Summary: The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons

Improved Essays
If it is the case that nuclear weapons are defensive in nature and have little use for offensive purposes, the United States concern about nuclear proliferation stems from a fear of irrational actors and a weakening of US world dominance. I use “defensive in nature” in the context of nuclear weapons to mean it is intended, by rational states, to deter attacks from other states and is not intended to be used as a first strike. By “irrational actors” I mean states that act in a way that violates their perceived best interests. In chapter two of “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed”, Scott D. Sagan explains the flaws in the idea that states possessing nuclear weapons will be rational actors. There is an assumption that all states

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The completion of the atomic bomb is not enough to justify the use of it. However, it is the circumstance and context of America’s foreign policy that justify the USA’s use of nuclear warfare. The attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was a significant threat to the United States, causing over 2,300 US casualties. It is undeniable that the surprise attack was an instant threat to their considered global dominance, domestic stability and entrenched ideology and nationalism. Pearl Harbor exacerbated the threat of the Axis; leading the USA to adopt an even stricter defensive realist foreign policy.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article takes a “laid back” tone by using terms such as “nukes” and “pragmatic administration.” Tepperman takes the side of nuclear deterrence; by having nukes nation states are too scared to use them. He presents, “nuclear weapons have not been used since 1945” and a professor's quote “‘We now have 64 years of experience since Hiroshima ….. There has not been any war among nuclear states.’” Tepperman believes that everyone has enough morals to not use nuclear arms due to the mass destruction that would follow.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When World War II struck the nation, the United States became known as a super power but not right from the start. America started out being neutral and helping out with the war from only they were selective in who they helped, so America was not being very neutral. America denied aid to Japan and Germany, the United States had even put out an order to shoot German U-Boats on sight. World War II broke out in 1939 and ended by 1945 the United States entered by declaring war on Japan in 1941 after the fatal Pearl Harbor attack on December 7, three days after the United States declared war on the Japanese, Germany and Italy declared war on America putting the United States in a full fledged two front war. A main reason the war ended when it did…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plethora of ways that nuclear weapons can be deployed only help make the other countries that don't have nuclear weapons respect the ones that do even more. The ways that the weapons can be deployed are explained by a nuclear triad, which is the delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal by…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that those who possess power can do as they choose is not new. This idea was proven true during the Cold War in the late 1950s and 1960s. In Pat Frank’s Alas, Babylon, the Soviet Union was in deadlock with the United States for world domination. One false step by the American Air Force had disastrous repercussions for the citizens of the United States.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the United States first developed the nuclear bomb it had secured its place as the most powerful nation in the world. There was no need for deterrence back then because nobody else had acquired nuclear bombs yet. Essentially the United States could get away with nuking anyone without any major consequences and without sending any ground troops. Only a few planes were needed to do the trick. It was only a matter of time before another state pursued the same technology and within a few years, the USSR had succeeded.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the war, every soldier must put themselves in their enemy’s shoes. One must truly understand their enemy's motives, fear, ticks etc. in order to empathize with them. From this, one can understand their enemy’s situation from their point of view. Then, the soldiers can predict how their enemies will react to different military attacks.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dear Mr. Ban, I am formally writing this letter to ask for your intercession in the grave matter that has been threatening our world since Enrico Fermi successfully created the first nuclear reactor, which later on made way for the atomic and hydrogen bombs. Currently, nine countries are in possession of nuclear weapons. This is enough nuclear capability to wipe out the human race completely. This is what is worrisome. During the Cold War, we saw a considerable increase of nuclear armament in the United States and Russia.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am living in perhaps one of the most fortunate generations thus far when it comes to information. With extensive documents, letters, recordings, and statistics from different eras in history accessible to the general public, we have the opportunity to inform ourselves of the consequences of past actions which we can use this insight by avoiding future failures and calamities in future decision making. Such events discussed in class includes the usage of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to conclude largest war known to mankind. Analyzing various resources from this event raises many issues regarding to the bombings and whether or not a different tactic should have been considered. I have the benefit of examining the effects of the…

    • 1354 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zero Sum Logic Essay

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The proper Global Security role of the United States in the international order over the next 20 years will need to be a “lead by example mentality.” There needs to be a better U.S. and China (G2) relationship in order to tackle the major ecumenical quandaries the world faces such as climate change, economic imbalances, nuclear proliferation, and interventions in failed states, terrorism, energy, and food security. The U.S. needs to take the initiative and dissever itself from the notion of “the Zero-sum logic.” The Zero-sum logic is when a country’s gain looks homogeneous to another’s loss. According to Rachman, “Zero-sum logic has averted the world from reaching a consequential acquiescent to combat ecumenical warning.”…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Analyze proliferation risk in the Middle East” “ Proliferation begets proliferation” (George Shultz) The escalation of Iranian and North Korea nuclear crisis causes apprehension that deteriorating security condition in the Middle East will encourages additional countries to seek nuclear weapons. Iran nuclear program will open the nuclear armament race in the Middle East. Iran is seeking for nuclear bomb for many reasons such as security and political, domestic at the same time that will encourage many states in the regions to acquire nuclear bomb Saudi Arabia, Egypt. We can reduce the proliferation risk the through implementations NPT obligation, and strengthen IAEA roles.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays