Summary: The Importance Of Juvenile To Life In Prisons

Decent Essays
Marjie Lundstrom wrote an article where Nathaniel Brazil, a middle school boy who shot his English teacher to death because he was not allowed to say goodbye to some girls, was sentenced to life in prison when the juvenile himself did not know the severity of his crime. Brazil was fourteen when he was sentenced to life yet his immaturity and failure to recognize risk and punishments was not taken into consideration. In 2012, the Supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is considered cruel punishment, which is against the Eighth Amendment. Juveniles should be punished for their crimes but should not be sentenced to die in prison with no education or rehabilitation because they …show more content…
In Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences, by Gail Garinger, she states, “children [are] told that they [can] never change and that no one [cares] what [becomes] of them.” Being told that you are nothing and that you can’t do anything to become something other than an inmate in a jail cell is the epitome of lost hope. Garinger, also a former juvenile judge, has seen first hand the capacity that children have to change for the better. Since these juveniles are still very naive and adaptable they are great candidates for rehabilitation so they can be taught how to be productive and law-abiding citizens in society.
Some of these juveniles, along with psychological problems, also have the fact that they are losing gray matter in their brain, the part that supports thinking and emotion. IN Startling Finds on Teenage Brains, by Paul Thompson, he adds, “brain cells and connections are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk taking, and self control.” This means that young people are trying to fight against their own body and still deal with their school, social and personal lives. Young people are being sentenced as adults when their underdeveloped brains and their actions are anything but adult

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    An estimated 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated every year across the United States (campaign for youth justice). There is large controversy regarding whether or not children and young adults should be required to be sentenced as adults, regardless of their age and circumstance. This is believed to be the most logical way of approaching this matter because every case should undergo the same consequences despite the criminal’s circumstances. An opposing view would argue that it is necessary to take into consideration the situation of each criminal case before deciding on the punishment. They would also claim that children specifically, should be given another chance due to their lack of maturity.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The brains of adolescents are still maturing and lack decision-making abilities, thought processing and the ability to understand the consequences of their actions.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sentencing wasn’t the only thing that ultimately affected these juveniles lives. Being young and locked away as a prisoner, is frightening, no support, and sometimes years of nothingness essentially leads many of these individuals to miss out on life, and…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A young offender who serves their time and is then released back into society is far less likely to offend again when compared to a juvenile who has spend their entire young adult life in an adult facility (Reaves, 2001). If a juvenile is rehabilitated and becomes a contributing member of society, money is saved but more importantly a life is…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    to minimize the offenders culpability simply because of their age (Jenkins)”. But supporters don't take in account of mitigating factors that were possibly overlooked. These extenuating circumstances include immaturity, impetuosity, failure to recognize risks and consequences, and family/home environment (Liptak and Bronner). These factors call into question if life without parole is necessary for juveniles to serve adult time for adult crime. Do adult still believe that juveniles won’t change or be rehabilitated.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Juvenile Transfer Laws Alonza Thomas was a 15 year old teenager with no prior convictions or a record. He decided to run away from home and found himself staying with someone he thought he could trust. Unfortunately, the man he was staying with demanded that Thomas was to rob a gas station to pay him back in return for staying in his house and eating his food. The man supplied Thomas with a loaded gun to rob a gas station.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One reason why juveniles should not receive life in prison without parole is the undeveloped thinking process that occurs. This is further explored in the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” by Paul Thompson, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles. In the article, Thompson focuses on the cognitive development of the juvenile brain and compares it with the brain of a full grown adult. He uses an example of a juvenile being tried as an adult for second-degree murder to point out how when questioned, the juvenile was unable to give a reason for his actions. He then reports on findings about the teenage brain that he and his research team had discovered.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Juveniles Should Be Tried As Adults” by Mary Estudillo, brings up many strong arguments as to why juveniles should be tried as adults, but the opposing article, “Juveniles Should Not Be Tried As Adults” written by Hannah McCrea strongly claims they should not. Estudillo cites examples of cases in which juveniles committed first and second degree murder, and were thereafter tried as adults. She explains how juveniles should be tried as adults because they are criminals, and criminals need to held responsible for their actions. She also brings up how rehabilitation does little to sometimes nothing for the child, so when they are released, they commit another crime. Alternatively, McCrea authored “Juveniles Should Not Be Tried As Adults,” and states how adult prisons do more harm than good for juveniles.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A juvenile’s call to action can go on without much thought, while an adult understands the consequences of committing a crime. She also mentions, “the same malleability that makes them vulnerable to peer pressure also makes them promising candidates for rehabilitation… majority of young offenders grow out of crime” (8-9). Juveniles can grow out of their misbehavior. It is easier to make a juveniles grow into a law-obeying citizen as juveniles are still developing, they can intake the information and understand from the mistake they made as a child. Given the chance and opportunity to be released at a reasonable age, juveniles can change for the better.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jennifer Bishop Jenkins speaks about how we here in the United States although we do give teenage murderers very big sentences that make them spend the rest of their life in prison we still respect their human rights. We do not imprison children nor torture and hurt the offenders, we simply are not letting their crimes go in vain. The authors purpose is to let us know that all though many people believe that teenagers who commit crimes should have a smaller sentence because of the way and the time it takes for their minds to develop. In fact she even states the following, "If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world. They do not.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing teenagers to receive the harshest sentence is not shared among all states. For, juveniles a mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole is unconstitutional. The United States stands on sentences that give juveniles life without parole. There are about two thousand juveniles without parole given the chance, to have their case heard in Supreme Court decisions. But, there are nineteen states that have banned possibility of parole for juveniles.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposition believes that juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to mandatory life in prison.the opposition claims that recent brain research made on teen brains has nothing to do with teens committing crime. Author of On Punishment and Teen Killers, Jennifer Jenkins claims that, “ Advocates often repeat, but truly misunderstand brain research on this issue. The actual science does not… in any way negate criminal culpability” (Jenkins). The idea behind this statement is that the recent research on teenage brains is invalid for proving a juvenile less innocent. This idea is highly disagreeable because juveniles are nothing like adults especially in decision making.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Research has shown that the rational part of the brain doesn’t even develop until around the age of twenty-five, according to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Adults process information with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part that responds to situations with awareness and good judgement. On the other hand, teenagers process information with the amygdala, otherwise known as the emotional part of the brain. This explain why when in a decision-making process that teenagers tend to act on feelings and emotions rather than considering the long-term consequences of their actions. Punishments considered fair for an adult are unreasonable when given to a child who does not even comprehend the consequences for his or her actions (“Should Juvenile Offenders Be Tried As…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics