglary. The respondent's probation was revoked without a hearing and he was not represented by counsel. He filed a petition for habeas corpus and the District Court concluded that revocation of probation without a hearing and without counsel was a denial of due process. The Court of Appeals affirmed.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Gagnon, I preliminary hearing regarding the violation of probation, it will be decided that if the probationer should remain in custody while waiting for me to either see the probationer or for me to go ahead and have the full along with the final hearing in regards to the revocation of his probation.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973), the United States Supreme Court held that due process mandates a preliminary and final revocation hearing for a probationer under the same conditions specified in Morrissey v. Brewer, (1972). These hearings are now known as the Gagnon I and Gagnon II hearings (Worrall, 2015). A Gagnon I hearing occurs the probationer is arrested for an alleged violation (Worrall, 2015). The hearing is to determine if the probationer should remain in custody or be released back into the community (Worrall, 2015). A Gagnon II hearing is the final revocation hearing when a determination is made on the status of probation, and if the probationer is found in violation then the Judge will determine the sentence (Worrall, 2015).…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #2: Summarize at least three landmark cases made by the US Supreme Court and discuss their impact on the Juvenile Justice system. The practices of early America resulted in harsher punishments for juveniles than adults who may have committed the same crime. By the nineteenth century, these practices began to change through campaigns advocating rights for children, as they were becoming aware that children might not be as responsible for their crimes as adults, like previously believed. This eventually led to the nation’s first juvenile court that was established in Cook County, Chicago in 1899. Since then, there have been many court decisions that have assisted with the way the juvenile justice system practices today.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Close that curtain, Jessie, I have no wish to regard my garden and examine the destruction caused by that, horrible little boy.” “That’s more appropriate, now where’s my tea, go and fetch it at once!” “Maids, what’s becoming of them, acting as though they are equals to us white folk, it’s simply not allowed!” Crossing my arms I lean back and ponder the situation “It doesn’t help this situation when no one listens to my opinion, sure they believe there’s a difference between themselves and their maids, however they have no idea how alike they appear.” “Finally back Jessie?…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why is it a sin to kill a mockingbird? In Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird, a mockingbird symbolizes innocence. According to Atticus, “It is a sin to kill a mockingbird” (Pg 119). Three examples of mockingbirds are, Mayella Ewell, Tom Robinson, and Boo Radley.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should There Any Judgement Limitation of Testimonial in Social Media ? Social medias are computer-mediated tools that allow people or companies to create, share, or exchange information, career interests, ideas, and pictures/videos in virtual communities and networks. Social media is a wonderful channel for brands to engage with their target tribe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays