Obergefell V. Hodges Supreme Court Case Analysis

Improved Essays
The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States clearly states that the laws of the country protect all citizens equally. This amendment extends the right to marriage to same-sex couples. The fight for gay rights did not begin in the twenty-first century, but can …show more content…
Meaning that power is divided between the national and state governments. Each have specific powers which the other cannot change or override. States not in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage claimed that the national government did not have the authority to overrule their laws. Nullification is “the historical idea that states can ignore federal laws, or pass laws that supersede them” (Graham) these states tried to nullify the Supreme Courts decision. Public officials in many states such as Ted Cruz support the idea that the Supreme Court’s ruling is not in fact the law of the land. While being interviewed by National Public Radio, Cruz commented on the Supreme Court decision, “They cannot ignore a direct judicial order. The parties to a case cannot ignore a direct judicial order. But it does not mean that those who are not parties to case are bound by a judicial order …” (Graham). Contrary to the statement made by Ted Cruz, the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution says that the constitution has authority over state laws, it has “ultimate authority in the U.S.” (Graham). If it is written in the Constitution, then the states cannot make laws against it or blatantly ignore the decision …show more content…
No one citizen is lesser than in the eyes of the law. Written on July 9, 1868, the amendment was originally meant to protect the rights of black citizens. After the civil war Jim Crow laws caused the segregation of blacks in public places, such as movie theaters and bathrooms. The amendment was made to push southern and boarder states in a segregation free direction. Although, it was mostly written for this purpose, the amendment gave all citizens equal protection under the law, this includes same-sex couples. Race or sexual orientation cannot affect a persons rights and protections under the law, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (Cornell). Treating an individual or a group of people unfairly would be a direct violation of the United States

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cornell University. ] The case was first granted by the Supreme Court on January 16, 2015; Argued starting April 28,anything else. 2015; and decided June 26, 2015. The decision fell in favour for Obergefell with a 5 to 4 decision by the Supreme Court. In the article cited, it is stated that, “Because there are no differences between a same-sex union and an opposite-sex union with respect to these principles [building a home and raising children] the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” [ Obergefell…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13th Amendment Advantages

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 14th amendment basically defined what it meant to be an American citizen and also create protection for all citizens. There are three clauses included in the amendment and they are all still very relevant today. Before this amendment, African Americans…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, the national government grew weak and states operated like independent countries. In response to this the delegates at the 1787 convention which was originally set to ratify the Articles of Confederation devised a plan for a stronger federal government with three branches–executive, legislative and judicial–along with a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch would ever gain too much power. The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, while guaranteeing that certain basic rights for its citizens would be established and protected. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution ensures that all United States citizens get equal protection of laws by the government. This was made to ensure that many African Americans have their basic rights protected. The 14th Amendment even caused the Supreme Court to become involved in the process of protecting these rights for the children of immigrants and Native Americans. It also ensured the safety and protection of rights for all Americans regardless of race. There are numerous cases where the 14th Amendment was used to make the cases about the facts rather than the race.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holder court case the justices ruled that Section four is unconstitutional and that the methods used can no longer be used to give preclearance. The majority decision, given by Chief Justice John G. Roberts points to the past skepticism about needing to update the Voting Rights Act.4 First he states the act developed have an expiration date, and that time is well passed according to the majority decision. He also discusses the tenth amendment, giving powers to the states that are not specifically given to the federal government, was part of the main argument for the majority opinion because the justices thought that this removes authority from the states, who constitutionally should be treated equally.4 Second the chief justice points multiple times to the fact that times have changed since the historic 1965 case fifty years ago.4 He describes that in 1965 this part of the Voting Rights Act made sense and had a real purpose, but section four was developed with an expiration date for the quickly changing United States. Since the United States was changing it was necessary for Congress to completely change the Voting Rights Act, but failed to change section four. Lastly the decisions leaves Congress the obligation to change section five, based on the newly developed United States and modern times which may now consist of a growing Latino population.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Explain the Civil Rights Acts. United States courts and legislatures have a reciprocal reliance with each other. In order for a legislature to act, it requires constitutional authority. While courts require legislative/administrative support to utilize court orders and target political support.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1) The 14th Amendment was significant to American Civil rights because of due process of law. Due process guarantees every person born or naturalized in the United States the same rights, regardless of race. It also notes that the every state must not abridge the “privileges and immunities" of citizens. Another section of the amendment states that no person can be denied “equal protection of the laws”.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified after the Civil War on July 9, 1868. The Amendment established the protection of freedmen’s rights by guaranteeing their equal rights and stopping states from denying their citizenship, this Amendment has become the cornerstone of civil rights and a landmark of the Supreme Court decisions. Due to the amendment the Bill of Rights protects us from state actions, which the federal government only had the power to enforce, this was because of the Incorporation Doctrine that the Fourteenth Amendment went through and without it, it would cause many problems like; Miranda Rights being said by officers, the First Amendment could not stop states from restricting free speech, and there would be no Sixth Amendment…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Virginia case. Obergefell V. Hodges was another case involving the law restricting marriage. Instead of race, however, it was sexual orientation. The Supreme Court decision ruled in favor of gay marriage and made it legal in all fifty states, but there was not the same unanimous decision of the justices as in Loving V. Virginia.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 14th Amendment was ratified on the 9th of July, in the year of 1868. This new Amendment was created to protect African Americans against discriminatory laws. Southern states that had previously succeeded from America could rejoin the Union, upon the ratification of the 14th Amendment. This new Amendment gave citizenship to all persons who were either born or naturalized in the United States, including former slaves. The 14th Amendment also forbade the states from setting laws that denied any person "life, liberty or property, without due process of law."…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fourteenth amendment is known as a civil rights amendment, and was passed by Congress on June 13, 1866, then ratified on July 28, 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment states as follows: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This granted citizenship to slaves and other minorities born of this land, citizenship and the right to be called an American. Being a citizen, you have the authority to question rules and legislation. You have the right to bring a concern to court because our government allows it.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government’s process may be handled as in the Constitution, but the rights stated in it are not followed; so do we really live under ”Constitutional Government”? Having a democracy means that not everyone is going to get what they want, but do the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Same-sex marriage is not only disruptive to the societal order, it also disrupts the Constitution. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was an amendment to the Constitution…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays