Machiavelli's Discourses

Superior Essays
Topic II: Discourses

A great nation doesn 't just form in a day. It is a process in which great ingenuity and wisdom is needed. With this great wisdom, the founding fathers wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These renowned documents are used as a foundation for this nation to reign supreme for countless of years.The great philosopher and writer of Discourses Machiavelli influenced the writers of the documents with the belief that a great country must have a powerful army ready to invoke fear in the subjects of the nation and those outside of its boundaries, a great leader ready to do whatever is necessary for his country, and the need for strong nationalism. These teachings planted roots on this nation that in time flourished.

Machiavelli was the first realist of his kind. He was able to take the veil off most of the common issues and explain the reality of the nation. The founding fathers were inspired by Machiavelli because of his honest and simple discourses and ideals. Some of the beliefs might have been implemented without public notice, but time reveals how Machiavelli 's beliefs are used in the U.S. even today on defense.

The United States has one of the best militaries. The U.S spends over $711 billion per year, has over 80% of its attack helicopters, and ten aircraft carriers all ready to strike at any given moment. Winning war against the U.S.
…show more content…
Machiavellianism is a term for political realism and the lack of morality if it means getting the job done. For example, President Obama uses his legislative powers to pass necessary laws for this country. The authorization for the murder operation for Osama bin Laden didn 't make Obama didn 't hold back because he knew it was needed for the survival of the country , thus observing the rule of Machiavellianism even if it means making tough decisions which will not please

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The internal struggles and unsuccessful Articles of Confederation displayed the perilous situation America was in without a shared national identity. It was out of necessity for the Constitution to developed on their revolutionary principles (343). Furthermore, The Constitution was adopted as the national identity until one developed. The Constitution, the founding fathers, and their documents were deified by Americans. Americans studied, wrote, praised, and debated the constitution, but more importantly they endorsed the constitution’s…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From my assessment results, the outcome stated that I was in agreement with 10/13 questions. I was somewhat hesitant in reading the result, but was pleasantly surprise to see that it was completely different from what I thought the outcome was going to be, based on Machiavelli’s readings. After reading the results, I agreed where it states that no one thing is completely right or completely wrong, for an individual must be open to new thoughts; they should be able to see and take risk into that which is unfamiliar, or not favored, in-order to make possibilities a reality. Bedell, Huter, Angie & Vert (2006) stated that the Mach scale determines the extent to which respondents agree with Machiavelli's statements, on how a leader should act…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros and Cons of American Imperialism America is one of the most powerful nations of the world. Its sheer size, economy, territories, and technological advancements make it so influential that many smaller nations or cultures look up to America as if it were a god. Many decades ago, America established its dominance over other nations, particularly during the two world wars by showing off its military prowess and interfering with what are supposedly local affairs of other governments. Imperialism is more of a negative idea than a positive one – it signifies a nation's thirst for expansion at the expense of others.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not agree with Machiavelli's statement for a few reasons. The main reason I disagree is because Machiavelli's idea of peace seems to fall into the category of nonviolence and a lower crime rate. However, I do not think that this is the full peace that a nation should have. There may be "peace" just because people fear disobeying the tyrant or the power, but that does not ensure that there is actual peace and happiness in the everyday lives of the citizens. Tyranny cannot be justified if it keeps the peace, and in my opinion, it is a fake form of peace anyway.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In Niccolo 's most well-known book, The Prince, a strong emphasis is placed on the need for The Prince (or the governing body) to abandon principles and act immorally on occasion in order to achieve a particular objective (or to maintain/expand power).” Machiavelli’s impact on the U.S. especially has been more of a tougher stance. When someone thinks of Machiavelli they think of his key phrase, which is “the ends justify the means”. The meaning of this phrase is if a goal is morally important enough, you may pursue this method of achieving this goal no matter how immorally or unlawfully it may be. This phrase has had a tremendous impact on the United States especially after 9/11 and other terrorist/ domestic attacks on the U.S.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli looked into what is best for people and a government structure that can bring to a better society, happiness, and wealth for everyone. Both Plato and Machiavelli focused on a civil society that would work to secure the rule of law and protecting individual’s freedoms, as well as stability as a whole. They agreed that a government or a ruler would have to work for conditions that will bring prosperity of his citizens and a pleasing and satisfactory way of living. These two philosophers were too realistic in emphasizing a political structure of how government should perform to keep its citizens satisfied overall. Plato, for instance, was expecting an ideal government or a “just’’ society that would promote justice for…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Intro After reading The Leviathan by Hobbes and the Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses I would argue that the two authors have a similar view on how fear is politically relevant. What makes fear relevant to Machiavelli and Hobbes is that they believe that fear is necessary for a sovereign or a prince to stay in power. The two authors also believe that it is needed to keep the subjects in check and to keep them complacent. Today however there are people who question if fear is politically relevant today.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    look at John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli are two philosophers from the Renaissance period, who focused their work on creating a better society and government. Their work consists of theories of how rulers should rule their land and how they can get their subjects support. Locke’s Two Treaties of Government of Civil Government, is contrary to Machiavelli’s book The Prince. Whereas, Locke’s book is to justify the revolution of when King James II was removed from power, Machiavelli’s book is about how a ruler should exercise his power and gain control. Machiavelli’s theory is similar to dictatorship and Locke’s theory is the basis for classical liberalism.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I. Introduction: topic and each political theorist Throughout history many political thinkers have quoted the words of Niccolo Machiavelli. Founding father, John Adams and philosopher John Locke claimed to be students of Machiavelli (Viroli Intro). Machiavelli is considered a founder of political philosophy, but his work is not without opponents. Leo Strauss, a political philosopher, argued that Machiavelli was a “teacher of evil” in his book Thoughts on Machiavelli, written in 1958, in which he discusses his interpretation of Machiavelli’s work.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays