It was argued over whether they would follow the flag and American laws or not. Finally, the Supreme Court made a decision. Although badly divided, the verdict was that the American constitutional law, including the bill of rights, did not apply to those in Puerto Rico and the Philippines. So, as the textbook explains, “Puerto Ricans (and Filipinos) might be subject to American rule, but they did not enjoy all American rights” (Kennedy, Cohen, Bailey 640). The impact of this ruling was the distinction between incorporated territories and unincorporated territories. Incorporated territories, such as Hawaii and Alaska, would follow the constitution and flag. However, what this case established was that unincorporated territories, such as Puerto Rico and the Philippines, do not get such rights. Because U.S. sovereignty has not been established, the countries do not follow the law of the
It was argued over whether they would follow the flag and American laws or not. Finally, the Supreme Court made a decision. Although badly divided, the verdict was that the American constitutional law, including the bill of rights, did not apply to those in Puerto Rico and the Philippines. So, as the textbook explains, “Puerto Ricans (and Filipinos) might be subject to American rule, but they did not enjoy all American rights” (Kennedy, Cohen, Bailey 640). The impact of this ruling was the distinction between incorporated territories and unincorporated territories. Incorporated territories, such as Hawaii and Alaska, would follow the constitution and flag. However, what this case established was that unincorporated territories, such as Puerto Rico and the Philippines, do not get such rights. Because U.S. sovereignty has not been established, the countries do not follow the law of the